Re: [Kinda OT] Could somebody double check this?

2003-10-17 Thread Joshua Hoblitt
How about to refactor DateTime RD code into another module? There is already enough use for rd, minutes and seconds in other calendars to justify having a base module. I think we've been over this before haven't we? I thought the consensus was that a base class would be a good idea but that

RE: [Kinda OT] Could somebody double check this?

2003-10-13 Thread Hill, Ronald
Hi Maki, Hi, dt-ers. I've been lurking on this list for some time now, and so far I understand that while a few people have attempted, nobody has come up with a lunar, solar, or lunisolar calenders (at least I don't remember seeing it on this list). This is correct, there was talk of

RE: [Kinda OT] Could somebody double check this?

2003-10-13 Thread Hill, Ronald
Hi Maki, [snipped] [Ronald Hill Wrote] This is correct, there was talk of doing this however, it is not easy. The last I heard, there was work on getting the SLA library released under the LGPL. (hopefully this will include a windows port of the library) This library has all of

[Kinda OT] Could somebody double check this?

2003-10-11 Thread Daisuke Maki
Hi, dt-ers. I've been lurking on this list for some time now, and so far I understand that while a few people have attempted, nobody has come up with a lunar, solar, or lunisolar calenders (at least I don't remember seeing it on this list). And so I was just fooling around with some code to see