Stas Bekman wrote:
I didn't have a chance to dig into this, but Rafael is planning 5.9.1
release soonish, and DBI 1.41 fails one of the tests with blead:
t/41prof_dump..NOK 6# Test 6 got: '1.0.0' (t/41prof_dump.t at
line 55)
# Expected: '1.0'
# t/41prof_dump.t line 55 is: ok($1, $DBI:
I didn't have a chance to dig into this, but Rafael is planning 5.9.1 release
soonish, and DBI 1.41 fails one of the tests with blead:
t/41prof_dump..NOK 6# Test 6 got: '1.0.0' (t/41prof_dump.t at line 55)
# Expected: '1.0'
# t/41prof_dump.t line 55 is: ok($1, $DBI::ProfileDumper::VERS
On Monday 08 March 2004 11:15 am, Jeff Urlwin wrote:
> > On Monday 08 March 2004 12:41 am, Tim Bunce wrote:
> > > On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 08:25:17PM -1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > > The followint patch implements PERL_NO_GET_CONTEXT for DBI (cvs
> > > > version #200).
> > >
> > > Beau, am I
>
> On Monday 08 March 2004 12:41 am, Tim Bunce wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 08:25:17PM -1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > The followint patch implements PERL_NO_GET_CONTEXT for DBI (cvs
> > > version #200).
> >
> > Beau, am I right in thinking that if the DBI was built with
> > PERL_NO
On Monday 08 March 2004 12:41 am, Tim Bunce wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 08:25:17PM -1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > The followint patch implements PERL_NO_GET_CONTEXT for DBI
> > (cvs version #200).
>
> Beau, am I right in thinking that if the DBI was built with
> PERL_NO_GET_CONTEXT then d
On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 08:25:17PM -1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The followint patch implements PERL_NO_GET_CONTEXT for DBI
> (cvs version #200).
Beau, am I right in thinking that if the DBI was built with
PERL_NO_GET_CONTEXT then drivers would have to be built with
PERL_NO_GET_CONTEXT *only i
Thanks Tim and guys -
Everything works perfectly.
Aloha => Beau;
