Here are a few examples of instances where I have had to bypass the
collection module, by manual access to the database or otherwise:
* It is impossible to search for an exact match to a string. If, for
example, I want to search for an image with the exact title "Water", I
cannot exclude images ti
On 1/16/18 3:53 AM, Heiko Bauke wrote:
Nevertheless, I am not fully convinced that darktable requires such a
kind of feature. I am pretty sure that such complex search patterns
emerge from time to time. But for typical use cases the current
collection module is sufficient.
Typical use cases
Am 12.01.2018 um 14:29 schrieb Mark Feit:
A really, really good solution to this would be to dump all available
image metadata into a full-text indexer and allow the user to filter
using queries. Done right, it gives users immense flexibility and saves
having to write and maintain application-sp
On 1/12/18 3:29 AM, Heiko Bauke wrote:
At the moment, one can collect images by specific criteria. Some of
these criteria can be expressed by numerical values, e.g., focal
length or ISO. It would be nice if one could collect not only images
taken at a specific ISO, let's say, but also taken
On 1/12/18 3:29 AM, Heiko Bauke wrote:
At the moment, one can collect images by specific criteria. Some of
these criteria can be expressed by numerical values, e.g., focal
length or ISO. It would be nice if one could collect not only images
taken at a specific ISO, let's say, but also taken
Am 12.01.2018 um 10:19 schrieb Tobias Ellinghaus:
That is already possible, have a look at the tooltip of the entry box in the
collect module.
Wonderful!
Heiko
--
-- Number Crunch Blog @ https://www.numbercrunch.de
-- Cluster Computing @ http://www.clustercomputing.de
-- Profe
Am Freitag, 12. Januar 2018, 09:29:42 CET schrieb Heiko Bauke:
> Hi,
>
> Am 11.01.2018 um 20:05 schrieb Simon Harhues:
> > If it is about selecting images, how about adding export size as filter
> > option for the collection module? Instead of pixels, mm/inch + dpi might
> > be an alternative, alt
Hi,
Am 11.01.2018 um 20:05 schrieb Simon Harhues:
If it is about selecting images, how about adding export size as filter
option for the collection module? Instead of pixels, mm/inch + dpi might
be an alternative, although I have no real idea how to put both in one
drop down.
I totally agree.
Dear Tobias,
Am 11.01.2018 um 19:55 schrieb Tobias Ellinghaus:
> Am Donnerstag, 11. Januar 2018, 19:06:36 CET schrieb Tobias Ellinghaus:
>> Am Donnerstag, 11. Januar 2018, 18:27:32 CET schrieb August Schwerdfeger:
>>> I am often having to sift through large batches of already-processed
>>> photos
Am Donnerstag, 11. Januar 2018, 19:06:36 CET schrieb Tobias Ellinghaus:
> Am Donnerstag, 11. Januar 2018, 18:27:32 CET schrieb August Schwerdfeger:
> > I am often having to sift through large batches of already-processed
> > photos
> > to select some number (for entry into photo shows, etc.). There
Am Donnerstag, 11. Januar 2018, 18:27:32 CET schrieb August Schwerdfeger:
> I am often having to sift through large batches of already-processed photos
> to select some number (for entry into photo shows, etc.). There is usually
> a minimum size requirement involved, and I frequently find myself ha
I am often having to sift through large batches of already-processed photos
to select some number (for entry into photo shows, etc.). There is usually
a minimum size requirement involved, and I frequently find myself having to
go back into the crop module to see whether or not some cropped photo me
Hi,
Am 11.01.2018 um 17:46 schrieb August Schwerdfeger:
If I did that, I still could not determine the size until *after* the
export, by examining the exported image. What I am asking about is a way
to determine the size within Darktable itself, without having to do an
export.
this is corre
If I did that, I still could not determine the size until *after* the
export, by examining the exported image. What I am asking about is a way to
determine the size within Darktable itself, without having to do an export.
--
August Schwerdfeger
aug...@schwerdfeger.name
On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 10:
Hi,
Am 11.01.2018 um 17:10 schrieb August Schwerdfeger:
For me, the use case is determining, in a speedy and convenient manner,
the maximum size at which I can print a cropped photo.
if you want to export at maximal size without upscaling set max size to
zero, or set these dimensions to very
Exactly.
when doing wildlife shots e. g. cropping is quite common. The lighttable
information panel lower left only shows the original RAW size of the
photo, so I have to open the picture in darkroom, go the crop module and
click into the picture to see the figures.
August Schwerdfeger schr
For me, the use case is determining, in a speedy and convenient manner, the
maximum size at which I can print a cropped photo.
--
August Schwerdfeger
aug...@schwerdfeger.name
On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 4:43 AM, Roman Lebedev wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 7:17 AM, August Schwerdfeger
> wrote:
>
On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 7:17 AM, August Schwerdfeger
wrote:
> There is currently no easy way to determine the dimensions of an image after
> processing occurs (i.e., the maximum size at which an image can be exported
> without upscaling). I either have to do the actual export at maximum size,
> or
There is currently no easy way to determine the dimensions of an image
after processing occurs (i.e., the maximum size at which an image can be
exported without upscaling). I either have to do the actual export at
maximum size, or go into darkroom mode, open up the crop module, and try to
hold the
19 matches
Mail list logo
