Re: RFC DateTime::Calendar::French_Rev

2003-04-02 Thread Eugene van der Pijll
Dave Rolsky schreef: > On Wed, 2 Apr 2003, Jean Forget wrote: > > For the moment, there are two sets of accessors: > > - hour, min, second, etc for sexagesimal time > > - dhour, dmin and dsecond for decimal time IMHO, this is the way to go. > > but strftime knows only decimal time. I think it sh

Re: RFC DateTime::Calendar::French_Rev

2003-04-01 Thread Daisuke Maki
There is absolutely no reason you should feel compelled to offer the full DateTime.pm interface. Offer what makes sense for _your_ calendar. The Julian calendar is actually a really _bad_ example for other calendar module authors, because it's API is almost identical to the Gregorian calendar (Da

Re: RFC DateTime::Calendar::French_Rev

2003-04-01 Thread Dave Rolsky
On Wed, 2 Apr 2003, Jean Forget wrote: > As I told long ago (January 2003), the French Revolutionary > calendar included a reform to decimalize time counting, > with 10 hours per day, 100 minutes per hour and 100 seconds per > minute. But this reform was never put into effect. So, > my module shou

RFC DateTime::Calendar::French_Rev

2003-04-01 Thread Jean Forget
I have begun to work on DateTime::Calendar::French_Rev, the heir of my previous Date::Convert::French_Rev module. As I told long ago (January 2003), the French Revolutionary calendar included a reform to decimalize time counting, with 10 hours per day, 100 minutes per hour and 100 seconds per min