On 7 March 2013 23:34, J. Paul Bissonnette wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Mar 2013 23:02:01 +0200
Thanks for your answer Jose,
> In Lighttable
> export select target Flickr Webablum
> Flickr User name
> click Login.
That I have done.
>you should then get a popup with "darktable
> wants to link to your Fli
To be fair, that won't work for Flickr unless you have already
authenticated with it. They have dropped support for his old auth
schema, and they use oAuth 1.0 now, but the library giving us flickr
support 1) has to be updated in your system 2) has a bug that prevents
a new user to log in.
Faceboo
On Thu, 7 Mar 2013 23:02:01 +0200
Johann Spies wrote:
> I cannot figure out how to use export to place photo's in flickr,
> picasa or facebook.
>
> According to the popup in Darktable I must authorize the program in
> Flickr or facebook, but how do I do that? There is nothing in either
> Facebo
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 10:25 PM, Hans Petter Birkeland
wrote:
> Does anybody know where I can get a deb-package of Lensfun 0.2.7 for Ubuntu
> 12.04?
I have Lensfun 0.2.7 on my Darktable-Unstable-PPA for Ubuntu Quantal.
I will NOT push it for Precise.
I won't push it to the release PPAs because L
Does anybody know where I can get a deb-package of Lensfun 0.2.7 for Ubuntu
12.04? I have the .tar.gz from the Lensfun website but I don't understand a
word of the building instructions.
I have tried to google for it with no results. Is there a PPA anywhere, or
maybe one of you have a deb or maybe
I cannot figure out how to use export to place photo's in flickr,
picasa or facebook.
According to the popup in Darktable I must authorize the program in
Flickr or facebook, but how do I do that? There is nothing in either
Facebook or Flickr that gives me a hint on how to do it. With the
facebook
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 12:03 AM, Pascal de Bruijn wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Tobias Ellinghaus wrote:
>> Am Donnerstag, 7. März 2013, 10:24:23 schrub Rob Z. Smith:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> it seems
>>> factually incorrect to describe a raw file as a tif.
>>
>> The sad truth is that it's
Am 07.03.2013 18:56, schrieb Alexander Wagner:
>> The second issue is our already quite cluttered GUI. If we want to offer
>> this option we need to have another GUI element to activate
>> single-channel display and we need some option to select which of the up
>> to 14 single channels to show.
>
>
Am Donnerstag, 7. März 2013, 20:24:41 schrub Kasun Chathuranga:
[...]
> How about dt to have control of meta data which is going to export. I
> mean selecting during export process.
http://darktable.org/redmine/issues/8421
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
---
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 8:24 AM, Kasun Chathuranga wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-03-07 at 19:03 +0100, Alexander Wagner wrote:
>>
>> On 03/04/2013 09:45 PM, johannes hanika wrote:
>> > exiftool -all= *.jpg
>> >
>> > will strip all metadata. there's probably also a switch to only remove
>> > the xmp stuff,
On Thu, 2013-03-07 at 19:03 +0100, Alexander Wagner wrote:
>
> On 03/04/2013 09:45 PM, johannes hanika wrote:
> > exiftool -all= *.jpg
> >
> > will strip all metadata. there's probably also a switch to only remove
> > the xmp stuff, not the exif one.
>
> exiftool -XMP:All=
>
> should do that tri
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 8:52 AM, Russell Edwards wrote:
> On 2013-03-07 04:36, Pascal de Bruijn wrote:
>>
>> The base problem you're likely having is the missing camera definition
>> for the K-5 II... I've attached an file you can locally place in
>> ~/.local/share/lensfun
>
> OK... that "worked",
On 03/04/2013 09:45 PM, johannes hanika wrote:
> exiftool -all= *.jpg
>
> will strip all metadata. there's probably also a switch to only remove
> the xmp stuff, not the exif one.
exiftool -XMP:All=
should do that trick. However, I wonder, as dt stores all metadata to
XMP, my feeling is that o
On 03/05/2013 06:20 PM, Ulrich Pegelow wrote:
Hi!
> Under the hood this would be quite easy to implement. Not for 1.2,
> because it would violate string freeze.
I didn't think of a specific release here.
[...]
> The second issue is our already quite cluttered GUI. If we want to offer
> this opt
2013/3/7 Rob Z. Smith :
> Is that a setting you can easily change in the camera? If so it’s
> something I would change pronto myself as (apart from the difficulties
> caused in distinguishing between raws and exported files) it seems factually
> incorrect to describe a raw file as a tif.
Right!
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Tobias Ellinghaus wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 7. März 2013, 10:24:23 schrub Rob Z. Smith:
>
> [...]
>
>> it seems
>> factually incorrect to describe a raw file as a tif.
>
> The sad truth is that it's actually correct. At least for most RAW formats. :(
Not quite... RA
Am Donnerstag, 7. März 2013, 10:24:23 schrub Rob Z. Smith:
[...]
> it seems
> factually incorrect to describe a raw file as a tif.
The sad truth is that it's actually correct. At least for most RAW formats. :(
> Rob.
Tobias
[...]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message
Hi Doug,
Is that a setting you can easily change in the camera? If so it's something I
would change pronto myself as (apart from the difficulties caused in
distinguishing between raws and exported files) it seems factually incorrect to
describe a raw file as a tif.
Rob.
From: Doug Gentges
18 matches
Mail list logo
