On Thu, Dec 12, 2019, at 12:57, Аl Воgnеr wrote:
> Am Wed, 11 Dec 2019 21:36:41 -0800
> After searching the net, I found
>
> 1.53
>
> And I have no idea, if this makes a difference.
No practical difference for this case, since the camera and lens profiles will
always be used with together,
Am Thu, 12 Dec 2019 21:57:43 +0100
schrieb Аl Воgnеr :
> Since I do not have a test photo, which was never used, I cannot say
> it works for sure, but I removed the xmp-file and cleaned the
> database. It is different to my experiences.
>
> I will give you feedback again, when I get a new test ph
* Аl Воgnеr [12-12-19 16:01]:
> Am Wed, 11 Dec 2019 21:36:41 -0800
> schrieb jys :
>
> > On Fri, Dec 6, 2019, at 16:23, Аl Воgnеr wrote:
> >
> > > My lens-configuration is based on this post:
> > > https://github.com/lensfun/lensfun/issues/895
> >
> > I cleaned up the profile from that upload,
Am Wed, 11 Dec 2019 21:36:41 -0800
schrieb jys :
> On Fri, Dec 6, 2019, at 16:23, Аl Воgnеr wrote:
>
> > My lens-configuration is based on this post:
> > https://github.com/lensfun/lensfun/issues/895
>
> I cleaned up the profile from that upload, see attachment. If you can
> test it and report,
On Fri, Dec 6, 2019, at 16:23, Аl Воgnеr wrote:
> My lens-configuration is based on this post:
> https://github.com/lensfun/lensfun/issues/895
I cleaned up the profile from that upload, see attachment. If you can test it
and report, I'll add it to the database.
(There are some specific little t
On Sun, Dec 8, 2019, at 15:29, William Ferguson wrote:
> I've never tried the script against an image with no identity. I'll
> have to "create" one and see what happens.
My approach is to use a metadata field which can be set in-camera, and which I
don't use otherwise, by setting it to a numb
I've never tried the script against an image with no identity. I'll have
to "create" one and see what happens.
The Super-Takumar 50mm f1.4 is in the lensfun database.
Bill
On Sun, Dec 8, 2019 at 11:07 AM Anton Aylward
wrote:
> On 07/12/2019 21:14, William Ferguson wrote:
> > There is a way to
On 07/12/2019 21:14, William Ferguson wrote:
> There is a way to work around the mis or non identification of lenses.
>
> I've written a lua script to correct the lens information in the image
> database.
Oh WOW!
This might be a route to soling a problem I have.
I favour using 'antique' lenses.
There is a way to work around the mis or non identification of lenses.
I've written a lua script to correct the lens information in the image
database.
It works by scanning selected images for the lens string. You can specify
a replacement lens
string for any incorrect lens string. Once the rep
Am Sat, 7 Dec 2019 09:23:52 +0100
schrieb Hervé Sainct :
Hi,
> Maybe, before asking for redesigning DT withanother library than exiv2
> 'because in that distro it's old', I'd manually install a more recent
> exiv2. Did you check what's available in Synaptic, possibly adding a
> repo?
Do you talk
Maybe, before asking for redesigning DT withanother library than exiv2
'because in that distro it's old', I'd manually install a more recent
exiv2. Did you check what's available in Synaptic, possibly adding a repo?
H.
Le 07/12/2019 à 01:23, Аl Воgnеr a écrit :
> The problem with Ubuntu is, that
Hi, I do.
I compiled exiv2 on Ubuntu 19.10 without any Problem.
Cheers
Dave
Аl Воgnеr schrieb am Sa., 7. Dez. 2019, 01:24:
> I try to use DNG-files from a Ricoh GR III with
> darktable 2.6.3~git2.22c690a53 (from OBS) and Ubuntu 19.10
>
> GR III-lens is not recognized automatically, but the came
I try to use DNG-files from a Ricoh GR III with
darktable 2.6.3~git2.22c690a53 (from OBS) and Ubuntu 19.10
GR III-lens is not recognized automatically, but the camera itself is.
After discussing this in the lensfun-maillinglist it could be that is
not very much related to lensfun, but maybe to Ub
13 matches
Mail list logo
