Hi
On 04/02/17 16:59, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
* Francesco Scaglioni [02-04-17 11:50]:
Explain more to me the problem with dt not preserving the directory
structure. And I do not know if dt's moves are recursive, you may need to
move each individual directory.
I can create the new folder st
On dimanche 5 février 2017 09:56:26 CET Francesco Scaglioni wrote:
> Hi
>
> On 04/02/17 16:59, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> > * Francesco Scaglioni [02-04-17 11:50]:
> >
> > Explain more to me the problem with dt not preserving the directory
> > structure. And I do not know if dt's moves are recur
HI,
On 05/02/17 10:41, Remco Viëtor wrote:
On dimanche 5 février 2017 09:56:26 CET Francesco Scaglioni wrote:
Hi
On 04/02/17 16:59, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
* Francesco Scaglioni [02-04-17 11:50]:
Explain more to me the problem with dt not preserving the directory
structure. And I do not kn
* Francesco Scaglioni [02-05-17 04:58]:
> Hi
>
> On 04/02/17 16:59, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> > * Francesco Scaglioni [02-04-17 11:50]:
> >
> > Explain more to me the problem with dt not preserving the directory
> > structure. And I do not know if dt's moves are recursive, you may need to
> >
Hi
If I ask DT to import recursively eg 2013 it will load the images from all
sub-folders. If I then ask DT to copy or move them to a new 2013
destination it will do so but the folder structure below the original 2013
is not recreated in the new target folder and all images end up getting
place
On dimanche 5 février 2017 12:06:29 CET Francesco Scaglioni wrote:
> HI,
>
> On 05/02/17 10:41, Remco Viëtor wrote:
> > On dimanche 5 février 2017 09:56:26 CET Francesco Scaglioni wrote:
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> On 04/02/17 16:59, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> >>> * Francesco Scaglioni [02-04-17 11:50]:
>
On Sun, 5 Feb 2017 12:37:38 +
Francesco Scaglioni wrote:
> Hi
> >>
> >> If I ask DT to import recursively eg 2013 it will load the images
> >> from all sub-folders. If I then ask DT to copy or move them to a
> >> new 2013 destination it will do so but the folder structure below
> >> the orig
Hi
If I ask DT to import recursively eg 2013 it will load the images from all
sub-folders. If I then ask DT to copy or move them to a new 2013
destination it will do so but the folder structure below the original 2013
is not recreated in the new target folder and all images end up getting
placed
Hi
On 05/02/17 13:00, Remco Viëtor wrote:
Does darktable have a problem with symbolic links? If not, why not have:
"/home/me/Photos/2017/..." for current year as direct storage on SSD
"/home/me/Photos/2016" as a symbolic link to "/home/me/media/photos/2016"
?
And the same for 2003--2015, so 14 f
* Francesco Scaglioni [02-05-17 08:19]:
> Hi
> > > If I ask DT to import recursively eg 2013 it will load the images from all
> > > sub-folders. If I then ask DT to copy or move them to a new 2013
> > > destination it will do so but the folder structure below the original 2013
> > > is not recrea
On Sun, 5 Feb 2017 13:18:14 +
Francesco Scaglioni wrote:
>I recreated the folder structure for /home/me/photos/2003
>in /home/me/Media/MediaPhotos/2003
>
>Imported original 2003 recursively in to DT, select all and copy
>to /home/fgs/media/MediaPhotos/2003
>
>All images ended up in home/fgs/m
Hi,
On 05/02/17 17:00, darkta...@911networks.com wrote:
On Sun, 5 Feb 2017 13:18:14 +
Francesco Scaglioni wrote:
I recreated the folder structure for /home/me/photos/2003
in /home/me/Media/MediaPhotos/2003
Imported original 2003 recursively in to DT, select all and copy
to /home/fgs/medi
On Sun, 5 Feb 2017 18:49:52 +
Francesco Scaglioni wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I copied 2016 and 2017 ( with sub-dirs ) to the correct locations.
>Swapped in the " new " DT db ans replaced it with the old one and
>tried the above and ended up with a screen full of skulls (::
>
>However I am not sure exactl
Hi
However I am not sure exactly what the above should achieve ( mu
failing )
The rewrites the folders location in the db. (I tried it once and it
worked for me)
Sounds exactly what I need - need to experiment in a " sandbox " as teh
thought of losing the sync between images and db is scary
Hi All,
I recently had to uninstall AMDGPU-PRO due to some packaging issues (I use
Arch, the others who use it will understand the details of this), and was
forced to use plain AMDGPU. the plain AMDGPU plays nicer with newer kernels
(I have 4.8.13 at the moment), but oepncl support is not as good
I would do one of the following:
1. Use symlinks as suggested by Remco. They work perfectly fine for
darktable. I'm not sure why some people are claiming that DT won't
delete files at symlinks, because it deletes mine just fine. Perhaps
if the actual RAW file is a symlink, it won't delete the
16 matches
Mail list logo
