> On 20 Jul 2021, at 16:03, darkta...@911networks.com wrote:
>
> On Tue, 20 Jul 2021 08:03:18 +0100
> Robert Bridge wrote:
>
>> Why don't you have the technical ability to do so? Building
>> darktable is reasonably well documented, are you having problems
&
Hi Michael,
Why don't you have the technical ability to do so? Building darktable is
reasonably well documented, are you having problems with the build?
Cheers,
Robert.
On Mon, 19 Jul 2021 at 18:25, Michael wrote:
> Does anyone have the willingness and time to maintain darktable in the
>
If a camera is not supported currently, it will mostly depend on support being
added to relevant libraries. Is it currently supported by any of the open
source applications or libraries? Once support exists, it is a lot easier to
port around, if needed.
That said, I personally wouldn’t buy a
It is a regular topic of conversation, along with related DAM matters.
However, there isn't really a spec for what is needed/wanted, nor is anyone
stepping up to write such a spec, or design and implement a solution.
On Sun, 5 Jul 2020 at 14:53, Guillermo Rozas wrote:
> I would love and support
It comes up as a frequent topic. The thing about the file management
aspects is they are a small and relatively trivial subset of a far bigger
question: Digital Asset Management.
Currently darktable core has a basic DAM capability. Is it something that
can be improved? Yes. Is it something that
