Hi ,
I use Rapid Photo Downloader 0.9.0a6 installed via python & tar.gz
it is stuck at "probing device" and gives me the following error :
ERRORAn unhandled exception occurred
ERRORTraceback (most recent call last):
File
"/home/alemaire/.local/lib/python3.5/site-packages/raphodo/rapid.py
You may well have already considered these options, but ...
Check whether the camera's USB connection is set to MTP / PTP or Storage.
One or more of these will be correct for your connection to the
workstation, only one of them will work with RPD or Darktable ...
Check to see if the Filing sy
I've only used rapid photo downloader with SD cards. No issues ever.
On Sat, 17 Dec 2016, 12:42 Richard Hobday, wrote:
> You may well have already considered these options, but ...
>
> Check whether the camera's USB connection is set to MTP / PTP or Storage.
>
> One or more of these will be corr
Le 16/12/2016 à 10:43, Adrien le Maire a écrit :
I want to import pictures from my camera in the following sub
directory naming pattern : $(EXIF_YEAR)/$(EXIF_MONTH)/$(EXIF_DAY)
I would do something like
exiftool "-FileNameI like to have time and date encoded in name, so this variant will
re
Am Freitag, 16. Dezember 2016, 12:27:38 CET schrieb François Patte:
> Le 12/12/2016 11:25, Tobias Ellinghaus a écrit :
> > we're proud to announce the fourth release candidate of darktable 2.2.0,
> > with some fixes over the previous release candidate.
> >
> > please test this thoroughly to help u
* Adrien le Maire [12-17-16 04:58]:
> Hi ,
>
> I use Rapid Photo Downloader 0.9.0a6 installed via python & tar.gz
> it is stuck at "probing device" and gives me the following error :
> ERRORAn unhandled exception occurred
> ERRORTraceback (most recent call last):
> File
> "/home/alemair
Hi,
here's an alternative. Shell scripts are, hmm, shell scripts ;-) Doesn't
call external programs, just uses a per module.
#!/usr/bin/perl -w
# Author: Michael Staats (michael.staats at gmx.de)
# Free according to GPL
# $Id: picdate2fn 819 2016-12-17 13:18:00Z michael $
use strict;
use Image::
Hi,
DT 2.0.7 on arch.
When exporting: format jpeg(8bit).
Is there somewhere a table that match the 'quality %' to the Photoshop
steps (1 to 12)?
I've been asked to do value 10 and 6. What would be the equivalent in
DT?
--
sknahT
vyS
_
* darkta...@911networks.com [12-17-16 13:10]:
> Hi,
>
> DT 2.0.7 on arch.
>
> When exporting: format jpeg(8bit).
>
> Is there somewhere a table that match the 'quality %' to the Photoshop
> steps (1 to 12)?
>
> I've been asked to do value 10 and 6. What would be the equivalent in
> DT?
what
On Sat, 17 Dec 2016 13:54:52 -0500
Patrick Shanahan wrote:
>what %'s do the values 10 and 6 represent? one w/o photoshop has no
>knowledge. are the other "steps (1 to 12)" relevant to your request?
>
>one would guess "quality %" would relate to a percentage of 256,
>but ... --
In photoshop:
On 17/12/2016 20:10, darkta...@911networks.com wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Dec 2016 13:54:52 -0500
> Patrick Shanahan wrote:
>
>> what %'s do the values 10 and 6 represent? one w/o photoshop has no
>> knowledge. are the other "steps (1 to 12)" relevant to your request?
>>
>> one would guess "quality %"
Am Sa 17 Dez 2016 10:09:02 CET
schrieb darkta...@911networks.com:
> When exporting: format jpeg(8bit).
>
> Is there somewhere a table that match the 'quality %' to the Photoshop
> steps (1 to 12)?
>
> I've been asked to do value 10 and 6. What would be the equivalent in
> DT?
There is no exac
I agree : transfering data by directly connecting the camera to the computer
may be source of problems.
I'm using a card reader, maybe should you try this instead.
And *don't* use RPD pre-alpha, as not all features are currently implemented.
Current works fine for me (not really, in fact, as th
* darkta...@911networks.com [12-17-16 14:11]:
> On Sat, 17 Dec 2016 13:54:52 -0500
> Patrick Shanahan wrote:
>
> >what %'s do the values 10 and 6 represent? one w/o photoshop has no
> >knowledge. are the other "steps (1 to 12)" relevant to your request?
> >
> >one would guess "quality %" would
Le samedi 17 décembre 2016 à 10:09 -0800, darkta...@911networks.com a
écrit :
> I've been asked to do value 10 and 6. What would be the equivalent in
> DT?
For 10: (10 / 12) * 100 => 83%
For 6: ( 6 / 12) * 100 => 50%
If the Photoshop values ranging from 1 to 12 are not linear across the
qualit
On Sat, 17 Dec 2016 18:37:14 -0500
Patrick Shanahan wrote:
>And WHAT is the actual meaning/value of "1 to 12"? w/o that
>knowledge, *any* answer is mere supposition. bighter than the moon
>but dimmer than the sun.
"I", aka me, don't know what is the meaning of 1 to 12. No idea why
Adobe did it
* darkta...@911networks.com [12-17-16 20:15]:
> On Sat, 17 Dec 2016 18:37:14 -0500
> Patrick Shanahan wrote:
>
> >And WHAT is the actual meaning/value of "1 to 12"? w/o that
> >knowledge, *any* answer is mere supposition. bighter than the moon
> >but dimmer than the sun.
>
> "I", aka me, don'
Hi I Just ran a test to compare the same image on PS and dt and PS 10 was
equal to 91 in dt and PS 6 was equal to dt 70.
This was just one image tested but the file sizes came out the same.
Hope this helps.
Tim.
On Saturday 17 Dec 2016 17:12:16 darkta...@911networks.com wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Dec
18 matches
Mail list logo
