Dear Colleagues
This is another action point that has been open for 4 years. We either need to
progress it or cancel
it.https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/db-wg/2016-May/005240.html
It is basically asking for full history of existing and deleted resource
objects. In the link above on this N
FYI, when APNIC implemented "WHOWAS" we deliberately walk over
deletions to carry history backward to prior state.
Whowas is implemented in RDAP, its meta state over RDAP representation
of the information but the underlying information comes from Whois
updates.
We also have a view inside APNIC th
In message <2054871960.332293.1601468662...@mail.yahoo.com>,
"ripede...@yahoo.co.uk" wrote:
>This is another action point that has been open for 4 years. We either need=
> to progress it or cancel it.https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/db-wg/=
>2016-May/005240.html
>It is basically asking fo
Hi Ronald
You are mistaken :) The query string can be a single IP address or CIDR or a
range. And the range doesn't even need to be an exact matching range. So if you
search for:
x.y.0.0 - x.y.0.100
and the actual object in the database is:
x.y.0.0 - x.y.0.255
it will still return this database
Hi,
I would like to support this initiative and request that it gets
implemented.
Recently we developed a platform for IP Transfers where we provide a lot
of data to our customers to help them do their due diligence before
deciding to make a transfer of IP addresses. We collect ripe historic
