Re: Smoke [blead] v5.27.10-119-g5f6af817ad FAIL(XM) os/390 25.00 (2964/)

On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 11:31:13AM +, Yaroslav Kuzmin wrote: > So . I try running bisect.pl > > (16:23) RS12 : PDKUZM | ~/ussport/perl/perl-git > :> perl Porting/bisect.pl --start 3b6c52ce7d --end 716a866437e -e 'exit > (uc("\x{587}") ne "\x{535}\x{552}");' > This checkout is not clean,

Re: Smoke [blead] v5.26.0-1591-g56e48c1076 FAIL(XM) os/390 25.00 (2964/)

On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 06:09:34AM +, Yaroslav Kuzmin wrote: > No output : This has me almost completely stumped. What about the other thing I asked: > If you do further runs, do you get the same 4 tests consistently failing? That is, if you run the davem2 script multiple times, do you

Re: Smoke [blead] v5.26.0-1591-g56e48c1076 FAIL(XM) os/390 25.00 (2964/)

On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 06:23:47AM +, Yaroslav Kuzmin wrote: > Log available at > https://drive.google.com/file/d/1jGDVWAw-L_ZBZHzfupDKy5uBNRKI9Dm7 Strange. In that run, it is failing four tests. In each

Re: Smoke [blead] v5.26.0-1591-g56e48c1076 FAIL(XM) os/390 25.00 (2964/)

On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 12:52:35PM +, Yaroslav Kuzmin wrote: > > Log availabel at > https://drive.google.com/file/d/1BwOR2pbtYRTJ4TqWMh33FtD9PZahf1HM Unfortunately that run didn't trigger the failure code

Re: Smoke [maint-5.24] v5.24.0-35-geb26183 FAIL(m) linux 4.4.0-30-generic [debian] (x86_64/8 cpu) {maint_clang}

On Sun, Jul 17, 2016 at 11:32:06AM +0100, Steve Hay via daily-build-reports wrote: > On 17 July 2016 at 08:28, George Greer wrote: > > Smoke logs available at > > http://m-l.org/~perl/smoke/perl/linux/maint_clang/logeb261839aabffdf397fb2860ef005d3e2b5fdb41.log.gz > > > >

Re: Smoke [5.23.0] v5.22.0-125-g4b95171 FAIL(M) linux 3.18.14-v7+ [debian] (armv7l/4 cpu)

On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 11:33:37AM +0100, Dave Mitchell wrote: I've just pushed the following for smoking which hopefully fixes it. And now merged into blead with e67e8a4a47a2610450982979717f503914221118. -- Little fly, thy summer's play my thoughtless hand has terminated with extreme

Re: Smoke [5.23.0] v5.22.0-125-g4b95171 FAIL(M) linux 3.18.14-v7+ [debian] (armv7l/4 cpu)

On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 01:12:13PM +0100, Aaron Crane wrote: I'm afraid I can't directly answer those questions, but I have looked into where the problems lie. As far as I can tell, the only thing that fails under -pedantic is Encode. Specifically, Encode's enc2xs program generates files like

Re: Smoke [5.22.0] v5.22.0-RC2-14-g39c7894 FAIL(Mm) linux 3.0.35-cm-fx6-6.1 [debian] (armv7l/4 cpu)

On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 09:55:03AM -0400, Ricardo Signes wrote: * n...@bandsman.co.uk [2015-05-30T01:43:47] Automated smoke report for 5.22.0 patch 39c78947027f4e560101bea5c8bff1993606ccb8 v5.22.0-RC2-14-g39c7894 Locally applied patches: RC2 uncommitted-changes

Re: Smoke [blead] v5.21.4-416-g73f4c4f FAIL(m) linux 3.13.0-36-generic [debian] (x86_64/8 cpu) {blead_g++}

On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 06:54:00AM -0400, George Greer wrote: m - - m - - -Duse64bitall -Accflags=-DPERL_GLOBAL_STRUCT_PRIVATE m - - m - - -Dusemorebits -Accflags=-DPERL_GLOBAL_STRUCT fixed with 727d2dc697cf9ea -- Any [programming] language that doesn't occasionally surprise the novice will

Re: Smoke [smoke-me/davem/elide-null-ops] v5.19.9-121-geacd9c7 FAIL(F) MSWin32 Win2000 SP4 (x86/1 cpu) {smoke-me}

Smoke [smoke-me/davem/elide-null-ops] v5.19.9-121-geacd9c7 Um, that branch (long single merged) was pushed in early March! Is your smoker smoking old branches by mistake? (Although having said, I should have deleted that branch before now. Now deleted). -- Fire extinguisher (n) a device for

Re: Smoke [blead] v5.21.0-75-gee15bb6 FAIL(M) linux 3.11.0-18-generic [debian] (x86_64/8 cpu) {blead_g++_quick}

On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 08:00:04AM -0400, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote: I'm mystified by these failures -- not the Digest::SHA failing to build (which has been already rolled back), but the test failures starting with t/comp/hints, and then followed by many regexp/unicode-related ones. note that

Re: Smoke [blead] v5.19.11-35-gdc396cc FAIL(M) linux 3.11.0-18-generic [debian] (x86_64/8 cpu) {blead_g++_quick}

On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 12:05:16PM -0600, Karl Williamson wrote: With rjbs' permission, I have reverted the Encode 2.60 upgrade so that blead will compile again, and we can properly smoke other patches that are coming along. I've now reverted that revert with 89c2544cd3191, and added the

Re: Smoke [blead] v5.19.11-35-gdc396cc FAIL(M) linux 3.11.0-18-generic [debian] (x86_64/8 cpu) {blead_g++_quick}

On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 07:58:41PM -0500, Craig A. Berry wrote: On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 6:01 PM, Steve Hay steve.m@googlemail.com wrote: On 6 May 2014 21:58, George Greer p...@greerga.m-l.org wrote: Smoke logs available at

Re: Smoke [blead] v5.17.3-299-gc5e8d5c FAIL(XF) linux 3.2.0-30-generic [debian] (x86_64/8 cpu)

On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 11:39:50AM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote: On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 06:37:00AM -0400, George Greer wrote: X X F X X X F X -Accflags=-DPERL_POISON This seems to be a bug in the PERL_POISON code, present since it was added. I'm trying to work out what the correct fix is.

Re: Smoke [blead] v5.13.11-511-gbb7ff74 FAIL(F) MSWin32 Win2000 SP4 (x86/1 cpu)

On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 08:51:04PM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote: ../t/op/sigdispatch.t...FAILED Non-zero exit status: 9 Bad plan. You planned 17 tests but ran 0. I've just pushed this to smoke-me/sigdispatch, in the hope that it cures the

Re: Smoke [5.13.11] v5.13.11-190-g5da6b59 FAIL(F) openbsd 4.8 (i386/1 cpu)

On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 08:49:15PM +0100, Steven Schubiger wrote: Craig A. Berry craig.a.be...@gmail.com wrote: Got any details on that? Any chance it was caused by something recent from this list:

Re: Smoke [5.10.0] maint-5.10-1196-ga8a43ff FAIL(F) linux 2.6.25.18-0.2-default [SuSE] (x86_64/4 cpu)

On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 09:14:50AM +0200, H.Merijn Brand wrote: perl-5.10.x/t 109 ./perl -I../lib harness -v ../lib/CGI/t/fast.t ../lib/CGI/t/fast.t .. 1/7 # Failed test 'checking no active request' # at ../lib/CGI/t/fast.t line 35. # got: undef # expected: '' # Looks like

Re: Smoke [5.10.0] maint-5.10-1196-ga8a43ff FAIL(F) linux 2.6.25.18-0.2-default [SuSE] (x86_64/4 cpu)

On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 03:23:02PM +0200, H.Merijn Brand wrote: On Thu, 28 May 2009 14:01:47 +0100, Dave Mitchell da...@iabyn.com wrote: On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 09:14:50AM +0200, H.Merijn Brand wrote: perl-5.10.x/t 109 ./perl -I../lib harness -v ../lib/CGI/t/fast.t ../lib/CGI/t/fast.t

Re: Smoke [5.10.0] 2009-01-04.00:53:05 FAIL(m) netbsd 4.0 (i386/1 cpu)

On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 11:25:53PM +0100, Abe Timmerman wrote: It'll need the PERL_PATCHNUM stuff in config.SH aswell. Um, what stuff is that? $ ls config.SH ls: cannot access config.SH: No such file or directory $ grep PERL_PATCHNUM `ls| grep -v Changes` cflags:

Re: Smoke [5.10.0] 2009-01-04.00:53:05 FAIL(m) netbsd 4.0 (i386/1 cpu)

On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 11:27:47PM +0100, Abe Timmerman wrote: I'm sorry; didn't look close enough; you're right it should be cflags.SH There has been quite some work on it since the git changeover. Urgh, so there has. I think I might just let smokes continue to fail for another week and

Re: Smoke [5.10.0] 2009-01-04.00:53:05 FAIL(m) netbsd 4.0 (i386/1 cpu)

There seem to be lots of 'm's in 5.10.x smokes recently. Could someone supply me any log output? Ta. On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 03:27:04AM -0800, Steven Schubiger wrote: Automated smoke report for 5.10.0 patch 44815675c4d350844753c67afaecfc558d824452 2009-01-04.00:53:05 p5netbsd: AMD Duron

lack of 5.10.x smoking

Unless my mail filters are hiding them, there seems to be a distinct lack of smoking of the maint-5.10 branch. The only ones I can see in the last month are: Wed 05 Mar 08:45 11K [EMAIL PROTECTED] Smoke [5.10.0] 33412 FAIL(F) linux Mon 10 Mar 03:57 11K [EMAIL PROTECTED] Smoke [5.10.0] 33443

Re: lack of 5.10.x smoking

On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 03:49:26PM +0200, H.Merijn Brand wrote: On Mon, 31 Mar 2008 14:42:28 +0100, Dave Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Unless my mail filters are hiding them, there seems to be a distinct lack of smoking of the maint-5.10 branch. The only ones I can see in the last

Re: Smoke [5.9.4] 28397 FAIL(F) hp-ux 11.23/64 (ia64/2 cpu)

On Sat, Jun 17, 2006 at 11:55:00AM +0200, H.Merijn Brand wrote: Inconsistent test results (between TEST and harness): ../ext/threads/t/blocks.t...FAILED at test 6 This was caused by the interesting fact that a detached thread still counts towards the A thread exited while %d

Re: Smoke [5.9.3] 25079 FAIL(F) AIX 4.3.3.0/ML11 (PPC/1 cpu)

On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 06:21:42PM +0200, H.Merijn Brand wrote: On Tue, 5 Jul 2005 21:07:15 +0100, Dave Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: pp_hot.c, line 2682.9: 1506-235 (W) Incorrect escape sequence \C. \ I'm mystified by this. My recent changes should have removed the macro expansions

Re: Smoke [5.9.3] 25079 FAIL(F) AIX 4.3.3.0/ML11 (PPC/1 cpu)

On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 04:36:00PM +0200, H.Merijn Brand wrote: Automated smoke report for 5.9.3 patch 25079 i2: PPC_604e (PPC/1 cpu) onAIX - 4.3.3.0/ML11 using xlc version 5.0.2.8 smoketime 17 hours 15 minutes (average 2 hours 9 minutes) [snip] Compiler

Re: Smoke [5.9.2] 23450 FAIL(M) MSWin32 WinXP/.Net SP1 (x86/1 cpu)

On Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 11:07:07AM +, Steve Hay wrote: Note that ext/re/re_comp.c is copied from regcomp.c Does anyone know why this is done? It basically recompiles the core regex funtions under new names, and allows them to be called instead of the standard ones. -- The Enterprise

Re: [unPATCH] Re: Smoke [5.8.1] 19076 FAIL(F) openbsd 3.2 (i386/1 cpu)

On Sat, Mar 29, 2003 at 06:58:09PM +, Nicholas Clark wrote: On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 11:12:15AM +, Dave Mitchell wrote: Note that %_ should *not* be used to print SVs containing the names of pad lexicals, since for these the SvCUR() field is hijacked for the generation number