On mardi 10 avril 2018 07:22:41 CEST Pascal Obry wrote:
> Le mardi 10 avril 2018 à 07:19 +0200, Remco Viëtor a écrit :
> > Did you click the little gray "ok" button in the center of the image?
>
> There is no "ok" for the automatic perspective correction module.
Sorry, my mistake, I was thinking o
On lundi 9 avril 2018 22:26:01 CEST Peter Cripps wrote:
> On 04/09/2018 10:28 AM, Timur Irikovich Davletshin wrote:
> > Well, did they look the same before reducing exposure? I wonder if
> > basecurve is the same in both cases (two options are available in DT).
> > Looks like LR does some sort of h
Le mardi 10 avril 2018 à 07:19 +0200, Remco Viëtor a écrit :
> Did you click the little gray "ok" button in the center of the image?
There is no "ok" for the automatic perspective correction module.
--
Pascal Obry / Magny Les Hameaux (78)
The best way to travel is by means of imagination
On lundi 9 avril 2018 23:25:37 CEST François Patte wrote:
> Le 09/04/2018 à 22:45, Pascal Obry a écrit :
> > François,
> >
> >> Bonjour,
> >
> > Bonsoir,
> >
> >> I am wondering how to use this module: once the automatic corrections
> >> are done, how to save them? If I quit this module the imag
* François Patte [04-09-18 17:27]:
> Le 09/04/2018 à 22:45, Pascal Obry a écrit :
> > François,
> >
> >> Bonjour,
> >
> > Bonsoir,
> >
> >> I am wondering how to use this module: once the automatic corrections
> >> are done, how to save them? If I quit this module the image falls
> >> back
> >>
Bonjour,
I just compiled and installed 2.4.2 version and opencl does not work
anymore... :
< Message from darktable-cltest
0.027142 [opencl_init] opencl library 'libOpenCL.so.1' found on your
system and loaded
X server found. dri2 connection failed!
DRM_IOCTL_I915_GEM_APERTURE
Le 09/04/2018 à 22:45, Pascal Obry a écrit :
> François,
>
>> Bonjour,
>
> Bonsoir,
>
>> I am wondering how to use this module: once the automatic corrections
>> are done, how to save them? If I quit this module the image falls
>> back
>> to the previous state and all corrections are lost
>>
François,
> Bonjour,
Bonsoir,
> I am wondering how to use this module: once the automatic corrections
> are done, how to save them? If I quit this module the image falls
> back
> to the previous state and all corrections are lost
>
> How to use it?
Nothing to save. You seem to be using it
On 04/09/2018 10:28 AM, Timur Irikovich Davletshin wrote:
Well, did they look the same before reducing exposure? I wonder if
basecurve is the same in both cases (two options are available in DT).
Looks like LR does some sort of highlight reconstruction by default, if
you enable LCh reconstruct
Bonjour,
I am wondering how to use this module: once the automatic corrections
are done, how to save them? If I quit this module the image falls back
to the previous state and all corrections are lost
How to use it?
Thank you.
--
François Patte
UFR de mathématiques et informatique
Laborato
On 09/04/18 20:35, Remco Viëtor wrote:
If it were that simple, we wouldn't have the discussions about importing
editing instructions between programs. But in practice, each program has its
own tweaks, and its way of doing things. From what I see here, LR does a few
things automatically that need
On lundi 9 avril 2018 19:28:15 CEST Timur Irikovich Davletshin wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-04-09 at 10:06 -0700, Peter Cripps wrote:
> > At risk of complicating this discussion, I processed an over-exposed
> > RAW
> > file in darktable and Lightroom. In both cases, I pulled the
> > exposure
> > back by
On 09/04/18 19:28, Timur Irikovich Davletshin wrote:
On Mon, 2018-04-09 at 10:06 -0700, Peter Cripps wrote:
At risk of complicating this discussion, I processed an over-exposed
RAW
file in darktable and Lightroom. In both cases, I pulled the
exposure
back by 2ev. No other tweaks. The results a
On Mon, 2018-04-09 at 10:06 -0700, Peter Cripps wrote:
> At risk of complicating this discussion, I processed an over-exposed
> RAW
> file in darktable and Lightroom. In both cases, I pulled the
> exposure
> back by 2ev. No other tweaks. The results are quite different, and
> seem
> to show that
At risk of complicating this discussion, I processed an over-exposed RAW
file in darktable and Lightroom. In both cases, I pulled the exposure
back by 2ev. No other tweaks. The results are quite different, and seem
to show that dt is losing some of the high intensity pixels.
(I said 'seem to'.
On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 7:09 AM, Matthieu Moy wrote:
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Chris"
>
> > Seems as though the pink colours appear in my image when I disable
> 'highlight
> > reconstruction'.
>
> Yes, this is expected. The module is precisely here to remove this pink
> color.
>
>
On lundi 9 avril 2018 17:43:03 CEST Remco Viëtor wrote:
> On lundi 9 avril 2018 17:12:41 CEST Michael Staats wrote:
> > Hi
> > After extracting the interesting information from the thread on
> > Highlight Reconstruction, it is very clear to me that using DNG files
> > created by LR are not camera r
Am Montag, 9. April 2018, 17:12:41 CEST schrieb Michael Staats:
> Hi
> After extracting the interesting information from the thread on
> Highlight Reconstruction, it is very clear to me that using DNG files
> created by LR are not camera raw files and should not be used.
> Especially not to compare
* Timur Irikovich Davletshin [04-09-18 11:48]:
> On Mon, 2018-04-09 at 11:30 -0400, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> > * Timur Irikovich Davletshin [04-09-18
> > 11:20]:
> > > On Mon, 2018-04-09 at 17:12 +0200, Michael Staats wrote:
> > > > Hi
> > > > After extracting the interesting information from th
On Mon, 2018-04-09 at 11:30 -0400, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> * Timur Irikovich Davletshin [04-09-18
> 11:20]:
> > On Mon, 2018-04-09 at 17:12 +0200, Michael Staats wrote:
> > > Hi
> > > After extracting the interesting information from the thread on
> > > Highlight Reconstruction, it is very clear
On lundi 9 avril 2018 17:12:41 CEST Michael Staats wrote:
> Hi
> After extracting the interesting information from the thread on
> Highlight Reconstruction, it is very clear to me that using DNG files
> created by LR are not camera raw files and should not be used.
> Especially not to compare LR wi
* Timur Irikovich Davletshin [04-09-18 11:20]:
> On Mon, 2018-04-09 at 17:12 +0200, Michael Staats wrote:
> > Hi
> > After extracting the interesting information from the thread on
> > Highlight Reconstruction, it is very clear to me that using DNG files
> > created by LR are not camera raw files
* Michael Staats [04-09-18 11:15]:
> Hi
> After extracting the interesting information from the thread on
> Highlight Reconstruction, it is very clear to me that using DNG files
> created by LR are not camera raw files and should not be used.
> Especially not to compare LR with dt when using diffe
On Mon, 2018-04-09 at 17:12 +0200, Michael Staats wrote:
> Hi
> After extracting the interesting information from the thread on
> Highlight Reconstruction, it is very clear to me that using DNG files
> created by LR are not camera raw files and should not be used.
> Especially not to compare LR wit
Hi
After extracting the interesting information from the thread on
Highlight Reconstruction, it is very clear to me that using DNG files
created by LR are not camera raw files and should not be used.
Especially not to compare LR with dt when using different inputs,
actually...
Fine.
Now Pentax DS
Chris,
a number of people spent their own time to help you understand the details
of your problem. I see a lot of high-quality information in this thread,
conveyed in a pretty polite way - definitely not "getting attacked by
random people", as you state it. You just need to share your RAW file and
So glad I asked my question on this mailing list... love getting attacked
by random people who never take a minute to try understand the other
persons perspective.
On Mon, 09 Apr 2018, 06:41 Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> * Chris Cunnington [01-01-70 12:34]:
> > As have been a lot of my replies toda
* Chris Cunnington [01-01-70 12:34]:
> As have been a lot of my replies today... I do not do things blindly, I
> work with lossy on purpose and have my reasons which have worked well for
> me for over 5 years now.
>
> but whilst everyone has now decided to point blame at the dng format I
> think
- Original Message -
> From: "Chris"
> Seems as though the pink colours appear in my image when I disable 'highlight
> reconstruction'.
Yes, this is expected. The module is precisely here to remove this pink color.
> With this disabled the Green & Blue channels have a lot less
> data in
Hi Chris,
I post a screenshot of a similar problem, showing how I used the color
reconstruction module. The screenshot contains a snapshot, so that half the
image is the darktable default, including the basecurve.
I drag the sliders until I get the best result.
Prior to color reconstruction, I
On lundi 9 avril 2018 08:20:05 CEST Chris Cunnington wrote:
> As have been a lot of my replies today... I do not do things blindly, I
> work with lossy on purpose and have my reasons which have worked well for
> me for over 5 years now.
Yes, you will have yuor reasons for a workflow that is valid w
31 matches
Mail list logo
