Dnia 01-06-2005, ro o godzinie 00:56 -0700, Alex Graveley napisa(a):
Seems like the bookmark backend should look for an existing web history
hit for the URL and alter that with some bookmark attributes (anything
other than bookmark name?). It should create an empty hit with no
content if
On Tue, 2005-05-31 at 00:05 +0200, Martijn van Beers wrote:
If the actual link is an attribute it shouldn't be too hard for Hits to
recognize that hits from bookmarks and from web history are identical,
and only show one of them.
Maybe Hits should be a little smarter and be able to
On Sun, 2005-05-29 at 14:26 +0200, MDK wrote:
3) Do we need bookmark indexing? :) Seems cool to me.
Seems very useful to me!
Regarding Best, maybe there should be some way of grouping
bookmark-results with results from the web history of the bookmarked
pages?
Some kind of grouping could be
On Sun, 2005-05-29 at 14:26 +0200, MDK wrote:
Hi,
I stared implementing WebBookmarksQueryable thing - a www bookmark
indexer (Epiphany, Mozilla, Firefox).
I'm through with the indexing part, but I've got some questions:
1) What Uri scheme would be the best for bookmarks? Currently I'm
On Sun, 2005-05-29 at 08:28 -0600, Chris Lahey wrote:
Why not just have the uri be http://www.google.com ? Why do you need
a separate uri scheme?
Uris should be unique identifiers for hits. If the bookmark uri was
http://www.google.com, it would conflict with the a web history item for
On Sun, 2005-05-29 at 17:08 +0200, Jon Trowbridge wrote:
On Sun, 2005-05-29 at 08:28 -0600, Chris Lahey wrote:
Why not just have the uri be http://www.google.com ? Why do you need
a separate uri scheme?
Uris should be unique identifiers for hits. If the bookmark uri was
On Sun, 2005-05-29 at 17:08 +0200, Jon Trowbridge wrote:
On Sun, 2005-05-29 at 08:28 -0600, Chris Lahey wrote:
Why not just have the uri be http://www.google.com ? Why do you need
a separate uri scheme?
Uris should be unique identifiers for hits. If the bookmark uri was
On Sun, 2005-05-29 at 22:29 +0200, Martijn van Beers wrote:
Why does that matter? It isn't really all that interesting whether
a url was found in your history or in your bookmarks, is it? you'd just
want one search result, right?
Having the Uris be unique identifiers for the hits is a very
