So the general scheme is SOURCE-NAME-FUNCTION, i.e. RIPE-NCC-MNT ?
Von: db-wg Im Auftrag von William Sylvester via db-wg
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 30. September 2020 21:44
An: db-wg@ripe.net
Betreff: [db-wg] MNTNER Naming : Consensus
db-wg members,
The chairs of the database working group believe the
In message <1533946782.566189.1601485891...@mail.yahoo.com>,
"ripede...@yahoo.co.uk" wrote:
>The RIPE NCC mirrors the other 4 RIR databases and the mirrored data is upd=
>ated daily. If you add '--resource' to your query of the RIPE Database you =
>will get the correct response from the RIR data
In message <2054871960.332293.1601468662...@mail.yahoo.com>,
"ripede...@yahoo.co.uk" wrote:
>This is another action point that has been open for 4 years. We either need=
> to progress it or cancel it.https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/db-wg/=
>2016-May/005240.html
>It is basically asking fo
FYI, when APNIC implemented "WHOWAS" we deliberately walk over
deletions to carry history backward to prior state.
Whowas is implemented in RDAP, its meta state over RDAP representation
of the information but the underlying information comes from Whois
updates.
We also have a view inside APNIC th
Hi,
On 30/09/2020 23:07, Job Snijders via db-wg wrote:
> There is nothing left for RIPE to further improve here. RIPE-NONAUTH is
> slowly and steadily decreasing in size. AFRINIC resource holders have
> all the tools available to publish their routing intentions in either
> the AFRINIC IRR or und
Dear Nick,
On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 09:15:11PM +0100, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> Job Snijders via db-wg wrote on 30/09/2020 21:07:
> > I agree. The combination of NWI-5 and RIPE-731 obsoleted NWI-3.
> >
> > There is nothing left for RIPE to further improve here. RIPE-NONAUTH is
> > slowly and steadil
Job Snijders via db-wg wrote on 30/09/2020 21:07:
I agree. The combination of NWI-5 and RIPE-731 obsoleted NWI-3.
There is nothing left for RIPE to further improve here. RIPE-NONAUTH is
slowly and steadily decreasing in size. AFRINIC resource holders have
all the tools available to publish thei
Dear colleagues,
I agree. The combination of NWI-5 and RIPE-731 obsoleted NWI-3.
There is nothing left for RIPE to further improve here. RIPE-NONAUTH is
slowly and steadily decreasing in size. AFRINIC resource holders have
all the tools available to publish their routing intentions in either
the
db-wg members,
The chairs of the database working group believe there is a consensus to have a
standardised name format for creating new MNTNER objects. There was talk of a
prefix (MNT-) or a suffix (-MNT). When creating a new standard it doesn't
really make sense to introduce a standard with m
Hi Denis and DB-WG,
I very much agree, NWI-5 supersedes NWI-3 and NWI-3 should be considered
complete now (in my opinion).
- Cynthia
On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 4:32 PM ripedenis--- via db-wg
wrote:
> Dear Colleagues
>
> This is another 4 year old task about 'encouraging' the transfer of
> ROUTE(
...with the cut/paste formatting fix...
On Wednesday, 30 September 2020, 19:11:56 CEST, ripedenis--- via db-wg
wrote:
Hi Ronald
The RIPE NCC mirrors the other 4 RIR databases and the mirrored data is updated
daily. If you add '--resource' to your query of the RIPE Database you will ge
Hi Ronald
The RIPE NCC mirrors the other 4 RIR databases and the mirrored data is updated
daily. If you add '--resource' to your query of the RIPE Database you will get
the correct response from the RIR database (mirror) that holds the resource.
for example:whois -h whois.ripe.net -r --resource
Dear Colleagues
This is another 4 year old task about 'encouraging' the transfer of ROUTE(6)
objects for Afrinic resources from the RIPE Database to the Afrinic
Database.https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/db-wg/2016-May/005241.html
Is this still an ongoing task? Is there anything more that
Dear Colleagues
This is another action point that has been open for 4 years. We either need to
progress it or cancel
it.https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/db-wg/2016-May/005240.html
It is basically asking for full history of existing and deleted resource
objects. In the link above on this N
I have been writing a modest little software tool recently that seeks to
ferret out the identity of the "top level" registrant organization for
any given assigned IPv4 address. In this context by "top level" I mean
the entity that obtained the relevant IP address assignment directly,
either from o
15 matches
Mail list logo
