Re: Date::ICal's pseudo-mjd versus real MJD - Rich?

2003-01-12 Thread Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes
On Sat, 11 Jan 2003 16:44:37 -0500 (EST), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, 11 Jan 2003, Dave Rolsky wrote: You know, on reflection, I don't think the internals matter _at all_ (well, they need to work, but you already took care of that ;) What matters is that we can return a _standard_ value

Re: Date::ICal's pseudo-mjd versus real MJD - Rich?

2003-01-12 Thread Dave Rolsky
On Sun, 12 Jan 2003, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote: Date::ICal uses what Calendrical Calculations uses (that they call Rata Die, fixed date). They are days on or after Jan 1 of year 1 (Gregorian). This different from MJD. I'd like to see Date::ICal switch to using rd to describe them

Re: Date::ICal's pseudo-mjd versus real MJD - Rich?

2003-01-11 Thread Rich Bowen
On Sat, 11 Jan 2003, Dave Rolsky wrote: No, this has nothing to do with Mr. Dominus. Rich, can you explain the pseudo-mjd system that Date::ICal uses for its internals? And why didn't you you use real MJD? It is MJD + an offset (or - an offset, as the case may be). It makes the calculations

Re: Date::ICal's pseudo-mjd versus real MJD - Rich?

2003-01-11 Thread Rich Bowen
On Sat, 11 Jan 2003, Dave Rolsky wrote: You know, on reflection, I don't think the internals matter _at all_ (well, they need to work, but you already took care of that ;) What matters is that we can return a _standard_ value for the use of other calendar implementers. Yes, that is the