On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 07:38:44PM +1100, Bron Gondwana wrote:
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 02:16:21AM -0400, Carsey, Robert wrote:
On one which did not work, I found:
. SELECT INBOX
* 76 EXISTS
* 0 RECENT
* FLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Draft \Deleted \Seen)
* OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\Answered
Bron Gondwana wrote:
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 08:26:49PM -0400, Wesley Craig wrote:
On 17 Oct 2010, at 06:53, Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems) wrote:
I'm in favor to have (in our current X.Y.Z versioning schema) Z be
bumped with bug-fixes only. If we keep it to bug-fixes only, this
I am pleased to announce the release of Cyrus IMAPd 2.4.1. This is
primarily a bugfix release to the 2.4 branch that fixes several bugs
that were reported since the 2.4.0 release.
We recommend that anyone using 2.4.0 upgrade to 2.4.1. Notable changes
in the release are as follows:
- Fix
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 01:02:30PM -0400, Matt Selsky wrote:
Can we decide on a list of supported platforms and document it, ala
http://k5wiki.kerberos.org/wiki/Supported_platforms
Then we can at least compile-test on these platforms. And maybe
even upgrade-test these platforms before each
On Tue, 19 Oct 2010, Bron Gondwana wrote:
Sounds good to me. Of course we need to have someone who has access
to each of those platforms. Nice thing about a 'standard library' is
how unstandard it is! I would have though strcasestr was OK though.
Now I know.
Dave (McMurtie),
Could we get
Upgraded to 2.4.1. yey!
chk_cyrus aborts (it did with 2.4.0 also).
(gdb) bt
#0 0x003699a30265 in raise () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#1 0x003699a31d10 in abort () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#2 0x00406f88 in mailbox_unlock_index (mailbox=0x75b758, sdata=0x0) at
mailbox.c:1544
#3
