Hallöchen!
Tobias Ellinghaus writes:
> [...]
>
> - rating/rejecting an image does the same to all images in the
> group iff the group is collapsed.
>
> Would that be enough? I definitely don't want to remove or delete
> the linked images, and even color labels are probably not
> appropriate, not
On 17/04/15 21:51, Tobias Ellinghaus wrote:
>
> - rating/rejecting an image does the same to all images in the group iff the
> group is collapsed.
>
That would be great for my raw+jpg workflow; I could do the culling in
DT finally.
> Would that be enough? I definitely don't want to remove or de
Am Freitag, 17. April 2015, 20:08:27 schrieb Stefan Klinger:
> On 2015-Apr-17, Tobias Ellinghaus wrote with possible deletions:
> > We are reading, there is already
> > http://www.darktable.org/redmine/issues/8968 and I might rethink the
> > issue.
>
> Ah, sorry, did not find it beforehand. Seems
On 2015-Apr-17, Tobias Ellinghaus wrote with possible deletions:
> We are reading, there is already
> http://www.darktable.org/redmine/issues/8968 and I might rethink the
> issue.
Ah, sorry, did not find it beforehand. Seems to be discussed quite a
bit, with interesting aspects showing up. Shall
Am Freitag, 17. April 2015, 18:45:49 schrieb Stefan Klinger:
> Thanks for the many replies,
>
> I certainly wanted to avoid the raw vs. raw+jpeg discussion. IMHO,
> Darktable should provide efficient means to support both. My personal
> reason is that I'm not good enough a photo finisher to alwa
Thanks for the many replies,
I certainly wanted to avoid the raw vs. raw+jpeg discussion. IMHO,
Darktable should provide efficient means to support both. My personal
reason is that I'm not good enough a photo finisher to always produce
better results than the camera, let alone the effort/benefit
Hallöchen!
Pascal Obry writes:
> 2015-04-17 11:46 GMT+02:00 Torsten Bronger :
>
>> I shoot RAW+JPEG for being able to decide which I'd like too
>> keep.
>
> I understand that everyone can have its own workflow...
>
> But to me the answer to your question is the RAW.
Which question? How to deal
I used to initially also cull images in gthumb etc. before even loading them
into dt, just to avoid loading stuff into the database and then immediately
delete them.
But these days, now it is so easy to do within the light table, I've abandoned
this practice and just review and delete them wi
On 17/04/15 11:34, Torsten Bronger wrote:
> Fair enough, but the inconveniences that the OP and myself
> experience arise from the RAW+JPEG workflow.
>
Yes, and it could be solved with an option to apply ratings to all the
grouped images. I tried to create a LUA extension but failed.
I, myself,
On 17/04/15 11:34, Torsten Bronger wrote:
> Fair enough, but the inconveniences that the OP and myself
> experience arise from the RAW+JPEG workflow.
>
Yes, and it could be solved with an option to apply ratings to all the
grouped images. I tried to create a LUA extension but failed.
I, myself,
2015-04-17 11:46 GMT+02:00 Torsten Bronger :
> I shoot RAW+JPEG for being able to decide which I'd like too keep.
I understand that everyone can have its own workflow...
But to me the answer to your question is the RAW.
With the RAW you can always create an equivalent JPEG from the camera, it
ha
Hallöchen!
Michael Below writes:
> Maybe you should import only the RAW into darktable? There is an
> option for that in the importer.
I shoot RAW+JPEG for being able to decide which I'd like too keep.
Tschö,
Torsten.
--
Torsten BrongerJabber ID: torsten.bron...@jabber.rwth-aachen.de
--
"Michael Below" wrote:
> As I understand it, RAW+jpg is meant so that you have a jpg right away (for
> quick social media sharing or something like that) and a RAW to edit later,
> right?
Not necessarily: in my case, I use jpg+RAW, because I'm content with the ooc
jpg most of the time (say 95%),
Maybe you should import only the RAW into darktable? There is an option for
that in the importer.
As I understand it, RAW+jpg is meant so that you have a jpg right away (for
quick social media sharing or something like that) and a RAW to edit later,
right?
Cheers
Michael
-Ursprüngliche Nach
Hallöchen!
Rob Z. Smith writes:
> Raw only. I view raw+jpeg as counter productive.
Fair enough, but the inconveniences that the OP and myself
experience arise from the RAW+JPEG workflow.
Tschö,
Torsten.
--
Torsten BrongerJabber ID: torsten.bron...@jabber.rwth-aachen.de
2015-04-17 11:19 GMT+02:00 Rob Z. Smith :
> Raw only. I view raw+jpeg as counter productive.
I agree 100%
--
Pascal Obry / Magny Les Hameaux (78)
The best way to travel is by means of imagination
http://v2p.fr.eu.org
http://www.obry.net
gpg --keyserver keys.gnupg.net --recv-key F9
Raw only. I view raw+jpeg as counter productive.
-Original Message-
From: Torsten Bronger [mailto:bron...@physik.rwth-aachen.de]
Sent: 17 April 2015 10:13
To: darktable-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Darktable-users] Reject images workflow in lighttable
Hallöchen!
Rob Z. Smit
Hallöchen!
Rob Z. Smith writes:
> My simplistic approach, which works well for me, is to load the film roll into
> lighttable and then do a first pass rejecting anything plainly bad and not
> worth further inspection, then select and delete the rejects.
>
> After that I'll view in more detail the
My simplistic approach, which works well for me, is to load the film roll into
lighttable and then do a first pass rejecting anything plainly bad and not
worth further inspection, then select and delete the rejects.
After that I'll view in more detail the remaining images and rate them,
deleti
19 matches
Mail list logo
