On Wed, Jul 31, 2013, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
>
> Many undesirable things can and will happen if you are not thinking about
> what you are doing. And it is necessary to understand the operation of
> the software you are using. But this is universal, would you prefer the
> windoz way, question: "D
2013/8/1 Richard Wonka
>
>
> On another note, hovering over images has caused quite a lot of
> time-consuming fixing of mistakes, trying to undo and - mainly -
> discussions. I would like to add to that (sic!) and suggest that hover mode
> allows viewing information on an image, but actions are _
2013/8/1 Patrick Shanahan
> would you prefer the
> windoz way, question: "Do you really want to do ?", at every
> step of the way?
>
> Not for everything of course, but it would be safer in case of some mass
destructive operations, such as delete, remove, move, etc. especially when
they are done
Having seen similar discussions in the past, I agree with HaJo:
--
> However, as good as it is in the image processing modules, I find it
lacking some matching quality in UI/functionality design. I have the
feeling that the developers focus on image processing and consider the UI
as a
* Chris Siebenmann [07-31-13 21:29]:
> A general thought sparked by this thread: maybe part of the problem is
> that it is not obvious when images are selected and thus how many images
> will be affected by an operation? I know that I sometimes have problems
> telling apart selected / unselected
A general thought sparked by this thread: maybe part of the problem is
that it is not obvious when images are selected and thus how many images
will be affected by an operation? I know that I sometimes have problems
telling apart selected / unselected / hovered over on the lighttable and
I've some
My sentiments are similar; prior to my first use of RAW format images a few
months ago, I would never have suspected that anything as good as Darktable
existed for open-source RAW development, and I'm very grateful to have it. But
I also find myself having to think about odd things such as where
Good afternoon. I've spoken to this before so I hope no one thinks I'm
being overly critical of Darktable. I absolutely love the program and
consider myself very fortunate to have it. It's all I use or need.
I think the last time I wrote, I'd asked for and received assistance trying
to restore the
>
>
> We are depending on the software to determine our intelligence and
> awareness of a situation that we create? I *know* that I have a selection
> made, after all, I made it on purpose. I can delete multiple items,
> selected items, with only a single item displayed And I *want* this
>
* Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo [07-31-13 17:17]:
> El 31/07/2013 23:02, "Pascal Obry" escribió:
> >
> > Le 31/07/2013 21:43, Patrick Shanahan a écrit :
> > > I do wonder though, the purpose in selecting a group of images is to
> > > perform some action on those images. Why am I not capable of
> > > u
El 31/07/2013 23:02, "Pascal Obry" escribió:
>
> Le 31/07/2013 21:43, Patrick Shanahan a écrit :
> > I do wonder though, the purpose in selecting a group of images is to
> > perform some action on those images. Why am I not capable of
> > understanding that I have multiple items selected despite
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 11:11 PM, Gert van der Plas - Schrama
wrote:
> I'd prefere to have the keystroke z-ctrl for a small 200% magnifier
> window as I already would be holding the 'z' key for the full preview
> in lightroom. The idea of being able to asses the sharpness of focus
> of a compositi
Le 31/07/2013 21:43, Patrick Shanahan a écrit :
> I do wonder though, the purpose in selecting a group of images is to
> perform some action on those images. Why am I not capable of
> understanding that I have multiple items selected despite choosing to only
> display one item? And why is one or
I'm curious about *why* this shouldn't be a configuration checkbox, since it's
only a UI behavior option, and wouldn't have implications for
backwards/forwards compatibility. It seems like something that makes sense for
some people and not for others.
Aside from that, a status message when zoom
2013/7/31 Patrick Shanahan
> I do wonder though, the purpose in selecting a group of images is to
> perform some action on those images. Why am I not capable of
> understanding that I have multiple items selected despite choosing to only
> display one item? And why is one or two particular acti
Am 31.07.2013 21:43, schrieb Patrick Shanahan:
> * Tobias Ellinghaus [07-31-13 12:26]:
>> Am Mittwoch, 31. Juli 2013, 18:03:17 schrieb Pierre Le Magourou:
>>> Hello,
>>
>> Hi.
>>
>> [Discussion about actions only working on one image when zoom level == 1]
>>
>> There is an important difference bet
* Tobias Ellinghaus [07-31-13 12:26]:
> Am Mittwoch, 31. Juli 2013, 18:03:17 schrieb Pierre Le Magourou:
> > Hello,
>
> Hi.
>
> [Discussion about actions only working on one image when zoom level == 1]
>
> There is an important difference between actions like rating, rotation, ...
> and
> exp
Am Mittwoch, 31. Juli 2013, 18:03:17 schrieb Pierre Le Magourou:
> Hello,
Hi.
[Discussion about actions only working on one image when zoom level == 1]
There is an important difference between actions like rating, rotation, ... and
export: The latter doesn't work on the image but with the image
Hello,
> > This seems *more* counter-intuitive than *not* performing an expected
> > > operation on all *selected* items, or is it limited only to exporting,
> > > which would be even more counter-intuitive? Isn't the selection
> > > process/action designed to limit actions to a *selection*? And
| I hope I am not missing the point? In LT, why not decrease the number
| of images on the light table by rotating the thumb wheel on the mouse
| until one image fills the whole central part of the screen? That is
| what I do to perform a quick screening of a collection of images. Then
| I use the
Message original
Objet : Rép: Re: [Darktable-users] 100% view in light table
De : Emmanuel Lacour
À : Christian Iuga
Cc :
I also would ligne 100% zoom with ability toi compare multiple pictures to
compare small détails or sharpness. What avoir creating another screen (there
Hi,
Yes i confirm, sometime is usefull to do a zoom on the picture (like 50% or
100% on the image)
i understand the main problem as it's slow to proceed the raw file so it's
not done on LR.
*It's possible to process only a part of the raw image* "for real" ?
If yes, why not create a shorcut,
22 matches
Mail list logo
