Hi,
On Sun, Nov 08, 2020 at 11:30:03PM +0100, denis walker via db-wg wrote:
> As Job said it is at an early discussion stage. If we do this using
> the NWI mechanism then the Problem statement and then a Solution
> definition will be discussed on the mailing list by anyone with an
> interest in th
Hello,
To option B I'm interested to join as well.
Kind Regards,
Elad
From: db-wg on behalf of Cynthia Revström via db-wg
Sent: Monday, November 9, 2020 12:52 AM
To: denis walker
Cc: Database WG
Subject: Re: [db-wg] Interest to continue NWI-9
Hi Denis
Hi Denis,
If we end up with option B, consider me interested in joining :)
-Cynthia
On Sun, Nov 8, 2020, 23:30 denis walker via db-wg wrote:
> Hi All
>
> As Job said it is at an early discussion stage. If we do this using
> the NWI mechanism then the Problem statement and then a Solution
> def
Hi All
As Job said it is at an early discussion stage. If we do this using
the NWI mechanism then the Problem statement and then a Solution
definition will be discussed on the mailing list by anyone with an
interest in this issue. Someone has to put forward a first draft for
discussion.
Once thes
Hi Cynthia,
The NRTM v4 initiative is in an awkward early stage where various
parties (with *no* obligations towards each other!) are attempting to
set the stage for the future existence of an inter-operable successor to
the NRTM v3 protocol.
As indicated before, the nature of this call was info
I would like to see more here on the mailing list, so I would request that
any future calls be recorded and published.
I have opinions on this subject and I don't think me missing the call
should leave me out of the loop.
- Cynthia
On Fri, Nov 6, 2020, 11:31 Stavros Konstantaras <
stavros.konsta
Hi Cynthia,
Yes the call happened and the problem description is almost ready. Soon will be
published here in the mailing list so the DB-WG chairs can officially create a
new NWI and submit it to RIPE NCC developers
Thank you for your support and your interest on that :)
Best regards,
Stavr
I also support creating a new NWI for a modernized NRTM like service.
- Cynthia
On Fri, 6 Nov 2020, 02:50 Cynthia Revström, wrote:
> Hi Job,
>
> Was there a call about this yet?
>
> And if so, was there any outcome?
>
> - Cynthia
>
> On Thu, 29 Oct 2020, 20:38 Job Snijders via db-wg, wrote:
>
Hi Job,
Was there a call about this yet?
And if so, was there any outcome?
- Cynthia
On Thu, 29 Oct 2020, 20:38 Job Snijders via db-wg, wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 06:30:28PM +0100, denis walker wrote:
> > I would suggest we create NWI-12 to move forward with a new version of
> > NRTM. P
Hello Denis,
A new NWI sounds reasonable.
Working towards a solution that can then be implemented fairly quickly in
IRRd and the RIPE database is great, because it’ll allow us to reach fairly
wide adoption on a relatively short timescale.
I can’t make the proposed call, but I’ll wait to see what
Hi Dennis,
I agree to close NWI-9 and proceed with opening of NWI-12 in order to explore
ways
to modernise the NRTM service. With that said, please consider my interest also
for
NWI-12.
Best regards,
Stavros Konstantaras | Sr. Network Engineer | AMS-IX
M +31 (0) 620 89 51 04 | T +31 20 305
Hi Job
I am certainly available for that. Would you be available then Ed to
offer any input from the RIPE NCC?
cheers
denis
co-chair DB-WG
On Thu, 29 Oct 2020 at 20:38, Job Snijders wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 06:30:28PM +0100, denis walker wrote:
> > I would suggest we create NWI-12 to
On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 06:30:28PM +0100, denis walker wrote:
> I would suggest we create NWI-12 to move forward with a new version of
> NRTM. Perhaps you could write the first draft of the problem
> statement?
Given that more people than just myself were engaged with this subject
so far... maybe
Hi Job
I would agree that NWI-9 is finished, according to the way it is
worded. I would suggest we create NWI-12 to move forward with a new
version of NRTM. Perhaps you could write the first draft of the
problem statement?
cheers
denis
co-chair DB-WG
On Thu, 29 Oct 2020 at 18:09, Job Snijders w
Dear group,
I think NWI-9 needs to be reworded, it in part has been over taken by
current events. Rereading
https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/db-wg/2019-April/006236.html
what is described there actually already has completed.
RIPE NCC's NRTM servers are open to the public (this was not th
Hi Stavros
Thanks for the comment. I have let Ed know about your interest.
cheers
denis
co-chair DB-WG
On Thu, 29 Oct 2020 at 17:11, Stavros Konstantaras via db-wg
wrote:
>
> Hi WG chairs,
>
>
> I would like to declare that from our side we are still interested to team up
> with Ed and RIPE NC
Hi WG chairs,
I would like to declare that from our side we are still interested to team up
with Ed and RIPE NCC colleagues to continue the work on NWI-9 item
in order to modernise the NRTM service with something better and more suitable
for our current needs.
As far as I can recall, Ed and h
17 matches
Mail list logo
