(again, I was wrong about exposure, this applies only to WB)
it's more about what WB fundamentally is than how we implement it, but yes
there are technicall reasons why you can't do that
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 7:53 PM, Richard Levitte wrote:
> So what you're saying is that there are technical
So what you're saying is that there are technical reasons, and they
are about how dt, or at least those modules are constructed.
In message
on Thu, 1 Aug 2013 10:56:22 +0200, jeremy rosen
said:
jeremy.rosen> to put it simply, you cannot not have some sort of exposure/white
balance on parts o
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 11:33 AM, jeremy rosen wrote:
>
> So you say we can have a mask between two values right? When you open an
>> image in the darkroom module it has a default WB value and EV (i'm guessing
>> 0EV). If you enable a mask and change the EV or WB value we could apply the
>> mask b
> So you say we can have a mask between two values right? When you open an
> image in the darkroom module it has a default WB value and EV (i'm guessing
> 0EV). If you enable a mask and change the EV or WB value we could apply the
> mask between the new value and the base value. Am i wrong on this?
Johannes,
I have created a pull-request for this feature. Ok to merge?
I've done some testing and it seems to work just fine...
--
Pascal Obry / Magny Les Hameaux (78)
The best way to travel is by means of imagination
http://v2p.fr.eu.org
http://www.obry.net
gpg --keyserver keys.g
2013/8/1 johannes hanika :
> i don't see a technical reason for exposure, but wb works on the bayer
> pattern before demosaicing which makes blending difficult. you can do color
> correction though.
I think we already had this discussion about exposure and masks, so
what about activating this then
i don't see a technical reason for exposure, but wb works on the bayer
pattern before demosaicing which makes blending difficult. you can do color
correction though.
j.
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 10:56 AM, jeremy rosen wrote:
> to put it simply, you cannot not have some sort of exposure/white bala
Hi Jeremy, thanks for your reply.
So you say we can have a mask between two values right? When you open an
image in the darkroom module it has a default WB value and EV (i'm guessing
0EV). If you enable a mask and change the EV or WB value we could apply the
mask between the new value and the base
to put it simply, you cannot not have some sort of exposure/white balance
on parts of images.
you could have a gradiant/mask between two values, but you can not have no
EV compensation or WB at all.
arguably it would be interesting to have a way to do that, in particular
for WB where different zo
Hi.
I posted this question (twice) on DT's Google+ comunity (
http://goo.gl/CBvw7y) but got no answer, so i'm trying this mailing list :)
Why aren't masks/conditional blending available in white balance and
exposure modules? Is it a technical reason or an implementation decision?
It would be nice
10 matches
Mail list logo
