Re: [darktable-dev] filmic v.4 and exposure compensation bias in git master

2020-06-11 Thread Aurélien Pierre
I need to presume things in order to provide consistent and reasonable workflows from start to end. You get the scene-linear one, based on linear editing with exposure and filmic, and the display-linear one, based on legacy modules and modules order (and base curve), or alternatively, no workflow a

Re: [darktable-dev] filmic v.4 and exposure compensation bias in git master

2020-06-11 Thread Alexander Rabtchevich
You presume a user chooses one of the approaches and uses it full time. In that case the expose is added automatically. And what if a user mostly uses basecurve approach and time after time wants to make a scene-referred variant? He needs to turn off the basecurve, turn on the filmic module (it is

Re: [darktable-dev] Large number of warnings when building dt master

2020-06-11 Thread Jack Bowling
Typo in the original. The command should read: git pull --rebase --recurse-submodules Jack On 2020-06-10 12:23 a.m., Andreas Schneider wrote: On Tuesday, 9 June 2020 23:17:10 CEST Nicolas Auffray wrote: Hi Peter, I just compile last master (so 3.1.0+2031 now) and I don't have any error abou

Re: [darktable-dev] filmic v.4 and exposure compensation bias in git master

2020-06-11 Thread Aurélien Pierre
The required +1 EV exposure boost is now applied automatically in exposure module for new edits if you choose the scene-linear workflow in preferences -> processing -> auto-apply pixel workflow default. Filmic v4 imposes 18% scene to be remapped to 18% display no matter what, resulting in preserva