Re: [darktable-user] A better starting-point for Nikon RAW-files

2016-07-26 Thread I. Ivanov
Is this behavior "Nikon specific"? Does anybody know if Canon behaves the same? Regards, B On 16-07-26 11:41 AM, Vidar Hoel wrote: On 26. juli 2016 20:16, Jean-Luc CECCOLI wrote: Hello, Hi! Just one thing that puzzles me : Nikon ViewNX2 generates a profile for each picture it

Re: [darktable-user] A better starting-point for Nikon RAW-files

2016-07-26 Thread Vidar Hoel
On 26. juli 2016 20:16, Jean-Luc CECCOLI wrote: Hello, Hi! Just one thing that puzzles me : Nikon ViewNX2 generates a profile for each picture it processes, so each profile is based upon the parameters of this picture. Almost. It generates a different profile for each camera setting (it

Re: [darktable-user] A better starting-point for Nikon RAW-files

2016-07-26 Thread Roman Lebedev
Hi. Base curve and input color profile are located *after* the denoise (profiled) in pipe, so they can not interfere with denoise (profiled) in any way... https://www.darktable.org/usermanual/ch03s02.html.php Roman. On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 9:35 PM, Vidar Hoel wrote: >

Re: [darktable-user] A better starting-point for Nikon RAW-files

2016-07-26 Thread Vidar Hoel
Hi, No, I use the "denoise (profiled)" as before, and it works the same way, regardless of what modules (base curve or input color profile) I have applied before. It sure seems like it, anyway. Regards, Vidar Hoel On 26. juli 2016 19:09, Colin Adams wrote: That looks very interesting. But

re: [darktable-user] A better starting-point for Nikon RAW-files

2016-07-26 Thread Jean-Luc CECCOLI
Hello,   Just one thing that puzzles me : Nikon ViewNX2 generates a profile for each picture it processes, so each profile is based upon the parameters of this picture. That would mean that, for each picture, one would have to use the corresponding imported profile, else one might get even

Re: [darktable-user] A better starting-point for Nikon RAW-files

2016-07-26 Thread Colin Adams
That looks very interesting. But I have a question. The image showed much less noise. But can you also use profiled denoise with this approach, or is there an inherent conflict? On Tue, 26 Jul 2016 at 17:45 Vidar Hoel wrote: > Hi, > > some time ago I noticed that the JPGs

Re: [darktable-user] Embedded color profile and sRGB

2016-07-26 Thread Peter Mc Donough
Am 26.07.2016 um 14:49 schrieb Saint Germain: On Tue, 26 Jul 2016 14:38:55 +0200, Peter Mc Donough wrote : Am 26.07.2016 um 13:30 schrieb Riley Brandt: The problem is with Firefox, not darktable. In Firefox, type in "about:config" in the address bar. Then search for

Re: [darktable-user] Embedded color profile and sRGB

2016-07-26 Thread Peter Mc Donough
Am 26.07.2016 um 13:30 schrieb Riley Brandt: The problem is with Firefox, not darktable. In Firefox, type in "about:config" in the address bar. Then search for "color_management" in the search bar at the top. In the line "gfx.color_management.mode" change the Value from "2" to "1". Restart

Re: [darktable-user] Embedded color profile and sRGB

2016-07-26 Thread Riley Brandt
The problem is with Firefox, not darktable. In Firefox, type in "about:config" in the address bar. Then search for "color_management" in the search bar at the top. In the line "gfx.color_management.mode" change the Value from "2" to "1". Restart Firefox. Screenshot: http://imgur.com/a/T68OZ