Am 17.01.2020 um 15:09 schrieb Christian:
Am 16.01.2020 um 23:02 schrieb Anna Simon:
You could probably make darktable faster if you install a Linux distro
such as Ubuntu and the Intel Neo OpenCL driver. Intel Neo is not
available (compiled) for every distro.
From my experience darktable is
Am 16.01.2020 um 22:20 schrieb KOVÁCS István:
BTW, are you aware of this video? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=InsCJAPSdjI
Thanks for this.
The developer wrote in the comments concerning performance:
rawfiner> "If non local means is too slow for you, switch to wavelets
mode. Or you can
Am 17.01.2020 um 15:09 schrieb Christian:
From my experience darktable is slower on Windows, even with OpenCL
I will test on my manjaro-laptop as soon as DT3 is available
in the repo.
OpenCL is unfortunately not available on my machines (too old).
Ok, DT3 is already available in the
Isn't this blacklisted in darktable any more?
https://www.mail-archive.com/darktable-user@lists.darktable.org/msg07819.html
--
regards
Bernhard
https://www.bilddateien.de
Anna Simon schrieb am 16.01.20 um 23:02:
You could probably make darktable faster if you install a Linux distro
such as
Am 16.01.2020 um 23:02 schrieb Anna Simon:
You could probably make darktable faster if you install a Linux distro
such as Ubuntu and the Intel Neo OpenCL driver. Intel Neo is not
available (compiled) for every distro.
From my experience darktable is slower on Windows, even with OpenCL
Hi,
I
You could probably make darktable faster if you install a Linux distro
such as Ubuntu and the Intel Neo OpenCL driver. Intel Neo is not
available (compiled) for every distro.
From my experience darktable is slower on Windows, even with OpenCL
On 16.01.20 17:27, Christian wrote:
Am 16.01.2020
Hi,
On a 16-megapixel Nikon raw, with a 12-year-old PC (Core2 Duo, 4 GB
RAM), but with a current graphics card (NVidia 1660/6GB) and OpenCL,
'denoise (profiled)' at default settings:
299.756594 [dev_pixelpipe] took 2.312 secs (1.768 CPU) processed
`denoise (profiled)' on GPU, blended on GPU
You might have a look at
https://darktable.gitlab.io/doc/en/overview_chapter.html#darktable_commandline_parameters
$ darktable -d perf
This is a sample output:10,301655 [dev] took 0,321 secs (0,568 CPU) to
load the image.
10,389857 [export] creating pixelpipe took 0,072 secs (0,135 CPU)
Am 16.01.2020 um 14:45 schrieb Remco Viëtor:
No real reason to doubt his values
but...
On 16.01.20 11:09, Christian wrote:
Hi,
can you confirm that the profiled-denoise is very slow
with the default settings?
My measurement (exporting 1 image):
denoise off: 7.3 s
raw denoise: 8.5 s
denoise
On jeudi 16 janvier 2020 13:59:30 CET Anna Simon wrote:
> What kind of computer are you using?
>
> I can definitely confirm that denoise profiled non-local is slower that
> denoise profiled luma/chroma preset. So the difference you have measured
> is probably correct.
>
No real reason to doubt
What kind of computer are you using?
I can definitely confirm that denoise profiled non-local is slower that
denoise profiled luma/chroma preset. So the difference you have measured
is probably correct.
On 16.01.20 11:09, Christian wrote:
Hi,
can you confirm that the profiled-denoise is very
Hi all,I don't have any heavy lifting GPUs, but in DT 3.0 I find denoise works
fast, Athlon something, 24Gb RAM.AndrewSent from Samsung tablet.
Original message From: Christian Date:
16/1/20 9:13 pm (GMT+10:00) To: darktable-user@lists.darktable.org Subject:
[darktable-user]
12 matches
Mail list logo
