Am 24.04.2012 15:53, schrieb Wayne Beaton:
Question is posted.
Thanks a lot. Is there a way I can follow the discussion? The search
doesn't show up anything :-/
IP questions are kept private.
Wayne
On 04/25/2012 02:42 PM, Aaron Digulla wrote:
Am 24.04.2012 15:53, schrieb Wayne Beaton:
Question is posted.
Thanks a lot. Is there a way I can follow the discussion? The search
doesn't show up anything :-/
Why?
On 04/25/2012 03:20 PM, Wayne Beaton wrote:
IP questions are kept private.
Wayne
On 04/25/2012 02:42 PM, Aaron Digulla wrote:
Am 24.04.2012 15:53, schrieb Wayne Beaton:
Question is posted.
Thanks a lot. Is there a way I can follow the discussion? The search
doesn't show up anything
Am 25.04.2012 21:45, schrieb Denis Roy:
Sure, for CQs, but this is discussion involving licensing and copyright
initiated by a member of our community (and a committer, no less). I
don't understand why such discussion would need to happen behind closed
doors, especially considering we
I'm guessing it's just an accident of how the IP system was setup, e.g. no set
of permissions set up for IP questions vs. actual CQs.
On 2012-04-25, at 12:58 PM, Aaron Digulla wrote:
Am 25.04.2012 21:45, schrieb Denis Roy:
Sure, for CQs, but this is discussion involving licensing and
Could be -- but I implemented that functionality, and I don't remember
that to be part of the design. I'll look into it.
On 04/25/2012 04:00 PM, Miles Parker wrote:
I'm guessing it's just an accident of how the IP system was setup, e.g. no
set of permissions set up for IP questions vs.
Zitat von Wayne Beaton wa...@eclipse.org:
Right. That functionality is limited to Project Leads and PMC members.
Sorry about that.
What have we learned yesterday? open source isn't that open after all ;-)
I guess that I'll have to pose the question.
Thanks.
Can you give me some words to
On 04/24/2012 05:43 AM, Aaron Digulla wrote:
Zitat von Wayne Beaton wa...@eclipse.org:
Right. That functionality is limited to Project Leads and PMC members.
Sorry about that.
What have we learned yesterday? open source isn't that open after
all ;-)
Sorry... hot button item.
What is your
Question is posted.
Wayne
On 04/24/2012 05:43 AM, Aaron Digulla wrote:
Zitat von Wayne Beaton wa...@eclipse.org:
Right. That functionality is limited to Project Leads and PMC members.
Sorry about that.
What have we learned yesterday? open source isn't that open after
all ;-)
I guess
On 2012-04-24, at 9:21 AM, Aaron Digulla wrote:
Zitat von Wayne Beaton wa...@eclipse.org:
How is this not open?
As I said yesterday: It's not open because I can't simply copy code from
GPL'd projects or other OSS sources without causing a lot of trouble :-)
OK, I'll be the first to
OK, I'll be the first to point out that you can't *ever* copy code
from GPL'd projects, and that GPL isn't OSS. ;)
Hahahahahaha.
Andrew
___
dash-dev mailing list
dash-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dash-dev
I'm just happy to see all this open communication on the Dash dev list.
Wayne
On 04/24/2012 01:23 PM, Andrew Overholt wrote:
OK, I'll be the first to point out that you can't *ever* copy code
from GPL'd projects, and that GPL isn't OSS. ;)
Hahahahahaha.
Andrew
Hello,
I've stumbled over one of these corner cases: I copied 7 lines of code
from stackoverflow.com (http://stackoverflow.com/a/3758880/34088)
The code isn't an OSS project, it's not under a specific license and I
feel that it's not worth the effort to run this through the standard IP
process.
The copied code is intellectual property and as such is subject to the
Eclipse IP Due Diligence process.
It can only be distributed from eclipse.org (e.g. a source code
repository) if we have clear license from the author to do so.
Yes, it's a small bit of code, but the full IP process still
Am 23.04.2012 19:24, schrieb Wayne Beaton:
Alternatively, I think we can make the case that Stack Overflow
contributions are CC-licensed [1] and treat the code similar to a
third-party library. However, I believe that license compatibility will
be complicated.
Here is some material to
Sounds like a plan.
Wayne
On 04/23/2012 01:47 PM, Aaron Digulla wrote:
How about I open an IP request so the lawyers can give a nod to the
rule? This would create a simple, safe solution for all Eclipse
developers because I bet that I wasn't the first one to wonder - I was
just the first
Am 23.04.2012 20:08, schrieb Miles Parker:
That's kind of perverse, given that one
of the major points of Open Source is to be able to share code with
one another...
rant
OSS is not about sharing code with just anyone; it's only with anyone
you happen to like!
The main difference to
Am 23.04.2012 19:59, schrieb Wayne Beaton:
Sounds like a plan.
Since this is my first attempt to do this: That means I should open a CQ
request on ipzilla, right?
What project should I select? eclipse.platform?
How about I open an IP request so the lawyers can give a nod to the
rule? This
Good question.
Go to the portal, select any project (it doesn't matter) in the Eclipse
Projects component. Click on the [pose] a question about general legal
issue option. That'll take you to the right place.
(or just go here:
Am 23.04.2012 21:01, schrieb Wayne Beaton:
Good question.
Go to the portal, select any project (it doesn't matter) in the Eclipse
Projects component. Click on the [pose] a question about general legal
issue option. That'll take you to the right place.
(or just go here:
Right. That functionality is limited to Project Leads and PMC members.
Sorry about that.
I guess that I'll have to pose the question. Can you give me some words
to start from?
Thanks,
Wayne
On 04/23/2012 04:01 PM, Aaron Digulla wrote:
Am 23.04.2012 21:01, schrieb Wayne Beaton:
Good
21 matches
Mail list logo
