On 10/17/2013 06:25 PM, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> * Max Killer [10-14-13 14:33]:
> [...]
>> out of curiosity I played with your sample and this might be a good starting
>> point if you want a solution for high and low res output.
>> please check the attached xmp file and load it for the image, b
As a starting point for all of my images I establish a 'typical' process
for the roll and then batch (style) convert my entire session.
This of course can never be totally satisfactory for all images on the
roll but it does give me something that is appreciably better than a
Canon jpg by compar
* Max Killer [10-14-13 14:33]:
[...]
> out of curiosity I played with your sample and this might be a good starting
> point if you want a solution for high and low res output.
> please check the attached xmp file and load it for the image, but _save_
> your original first!
>
> I used the profile
* Max Killer [10-14-13 14:33]:
[...]
> out of curiosity I played with your sample and this might be a good starting
> point if you want a solution for high and low res output.
> please check the attached xmp file and load it for the image, but _save_
> your original first!
I will make a copy of
On 10/10/2013 11:20 PM, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
* Max Killer [10-10-13 14:45]:
On 10/08/2013 05:16 PM, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
Presently running darktable-1.3_1107_g83b15db_git-2.1.TM.x86_64.
Adjusting denoise profiled strength, image displayed does not match
exported image. Exported image (
On 10/13/2013 08:06 PM, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> * Max Killer [10-13-13 13:37]:
>> On 10/13/2013 05:23 PM, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> [...]
>>> But what is the difference in the output image if export is not set to
>>> "high quality", particularly the printed output?
>>>
>>> tks much for explana
Am Sonntag, 13. Oktober 2013, 14:06:46 schrieb Patrick Shanahan:
[...]
> I guess this is the answer I need. I output to max size/resolution and do
> reductions for display automagically when adding to web albums. So, I
> should not select "do high q", iiuc.
If you output to max size (0x0 i
* Max Killer [10-13-13 13:37]:
> On 10/13/2013 05:23 PM, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
[...]
> > But what is the difference in the output image if export is not set to
> > "high quality", particularly the printed output?
> >
> > tks much for explanation.
>
> first, I don't understand your point with t
On 10/13/2013 05:23 PM, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> * Max Killer [10-13-13 03:58]:
>> On 10/10/2013 11:20 PM, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
>>> * Max Killer [10-10-13 14:45]:
On 10/08/2013 05:16 PM, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> Presently running darktable-1.3_1107_g83b15db_git-2.1.TM.x86_64.
>
* Max Killer [10-13-13 03:58]:
> On 10/10/2013 11:20 PM, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> > * Max Killer [10-10-13 14:45]:
> >> On 10/08/2013 05:16 PM, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> >>> Presently running darktable-1.3_1107_g83b15db_git-2.1.TM.x86_64.
> >>>
> >>> Adjusting denoise profiled strength, image di
On 10/10/2013 11:20 PM, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> * Max Killer [10-10-13 14:45]:
>> On 10/08/2013 05:16 PM, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
>>> Presently running darktable-1.3_1107_g83b15db_git-2.1.TM.x86_64.
>>>
>>> Adjusting denoise profiled strength, image displayed does not match
>>> exported image.
* Max Killer [10-10-13 14:45]:
> On 10/08/2013 05:16 PM, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> > Presently running darktable-1.3_1107_g83b15db_git-2.1.TM.x86_64.
> >
> > Adjusting denoise profiled strength, image displayed does not match
> > exported image. Exported image (jpg) shows much more noise at the s
On 10/08/2013 05:16 PM, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> Presently running darktable-1.3_1107_g83b15db_git-2.1.TM.x86_64.
>
> Adjusting denoise profiled strength, image displayed does not match
> exported image. Exported image (jpg) shows much more noise at the same
> display size. Makes it very difficu
Hi,
Personaly i saw the opposite effect :
I see some artefact on the dartable view but it's ok when it's exported
More information can be found on the darktable googleplus community :
https://plus.google.com/113053655119753635181/posts/iHyTQnSEdgy
Regards
Le mardi 08 octobre 2013 à 11:16 -040
I've experienced the same on some stable builds, too.
/Paul
On 08.10.2013 17:58, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> * Federico Bruni [10-08-13 11:54]:
>> 2013/10/8 Patrick Shanahan
>>
>>> Adjusting denoise profiled strength, image displayed does not match
>>> exported image. Exported image (jpg) shows
* Federico Bruni [10-08-13 11:54]:
> 2013/10/8 Patrick Shanahan
>
> > Adjusting denoise profiled strength, image displayed does not match
> > exported image. Exported image (jpg) shows much more noise at the same
> > display size. Makes it very difficult and time consuming to adjust noise
> >
2013/10/8 Patrick Shanahan
> Adjusting denoise profiled strength, image displayed does not match
> exported image. Exported image (jpg) shows much more noise at the same
> display size. Makes it very difficult and time consuming to adjust noise
> strength level to match desired viewing size for
Presently running darktable-1.3_1107_g83b15db_git-2.1.TM.x86_64.
Adjusting denoise profiled strength, image displayed does not match
exported image. Exported image (jpg) shows much more noise at the same
display size. Makes it very difficult and time consuming to adjust noise
strength level to
18 matches
Mail list logo
