RE: DateTime 0.12CVS - Success from Cygwin, still failing under V C++

2003-06-05 Thread Hill, Ronald
Hi John, [snipped] > Specifically, the first failure is this block: > > > { > > my $dt = DateTime->from_epoch( epoch => -2082844800 ); > #fails here > > is( $dt->year, 1904, 'year should be 1904' ); > > is( $dt->month, 1, 'month should be 1904' ); > > is( $dt->day, 1, 'day

Re: DateTime 0.12CVS - Success from Cygwin, still failing under V C++

2003-06-05 Thread John Peacock
Hill, Ronald wrote: fails horrably on windows :( I posted this on CLPM maybe someone has something on this. It's even documented that way now in bleadperl: http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/perl5-porters/2003-05/msg00495.html :~( John -- John Peacock Director of Information Research and

RE: DateTime 0.12CVS - Success from Cygwin, still failing under V C++

2003-06-05 Thread Hill, Ronald
Hi John, > > > And to follow up on that, it appears that POSIX used the C > definition for > gmtime() and it does not *explicitely* require support for > negative time_t > values. It appears that DEC implementated negative time_t > support and other > vendors added it as well (AIX 3.2.5

RE: DateTime 0.12CVS - Success from Cygwin, still failing under V C++

2003-06-05 Thread Hill, Ronald
> > > On Wed, 4 Jun 2003, John Peacock wrote: > > > The t/13strftime.t file has DOS line endings, which causes > all tests to fail > > under Cygwin. If that is corrected, then Cygwin tests > completely clean. > > Really? I can't see them. I think I know what went wrong. I updated my module