On 03/01/17 14:44, I. Ivanov wrote:
I stumble on this not too long ago
https://patdavid.net/2013/09/faking-nd-filter-for-long-exposure.html
Perhaps if convert has different options as others pointed it may do the
work. And it works with 16 bit TIFF out of DT.
Regards,
B
On 2017-03-01 07:49
On mercredi 1 mars 2017 15:56:57 CET darkta...@911networks.com wrote:
(...)
>
> I would prefer first merge, then use DT. I can easyly convert the raw
> image to 16-bit TIFFs without any processing.
>
(...)
Well, no, you can't: if you generate a TIFF from your raw, you'll have at least
set the
On Wed, Mar 1, 2017, at 00:31, johannes hanika wrote:
> that's averaging. for star trails/light painting maybe you'd want the
> brightest pixel (and for removal of stuff median etc).
Yes, a few times I've abused this averaging in cases where it wasn't really the
optimal approach, but just
On Wed, 1 Mar 2017 13:20:40 +0100
Stéphane Gourichon wrote:
>Le 01/03/2017 à 06:57, darkta...@911networks.com a écrit :
>
>First, it might not be that off-topic. Are your images raw?
Yes they are raw.
>
>You can consider the merge step being done before or
hi,
On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 8:06 PM, wrote:
> Did you try the "create HDR" function in darktable? It sometimes works well
> for this kind of thing, depending on exactly how much light fell where in
> each shot and the overlap...
that's averaging. for star