On Sun, 25 Nov 2018 16:05:05 +0100 (CET)
Jean-Luc CECCOLI
wrote:
> And apologizes if I come there a bit late,
> but... in my mind, 100% means that the output
> file is the exact reflect of the input one.
> So, importing a picture with 45% compression
> ratio and exporting it at 100% would result
> Message du 03/11/18 22:38
> De : "Ricardo Kozmate.Net"
> A : darktable-user@lists.darktable.org
> Copie à :
> Objet : Re: [darktable-user] JPEG quality idea: default to use quantization
> table from JPEG original when applicable.
>
> Em 03/11/18
Em 03/11/18 18:11, Stéphane Gourichon escreveu:
[...]
So, how about implementing, like GIMP does, an option like this:
[✔] Use quality settings from original image (when available)
I rarely work on JPEG source, preferring RAW except on very specific
cases, but it makes sense and indeed I
* Michael Below [11-03-18 16:19]:
> Hi,
>
> Am Samstag, den 03.11.2018, 19:11 +0100 schrieb Stéphane Gourichon:
> > Applying the principle of least surprise invites me to suggest an
> > idea: defaulting to roughly same image file weight.
> > # Idea, with details
> > So, how about implementing,
Hi everyone,
# Context
Recently on this mailing list a user was surprised to import JPEG in
darktable then export them and see a huge difference in file weight
(byte count). This violates the principle of least surprise, also known
as
