On 11/09/14 13:02, KOVÁCS István wrote:
> FYI, dcraw -e can also extract the full-resolution JPG preview. That is the
> image you see when you zoom in on an image
> in your camera.
This is the reason that the magiclantern RAW histogram overlay is so awesome:
it shows you the histogram of the RAW
FYI, dcraw -e can also extract the full-resolution JPG preview. That is the
image you see when you zoom in on an image in your camera.
--
Want excitement?
Manually upgrade your production database.
When you want reliability
On 2014-09-11 13:01, Robert William Hutton wrote:
> Look the same to me!
Yes, I agree. I didn't know about the full size preview, but this way
the behavior absolutely makes sense.
Thanks for the hints and help to all!
Moritz
--
On 11/09/14 11:41, Moritz Augsburger wrote:
> On 2014-09-11 11:54, Robert William Hutton wrote:
>> * spot white balance with the selection area on the dog (as it's black,
>> right?)
>>
>> As for what white balance is "correct" well, that's a matter of opinion,
>> unless you happened to shoot a gr
On Thu, 11 Sep 2014 12:41:26 +0200
Moritz Augsburger wrote:
> And, if geeqie would use the internal preview 1:1 zoom levels wouldn't
> be possible I guess. So it must be better at interpreting the WB in some
> way. Or are the .CR2 included previews the full image size?
geeqie uses JPEG preview f
On 2014-09-11 11:54, Robert William Hutton wrote:
> * spot white balance with the selection area on the dog (as it's black,
> right?)
>
> As for what white balance is "correct" well, that's a matter of opinion,
> unless you happened to shoot a grey card in
> that light. ;)
Yep, it's right, the
On 11/09/14 10:54, Robert William Hutton wrote:
> As for what white balance is "correct" well, that's a matter of opinion,
> unless you happened to shoot a grey card in
> that light. ;)
Incidentally, white balance is one of the things I spend a lot of time on when
processing RAWs. Getting it "r
On 11/09/14 08:13, Moritz Augsburger wrote:
> I have a strange effect with some of my images (luckily not all of
> them), they are unedited and using camera white balance, but in DT they
> look just ugly.
>
> Geeqie, Canon dppviewer and digikam work just fine with them.
There's something weird goi
Hi,
On 2014-09-11 11:02, KOVÁCS István wrote:
> In darktable you have base curve applied. Since the curve is applied
> separately to each of R, G and B, it causes not only lightness changes,
> but colour changes, too (a typical S curve will reduce any colour
> component that is already low, and in
In darktable you have base curve applied. Since the curve is applied
separately to each of R, G and B, it causes not only lightness changes, but
colour changes, too (a typical S curve will reduce any colour component
that is already low, and increase those already high, which changes
saturation and
Hi,
I have a strange effect with some of my images (luckily not all of
them), they are unedited and using camera white balance, but in DT they
look just ugly.
Geeqie, Canon dppviewer and digikam work just fine with them.
The original file is http://muschel.a-ix.net/~mo/private/dt/raw.CR2
Screen
11 matches
Mail list logo
