For reference: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1169695
However, the chances someone fixes this bug are quite low, my
experiences regarding launchpad bugreports are rather bad.
Maybe you better set up a script to create the required symlinks for
you, running ldconfig like suggested by Ulrich did no
Am 16.04.2013 21:27, schrieb David Vincent-Jones:
> Ulrich;
>
> I have moved the 2 missing files into place except do not know how to
> create the link file.
>
> David
Normally it should be sufficient to run program ldconfig as root.
Ulrich
-
Thanks Markus ... this is all a bit over my head and a tad frustrating.
My system may be a bit complicated as I am running Bumblebee in an
effort to achieve good battery performance as well as having the ability
to use OpenCL as needed.
My nvidia.icd appears to have not even been located in the
Ulrich;
I have moved the 2 missing files into place except do not know how to
create the link file.
David
On 13-04-16 08:28 PM, Ulrich Pegelow wrote:
> Am 16.04.2013 19:29, schrieb David Vincent-Jones:
>> I have copies of the link libnvidia-opencl.so.1 located in both
>> /usr/lib/nvidia-current
I am filing a bug report against the ubuntu package right now. It
deletes the nvidia.icd symlink in /etc/ all the time and now it does not
even create sane symlinks for libnvidia-opencl. I just "fixed" the issue
by manually creating a nvidia.icd containing the line
"libnvidia-opencl.so.304.88"
Reg
Am 16.04.2013 19:29, schrieb David Vincent-Jones:
> I have copies of the link libnvidia-opencl.so.1 located in both
> /usr/lib/nvidia-current as well as in /usr/lib32/nvidia-current Both are
> broken links that were to linked to libnvidia-opencl.so.304 84 this
> library no longer exists
> The
Hi,
That's it! Param 'opencl_avoid_atomics' was the solution.
Thanks a lot, you are truly masters :)
greetings,
--
Dariusz
--
Precog is a next-generation analytics platform capable of advanced
analytics on semi-structu
Those links do not exist at my system.
(Ubuntu 12.04 x64, same nvidia driver version)
Regards,
Markus
Am 16.04.2013 19:29, schrieb David Vincent-Jones:
> I have copies of the link libnvidia-opencl.so.1 located in both
> /usr/lib/nvidia-current as well as in /usr/lib32/nvidia-current Both are
>
I have copies of the link libnvidia-opencl.so.1 located in both
/usr/lib/nvidia-current as well as in /usr/lib32/nvidia-current Both are
broken links that were to linked to libnvidia-opencl.so.304 84 this
library no longer exists
The new shared library is (located again in both folders)
li
Hi,
config parameter opencl_avoid_atomics is your friend :)
As Jo has pointed out some of our OpenCL code (bilateral filter) runs
best using a specific non-standard type of atomic operation. If your
hardware does not support this, a slower emulation with standard atomics
is used.
Some systems
awesome, thanks for profiling, pushed to master :)
-jo
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 5:46 PM, Baptiste Pierrat <
baptiste.pier...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi guys!
>
> I have successfully profiled my camera using the tools and method
> described in the blog. You will find the results
> here:
>
> https://d
Hi guys!
I have successfully profiled my camera using the tools and method described
in the blog. You will find the results
here:
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B6APWwFDfvCnamM4SFcyYTVwOGM/edit?usp=sharing
I've tested it on several pictures and also did a few benchmarks; it
effectively increased
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Pascal de Bruijn wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 1:52 PM, johannes hanika
> wrote:
> > [opencl_init] device 0 `GeForce GT 240' doesn't have sm_20 support.
> >
> > that means we can't do atomic float adds in global memory which makes the
> > splat kernel fall back
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 1:52 PM, johannes hanika wrote:
> [opencl_init] device 0 `GeForce GT 240' doesn't have sm_20 support.
>
> that means we can't do atomic float adds in global memory which makes the
> splat kernel fall back to some workaround code which can be terribly slow.
Didn't we have a
The IIs is a different camera, same sensor but lacks the AA filter, so
it isn't surprising that the results differ a bit.
I think it would be great if there was a way to use multiple shotss,
since making them is trivially easy and profiling takes a long time
anyway and is only done once.
On
just to emphasis Pascal's point...
We do not guarentee the integrity of your image or of your database when
using master builds
it seems that currently the database format isn't changed between master
stable, but that might change in the future without notice... and at this
point it will be impos
Hi,
As some of you might be aware, Aldric has been working up a custom
masking implementation which recently got merged into git master,
which means it will likely turn up in Darktable 1.4 in a few month's.
Now, to more clearly differentiate between development versions and
production versions we
[opencl_init] device 0 `GeForce GT 240' doesn't have sm_20 support.
that means we can't do atomic float adds in global memory which makes the
splat kernel fall back to some workaround code which can be terribly slow.
-jo
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Dariusz Duma
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Since 0.x
hi,
thanks for the data! looks like we already had a `k-5 ii s' in the
database, which seems to have a slight amount more noise than yours.
it does make sense to average the samples, i'm not quite sure yet how
though. because we store parameters to a fit where pointwise averaging
would have made
Also see http://darktable.org/redmine/issues/9242
That bug will probably be fixed by this change.
On Mon, 15 Apr 2013 22:20:54 -0700
Daniel Wagenaar wrote:
> In Darktable 1.2 (and perhaps other versions), there is a discrepancy
> between the tooltip for the "core options/demosaicing for zoomed
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 1:16 PM, Dariusz Duma
wrote:
>
>>
>> Which graphics card do you exactly have? How much RAM does it have?
>
> I have NVIDIA GT240 with 1GB RAM. My system has 8GB.
Oh crap, I accidentally took us offlist, sorry about that...
Regards,
Pascal de Bruijn
--
Hi,
Since 0.xx version (1.2 now) I've problems with DT and OpenCL activated.
Everything runs smoothly on CPU (changing parameteres in modules,
preview and so on), and after I turn on OpenCL I can't smoothly operate
with sliders (changing params), preview is freezing for some seconds.
Saying straig
22 matches
Mail list logo
