Hi,
I had written the reference implementation for SMIMA experimental draft. So far
that one works very will. I know, one very important discussion was about the
local part, which became SHA256/trunc at the moment.
I am also interested about the other path doing the lookup over a pointer to
se
> Am 02.07.2015 um 17:17 schrieb Patrick Ben Koetter :
>
> We've just released smilla, a SMIMEA aware milter. smilla implements
> draft-ietf-dane-smime as specified by the IETF DANE WG.
>
> The program has been written in Python. It has been in production since April
> 2015 at some ISPs and is c
> Am 30.06.2015 um 02:01 schrieb Paul Wouters :
>
> That's a little unfortunate because we're merging two prototypes millers into
> one. But we'll adapt the smime one based on the same prefix as openpgpkey
I fully agree. I have spent many hours on developing a prototype for SMIMEA.
This code s
> Am 19.06.2015 um 01:56 schrieb John Levine :
>
>> Concerning different things like user@ or user+foo@, CNAME is an option that
>> works.
>
> You can certainly use CNAMEs for aliases, and they will work in tiny
> examples.
>
> Given that there are over 500,000 ways to spell my single
> unexce
> I've been silently following this whole process basically from the
> beginning and I (hope I) read all arguments and understood them. It's
> a difficult topic and most things can't be simply declared "right" or
> "wrong", so I understand why there still are so many disputing
> opinions.
>
> But
> Am 06.04.2015 um 19:18 schrieb Jim Schaad :
>
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: dane [mailto:dane-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Paul Wouters
>> Sent: Monday, April 06, 2015 9:08 AM
>> To: Doug Montgomery
>> Cc: dane@ietf.org
>> Subject: Re: [dane] Updated draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey
> Am 02.04.2015 um 19:33 schrieb Viktor Dukhovni :
>
> On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 07:29:21PM +0200, Christian R??ner wrote:
>
>> I never knew that you can use a public key for signing. Or at least I never
>> tried.
>
> Your initial thinking was right, the private key is used for signing,
> but th
> Am 02.04.2015 um 19:12 schrieb Viktor Dukhovni :
>
> On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 06:52:33PM +0200, Christian R??ner wrote:
>
>>> libsmaug uses these labels (as well as our soon-to-be available
>>> provisioning portal).
>>
>> Just a question for ._encr and ._sign:
>>
>> Do you really plan to sto
> Am 02.04.2015 um 17:08 schrieb Osterweil, Eric :
>
>
> On Apr 2, 2015, at 10:23 AM, Olafur Gudmundsson wrote:
>
>>
>> The drafts will be advanced with the same lookup mechanism.
>> The process is defined in OPENPGP draft, the SMIME draft will follow OPENPGP
>> lead in email address “tran
Hi,
> Latest version: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey-03
> Diff:
> http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey-02&url2=draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey-03
>
> Items changed:
>
> - SHA-224 changed to SHA-256 truncated at 28 octets. It was indicated
> that SHA224
Hi,
> Am 11.12.2014 um 20:51 schrieb Rose, Scott W. :
>
> Realized the other action item I was assigned to from the interim meeting was
> email canonicalization for SMIMEA. I believe it stems from Viktor Dukhovni's
> email to the endymail list:
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/endymail/c
11 matches
Mail list logo
