Re: [Darktable-users] Blending operators

It depends on what you want to achieve. Blend modes can be used for some special effects, like increasing contrast by using softlight with any module. If it increases contrast too much you can pull it down with the opacity slider. You can also do sharpening by blending the high pass module with ove

Re: [Darktable-users] Lightable performance tuning

Yes more RAM is a cheap way to get higher performance, but due to OpenCL, a better graphics card may make more difference, and not just in thumbnail generation. On 20 May 2013 04:35, Derek Kite wrote: > I found that increasing to 16 gb of memory made a difference. My works > flow is to edit the

Re: [Darktable-users] Lightable performance tuning

I found that increasing to 16 gb of memory made a difference. My works flow is to edit the image, switch to light table to save. With 8 gb I would have to wait till the thumbnail was rendered, which would be seconds. With 16gb it its almost instantaneous. On May 19, 2013 12:38 PM, "Emmanuel Lacour"

Re: [Darktable-users] Lightable performance tuning

Hi, as a highly performant OpenCL device consider a Radeon HD7950 or better. Ulrich Von meinem iPad gesendet Am 19.05.2013 um 21:38 schrieb Emmanuel Lacour : > Dear DT users, hackers, > > I start to be tired of the LT thumbnail generation time on my computer. > > Here is my HW setup: > > -

Re: [Darktable-users] Lightable performance tuning

On 19/05/2013 22:09, Anocha yimsiriwattana wrote: > Just wonder what version of DT you are using? > You're right, I forgot this. I'm running git master. -- AlienVault Unified Security Management (USM) platform delivers c

Re: [Darktable-users] Lightable performance tuning

I found version 1.2.x and 1.3.x have much better preformance on generating thumbnail than 1.1.x. On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Anocha yimsiriwattana wrote: > Just wonder what version of DT you are using? > > > On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Emmanuel Lacour wrote: > >> Dear DT users, hackers

Re: [Darktable-users] Lightable performance tuning

Just wonder what version of DT you are using? On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Emmanuel Lacour wrote: > Dear DT users, hackers, > > I start to be tired of the LT thumbnail generation time on my computer. > > Here is my HW setup: > > - images files on a standard SATA drive > - OS, .config, .cache

[Darktable-users] Lightable performance tuning

Dear DT users, hackers, I start to be tired of the LT thumbnail generation time on my computer. Here is my HW setup: - images files on a standard SATA drive - OS, .config, .cache on an SSD drive - Memory: 8Go - CPU: AMD Phenom(tm) II X4 965 Processor (4 coeurs) - Graphic card: embedded ATI RS780

Re: [Darktable-users] watermark under mac

Ok but thi sdirectory doesn't exist, found the solutin, i've create it and put in it my svg, that works Le 19/05/13 19:22, Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo a écrit : > On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 9:54 AM, Cristofoto wrote: >> Hello, >> i'm using darktable under imac, >> to add a watermark to my photo, where d

Re: [Darktable-users] watermark under mac

On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 9:54 AM, Cristofoto wrote: > > Hello, > i'm using darktable under imac, > to add a watermark to my photo, where do i put the svg ? Under ~/.config/darktable/watermarks/ -- José Carlos García Sogo jcs...@gmail.com ---

[Darktable-users] watermark under mac

Hello, i'm using darktable under imac, to add a watermark to my photo, where do i put the svg ? thanks -- AlienVault Unified Security Management (USM) platform delivers complete security visibility with the essential secu

Re: [Darktable-users] Blending operators

2013/5/19 johannes hanika > most operations in darktable are `unbounded'. that is, they don't care > about color gamut or hdr content and just accept all input, compute with > it, and will output super-wide-gamut high dynamic range values again (hence > unbounded). > > the old blending mode `norm

Re: [Darktable-users] Blending operators

most operations in darktable are `unbounded'. that is, they don't care about color gamut or hdr content and just accept all input, compute with it, and will output super-wide-gamut high dynamic range values again (hence unbounded). the old blending mode `normal' was cutting off your values at some

Re: [Darktable-users] Blending operators

2013/5/19 johannes hanika > a clamp(x, 0,1) (with different bounds for Lab/rgb). > > -jo > ??? -- Hasta proxima Bartokk Gpg public key: 0x73E5AEA3 -- AlienVault Unified Security Management (USM) platform deliver

Re: [Darktable-users] Blending operators

a clamp(x, 0,1) (with different bounds for Lab/rgb). -jo On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 4:30 AM, bartokk wrote: > Hi all, > which is the difference between Normal an Normal bounded in Blending > operators? > > -- > Hasta proxima > > Bartokk > > Gpg public key: 0x73E5AEA3 > > > ---

[Darktable-users] Blending operators

Hi all, which is the difference between Normal an Normal bounded in Blending operators? -- Hasta proxima Bartokk Gpg public key: 0x73E5AEA3 -- AlienVault Unified Security Management (USM) platform delivers complete secu

[Darktable-users] Latest stable loose jpg folder names as film rolls

Hi All, I had ubuntu configured to start darktable for images. I guess something went wrong with that. I now have a lot of empty fimrolls with the name of a jpeg referring to the /run/user/... file path. Normally empty fimrolls are deleted. Now however they remain. Possible due to some strange c

Re: [Darktable-users] Feature Request/Discussion

Hallöchen! Kevin writes: > [...] > > And, as a final word: One of the senior developers has already > stated that any such facility will not be provided. So these > ongoing discussing are, as we say in Australia, "flogging a dead > horse". Here, I disagree. Apart from the slight annoyance that