I am not really sure what others see as a problem. I am importing directly
(USB) from the camera and simply specify in the Preferences/Session Options
where I want the images to be placed on my hd and how they should be numbered.
It simply works! It also works if I import from the SD card with a
We used to do it that way but it turns out very hard to do reliably, and we
don't like it when DT destroy our user's images...
At this point we recommand using external tools to import images and then
use DT to import/process them
in particular, rapid photo downloader (http://www.damonlynch.net/r
Am 27.08.2014 um 15:57 schrieb Tony Arnold:
> Thanks. This is fine for folders on the local hard disk but not so good
> for removable media. I'd like to see DT treat removable media the same
> as a camera and, maybe optionally, copy the files to a local folder. Is
> there somewhere I can post this
Robert,
On 27/08/14 14:48, Robert William Hutton wrote:
> On 21/08/14 18:04, Tony Arnold wrote:
>> Is there a way to get DT to copy the images like it does when importing
>> from a camera? I couldn't see anything obvious. Or do I have to copy the
>> files locally and then import to DT?
>
> AFAIK
On 18/08/14 09:20, Pierre Feissel wrote:
> If I get it right, I guess the sensor ratio is not exactly 3:2. Actually, I
> have the same behaviour with my D700. For
> example, the JPEG from the camera viewed in gimp is 3184x2120 px and not
> 3180x2120. When you crop, the 3:2 ratio is
> stricly appl
On 21/08/14 18:04, Tony Arnold wrote:
> Is there a way to get DT to copy the images like it does when importing
> from a camera? I couldn't see anything obvious. Or do I have to copy the
> files locally and then import to DT?
AFAIK you have to copy them manually.
http://www.darktable.org/usermanu
On 18/08/14 22:16, Bernhard wrote:
> before switching to linux in order to use darktable I used Picture Window.
> I wonder if darktable also allows such color balancing technics as described
> here
> http://www.dl-c.com/Temp/downloads/Whitepapers/Color_Balance.pdf on pages 2
> ... 11. I always fo
On 26/08/14 18:36, Antti Holma wrote:
> Hi,
> I'll get myself this camera and downloaded two raw pictures from one of those
> reviews.
> Darktable doesn't seem to handle them, too bad.
> On my Windows machine Lightroom did this thow. Too bad I can't operate
> Lightroom at all.
>
> I could upload
No way? You can always export at the desired resolution then re-import and
sharpen :-)
That said this isn't entirely sensible. I didn't myself find much need for
output resolution sharpening unless upping resolution for large critical prints
and for that use case I found by far the best solut
Am 27.08.2014 um 10:03 schrieb Carlo Tariciotti:
> Thanks all for replies.
> Is more correct to apply the sharpening to the final resolution (for
> example, web or print use).
> My workflow for now is: export from Darktable at 1200x800 px, then i apply
> mogrify -sharpening 0x1 (imagemagick)
> It
Thanks all for replies.
Is more correct to apply the sharpening to the final resolution (for
example, web or print use).
My workflow for now is: export from Darktable at 1200x800 px, then i apply
mogrify -sharpening 0x1 (imagemagick)
It works well.
Regards
Carlo
2014-08-27 0:00 GMT+02:00 Stéph
11 matches
Mail list logo
