Re: [darktable-user] perspective corrections?

On mardi 10 avril 2018 07:22:41 CEST Pascal Obry wrote: > Le mardi 10 avril 2018 à 07:19 +0200, Remco Viëtor a écrit : > > Did you click the little gray "ok" button in the center of the image? > > There is no "ok" for the automatic perspective correction module. Sorry, my mistake, I was thinking

Re: [darktable-user] Highlight Details

On lundi 9 avril 2018 22:26:01 CEST Peter Cripps wrote: > On 04/09/2018 10:28 AM, Timur Irikovich Davletshin wrote: > > Well, did they look the same before reducing exposure? I wonder if > > basecurve is the same in both cases (two options are available in DT). > > Looks like LR does some sort of

Re: [darktable-user] perspective corrections?

Le mardi 10 avril 2018 à 07:19 +0200, Remco Viëtor a écrit : > Did you click the little gray "ok" button in the center of the image? There is no "ok" for the automatic perspective correction module. -- Pascal Obry / Magny Les Hameaux (78) The best way to travel is by means of imagination

Re: [darktable-user] perspective corrections?

On lundi 9 avril 2018 23:25:37 CEST François Patte wrote: > Le 09/04/2018 à 22:45, Pascal Obry a écrit : > > François, > > > >> Bonjour, > > > > Bonsoir, > > > >> I am wondering how to use this module: once the automatic corrections > >> are done, how to save them? If I quit this module the

Re: [darktable-user] perspective corrections?

* François Patte [04-09-18 17:27]: > Le 09/04/2018 à 22:45, Pascal Obry a écrit : > > François, > > > >> Bonjour, > > > > Bonsoir, > > > >> I am wondering how to use this module: once the automatic corrections > >> are done, how to save them? If I quit this

[darktable-user] opencl does not work anymore with 2.4.2 version

Bonjour, I just compiled and installed 2.4.2 version and opencl does not work anymore... : < Message from darktable-cltest 0.027142 [opencl_init] opencl library 'libOpenCL.so.1' found on your system and loaded X server found. dri2 connection failed!

Re: [darktable-user] perspective corrections?

Le 09/04/2018 à 22:45, Pascal Obry a écrit : > François, > >> Bonjour, > > Bonsoir, > >> I am wondering how to use this module: once the automatic corrections >> are done, how to save them? If I quit this module the image falls >> back >> to the previous state and all corrections are lost

Re: [darktable-user] perspective corrections?

François, > Bonjour, Bonsoir, > I am wondering how to use this module: once the automatic corrections > are done, how to save them? If I quit this module the image falls > back > to the previous state and all corrections are lost > > How to use it? Nothing to save. You seem to be using it

Re: [darktable-user] Highlight Details

On 04/09/2018 10:28 AM, Timur Irikovich Davletshin wrote: Well, did they look the same before reducing exposure? I wonder if basecurve is the same in both cases (two options are available in DT). Looks like LR does some sort of highlight reconstruction by default, if you enable LCh

[darktable-user] perspective corrections?

Bonjour, I am wondering how to use this module: once the automatic corrections are done, how to save them? If I quit this module the image falls back to the previous state and all corrections are lost How to use it? Thank you. -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique

Re: [darktable-user] Highlight Details

On 09/04/18 20:35, Remco Viëtor wrote: If it were that simple, we wouldn't have the discussions about importing editing instructions between programs. But in practice, each program has its own tweaks, and its way of doing things. From what I see here, LR does a few things automatically that need

Re: [darktable-user] Highlight Details

On lundi 9 avril 2018 19:28:15 CEST Timur Irikovich Davletshin wrote: > On Mon, 2018-04-09 at 10:06 -0700, Peter Cripps wrote: > > At risk of complicating this discussion, I processed an over-exposed > > RAW > > file in darktable and Lightroom. In both cases, I pulled the > > exposure > > back

Re: [darktable-user] Highlight Details

On 09/04/18 19:28, Timur Irikovich Davletshin wrote: On Mon, 2018-04-09 at 10:06 -0700, Peter Cripps wrote: At risk of complicating this discussion, I processed an over-exposed RAW file in darktable and Lightroom. In both cases, I pulled the exposure back by 2ev. No other tweaks. The results

Re: [darktable-user] Highlight Details

On Mon, 2018-04-09 at 10:06 -0700, Peter Cripps wrote: > At risk of complicating this discussion, I processed an over-exposed > RAW  > file in darktable and Lightroom. In both cases, I pulled the > exposure  > back by 2ev. No other tweaks. The results are quite different, and > seem  > to show

Re: [darktable-user] Highlight Details

At risk of complicating this discussion, I processed an over-exposed RAW file in darktable and Lightroom. In both cases, I pulled the exposure back by 2ev. No other tweaks. The results are quite different, and seem to show that dt is losing some of the high intensity pixels. (I said 'seem

Re: [darktable-user] Highlight Details

On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 7:09 AM, Matthieu Moy wrote: > - Original Message - > > From: "Chris" > > > Seems as though the pink colours appear in my image when I disable > 'highlight > > reconstruction'. > > Yes, this is expected. The module is

Re: [darktable-user] Pentax DNG vs. PEF

On lundi 9 avril 2018 17:43:03 CEST Remco Viëtor wrote: > On lundi 9 avril 2018 17:12:41 CEST Michael Staats wrote: > > Hi > > After extracting the interesting information from the thread on > > Highlight Reconstruction, it is very clear to me that using DNG files > > created by LR are not camera

Re: [darktable-user] Pentax DNG vs. PEF

Am Montag, 9. April 2018, 17:12:41 CEST schrieb Michael Staats: > Hi > After extracting the interesting information from the thread on > Highlight Reconstruction, it is very clear to me that using DNG files > created by LR are not camera raw files and should not be used. > Especially not to

Re: [darktable-user] Pentax DNG vs. PEF

* Timur Irikovich Davletshin [04-09-18 11:48]: > On Mon, 2018-04-09 at 11:30 -0400, Patrick Shanahan wrote: > > * Timur Irikovich Davletshin [04-09-18 > > 11:20]: > > > On Mon, 2018-04-09 at 17:12 +0200, Michael Staats wrote: > > > > Hi > >

Re: [darktable-user] Pentax DNG vs. PEF

On Mon, 2018-04-09 at 11:30 -0400, Patrick Shanahan wrote: > * Timur Irikovich Davletshin [04-09-18 > 11:20]: > > On Mon, 2018-04-09 at 17:12 +0200, Michael Staats wrote: > > > Hi > > > After extracting the interesting information from the thread on > > > Highlight

Re: [darktable-user] Pentax DNG vs. PEF

On lundi 9 avril 2018 17:12:41 CEST Michael Staats wrote: > Hi > After extracting the interesting information from the thread on > Highlight Reconstruction, it is very clear to me that using DNG files > created by LR are not camera raw files and should not be used. > Especially not to compare LR

Re: [darktable-user] Pentax DNG vs. PEF

* Timur Irikovich Davletshin [04-09-18 11:20]: > On Mon, 2018-04-09 at 17:12 +0200, Michael Staats wrote: > > Hi > > After extracting the interesting information from the thread on > > Highlight Reconstruction, it is very clear to me that using DNG files > > created by

Re: [darktable-user] Pentax DNG vs. PEF

* Michael Staats [04-09-18 11:15]: > Hi > After extracting the interesting information from the thread on > Highlight Reconstruction, it is very clear to me that using DNG files > created by LR are not camera raw files and should not be used. > Especially not to compare LR

Re: [darktable-user] Pentax DNG vs. PEF

On Mon, 2018-04-09 at 17:12 +0200, Michael Staats wrote: > Hi > After extracting the interesting information from the thread on > Highlight Reconstruction, it is very clear to me that using DNG files > created by LR are not camera raw files and should not be used. > Especially not to compare LR

[darktable-user] Pentax DNG vs. PEF

Hi After extracting the interesting information from the thread on Highlight Reconstruction, it is very clear to me that using DNG files created by LR are not camera raw files and should not be used. Especially not to compare LR with dt when using different inputs, actually... Fine. Now Pentax

Re: [darktable-user] Highlight Details

Chris, a number of people spent their own time to help you understand the details of your problem. I see a lot of high-quality information in this thread, conveyed in a pretty polite way - definitely not "getting attacked by random people", as you state it. You just need to share your RAW file

Re: [darktable-user] Highlight Details

So glad I asked my question on this mailing list... love getting attacked by random people who never take a minute to try understand the other persons perspective. On Mon, 09 Apr 2018, 06:41 Patrick Shanahan wrote: > * Chris Cunnington [01-01-70

Re: [darktable-user] Highlight Details

* Chris Cunnington [01-01-70 12:34]: > As have been a lot of my replies today... I do not do things blindly, I > work with lossy on purpose and have my reasons which have worked well for > me for over 5 years now. > > but whilst everyone has now decided to point blame at

Re: [darktable-user] Highlight Details

- Original Message - > From: "Chris" > Seems as though the pink colours appear in my image when I disable 'highlight > reconstruction'. Yes, this is expected. The module is precisely here to remove this pink color. > With this disabled the Green & Blue channels

Re: [darktable-user] Highlight Details

Hi Chris, I post a screenshot of a similar problem, showing how I used the color reconstruction module. The screenshot contains a snapshot, so that half the image is the darktable default, including the basecurve. I drag the sliders until I get the best result. Prior to color reconstruction,

Re: [darktable-user] Highlight Details

On lundi 9 avril 2018 08:20:05 CEST Chris Cunnington wrote: > As have been a lot of my replies today... I do not do things blindly, I > work with lossy on purpose and have my reasons which have worked well for > me for over 5 years now. Yes, you will have yuor reasons for a workflow that is valid

Re: [darktable-user] Highlight Details

As have been a lot of my replies today... I do not do things blindly, I work with lossy on purpose and have my reasons which have worked well for me for over 5 years now. but whilst everyone has now decided to point blame at the dng format I think we can stop this thread. As I hoped to learn more

Re: [darktable-user] Highlight Details

Two important things concerning the DNG*) format: 1) Lossless is an option 2) The DNG format also specifies a non-raw format called Linear DNG. See http://www.barrypearson.co.uk/articles/dng/linear.htm If any of the above is in actual play then your results are to be expected. *)

Re: [darktable-user] Highlight Details

Yes, I removed all EXIF data for privacy reasons! On Sun, 08 Apr 2018, 22:42 S. Witt wrote: > Just tried to play with the file. It seems to me that the dng does not > contain raw data at all. Modifying the demosaicing seems to have no > effect, in particular when choosing