Re: Re: [rfc] HiRes

2003-08-11 Thread Dave Rolsky
On Sat, 9 Aug 2003, Joshua Hoblitt wrote: On the one hand, I agree. HiRes is bad, and hires is a bit worse. OTOH, _so_ many people are already familiar with Time::HiRes, that having our own variation on it may be confusing to as many people, or more, as hires is. So are we back to

Re: DT::TZ test failure

2003-08-11 Thread Dave Rolsky
On Sat, 9 Aug 2003, Joshua Hoblitt wrote: I'm getting this failure from the CPAN dist and when I parse the Olson files myself. Since 0.25 installed for me without errors at some point in the past I'm assuming that this failure is being caused by a recent release of DT. Can anyone reproduce

Re: DateTime-localtime() (was Re: DT::TZ test failure)

2003-08-11 Thread John Siracusa
On Sunday, August 10, 2003, at 10:24 PM, David Wheeler wrote: On Sunday, August 10, 2003, at 07:17 PM, John Siracusa wrote: Obviously, you need currying. See Perl 6. Or create your own subclass with its own now() method that passes the argument for you. Or create a function that calls it for

Re: RFC: DateTime::TimeZone::LMT

2003-08-11 Thread Rick Measham
On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 08:02:02AM +1000, Rick Measham wrote: What do people think? I can provide patches for this if I'm not the only one who'd find it useful. Ben replied: No, I would like this too. Perhaps the functionality can be rolled into DT::Alias somehow. They seem related... Nah, it