New submission from Eric Kow [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This sounds scary, so I'm marking it as urgent (happens with latest darcs
unstable 2.0.0pre3) on Ubuntu Linux Gutsy
% darcs get http://mark.stosberg.com/darcs_hive/darcs_speed_test
% darcs what -s
rmfile ./darcs0696OB-new
rmfile ./darcsIWCPDL-new
On Feb 7, 2008, at 12:38 AM, Petr Rockai wrote:
Not sure what OS are you using, but at least Linux will still work if
you are very tight with memory and have no swap. It will just work
extremely slowly, since all it can swap is code pages (which are in
the executables so they don't need extra
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 05:56:52PM -, Mark Stosberg wrote:
Based on the bug tracker activity, my sense is that Darcs 2 is already better
than 1.0.9, with no significant regressions that I'm aware of.
Another major regression is the slowdown of record when adding many
files, which was
New submission from Mark Stosberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This ticket is created to track the release of Darcs 2.0. Other bugs or features
that are blocking the release can associated as superceders. When those are
all resolved, the release should happen.
Based on the bug tracker activity, my sense
On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 08:34:57PM -0700, zooko wrote:
On Feb 6, 2008, at 11:58 AM, David Roundy wrote:
On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 11:29:42AM -0700, zooko wrote:
time tar xjvf ciphercycles-20070205.tar.bz2
Any chance you could write up a little script that generates something
New submission from Nicolas Limare [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
from http://darcs.net/cgi-bin/darcs.cgi/stable/debian?c=patches or
http://darcs.net/cgi-bin/darcs.cgi/stable/debian/?c=patches (note the
trailing slash) you get for the first (oldest) patch a
New submission from Nicolas Limare [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
= Error message =
$ darcs push
Pushing to youkan:/srv/dev/darcs/megawave-4...
darcs: bug in darcs!
fromJust error at Push.lhs:136 compiled 13:47:48 Nov 20 2006
Please report this to [EMAIL
New submission from Nicolas Limare [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
from http://darcs.net/cgi-bin/darcs.cgi/stable/debian?c=patches or
http://darcs.net/cgi-bin/darcs.cgi/stable/debian/?c=patches (note the
trailing slash) you get for the first (oldest) patch a
New submission from Alex Shinn [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
My remote server went down earlier so I couldn't push to the
main repository. Someone else needed a patch I had just
made, so I tried sending it with darcs send --to addr but
I get:
darcs failed: Not a repository: (/_darcs/inventory:
On 07/02/2008, Simon Marlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just updated my darcs2 to try out the new ByteString changes and see if I
could reproduce Erik's results, and I'm seeing a bit regression in the
performance of unpull:
$ darcs2 unpull --from-tag=2007-09-25 -a
134.18s real 128.56s user
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 03:26:09PM +, Simon Marlow wrote:
I just updated my darcs2 to try out the new ByteString changes and see if I
could reproduce Erik's results, and I'm seeing a bit regression in the
performance of unpull:
I'll try to take a look at this tomorrow... I've spent my
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 06:47:08AM -0700, zooko wrote:
Please make sure this is not a memory problem, since otherwise the
timing is fairly worthless (and the issue is really in memory
usage)... Also, checking what kind of load is on the machine (with say
top) could help -- is it
New submission from Nicolas Limare [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
= Error message =
$ darcs push
Pushing to youkan:/srv/dev/darcs/megawave-4...
darcs: bug in darcs!
fromJust error at Push.lhs:136 compiled 13:47:48 Nov 20 2006
Please report this to [EMAIL
Applied. Thanks!
David
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 02:12:12PM -0800, Eric Kow wrote:
Fri Jan 25 23:27:39 GMT 2008 Eric Kow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Fix ChangeLog entry.
Thu Feb 7 21:55:26 GMT 2008 Eric Kow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Pipe 'darcs foo --help' through a pager.
Thu Feb 7 22:09:14
Applied. Thanks!
David
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 02:42:42PM -0800, Jason Dagit wrote:
Quick and dirty hack to add links to the darcs.net webpage.
Please edit as needed.
Thanks,
Jason
Thu Feb 7 14:41:20 PST 2008 Jason Dagit [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Add links to darcs repositories to
New submission from Jason Dagit [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The main darcs webpage at http://darcs.net does not immediately show you where
to get access to the darcs source repositories.
Furthermore, http://darcs.net/repos is not browse-able making it harder to
discover the repositories that are
While the exact use-cases of the pager are still discussed, I noticed that
darcs help command launches a pager, but darcs command --help doesn't.
--
nosy: +salty-horse, wferi -wferi
__
Darcs bug tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.darcs.net/issue610
Hi,
On http://wiki.darcs.net/DarcsWiki/PatchPlugins there is discussion
about different atomic patch types. The page points out that test
files are different from binary files and suggests that those two cases
might be handled adequately. It also points out that XML is different
from both
I should mention that I've found a couple of patterns useful in tracking down
performance bugs:
darcs obliterate --last 100 -a darcs pull -a
darcs unrecord --last 1 -a darcs record -a -m foo
It would be helpful for a benchmarking code to focus on inverse pairs like this,
because they're
Quick and dirty hack to add links to the darcs.net webpage.
Please edit as needed.
Thanks,
Jason
Thu Feb 7 14:41:20 PST 2008 Jason Dagit [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Add links to darcs repositories to main webpage
New patches:
[Add links to darcs repositories to main webpage
Jason Dagit [EMAIL
Thu Feb 7 14:17:06 PST 2008 Jason Dagit [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* amended Depends.lhs for type witnesses
New patches:
[amended Depends.lhs for type witnesses
Jason Dagit [EMAIL PROTECTED]**20080207221706] {
hunk ./src/Darcs/Patch/Depends.lhs 421
\end{code}
\begin{code}
-commute_to_end ::
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 22:27:15 -0500, Mark Stosberg wrote:
Thu Feb 7 22:26:46 EST 2008 Mark Stosberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* issue390: whatsnew 'stats' more files than needed.
strace is not found everywhere, I suggest at the very least skipping
unless
-X my $strace = `which strace`
New submission from Mark Stosberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I'm marking this as urgent because darcs reports this as a bug itself, and it's
rather easy to trigger with the current darcs-unstable.
#!/bin/sh
IFS='';
export IFS;
EMAIL=tester;
export EMAIL;
set -ev;
rm -rf tmp;
darcs init --darcs-2
On Feb 7, 2008, at 1:11 PM, David Roundy wrote:
Thanks for the test case, Zooko, and for pointing out this regression!
Could you rerun your timings when you have pulled this change:
I pulled your latest patches and ran it again and it took around 20
seconds.
Way to go! That is within an
24 matches
Mail list logo
