Hi Paul!
Very good to hear from you! Wow, another book - that takes a LOT of one's life
as I know. I look forward to reading another of your works.
Regards,
Patrick
On Apr 18, 2013, at 3:09 PM, Paul DuBois wrote:
>
> On Apr 18, 2013, at 12:07 PM, Patrick Galbraith wrote:
>
>> Lyle,
>>
>>
On 18/04/2013 20:09, Paul DuBois wrote:
On Apr 18, 2013, at 12:07 PM, Patrick Galbraith wrote:
Lyle,
To be certain, they don't wish to "kill" DBD::mysql. They are really trying to
define what Oracle supports and what they do not. The were very helpful in painstakingly
migrating the bugs from
On Apr 18, 2013, at 12:07 PM, Patrick Galbraith wrote:
> Lyle,
>
> To be certain, they don't wish to "kill" DBD::mysql. They are really trying
> to define what Oracle supports and what they do not. The were very helpful in
> painstakingly migrating the bugs from their system manually to RT. Al
Lyle,
To be certain, they don't wish to "kill" DBD::mysql. They are really trying to
define what Oracle supports and what they do not. The were very helpful in
painstakingly migrating the bugs from their system manually to RT. Albeit, I
have my work cut out for me now :)
Regards,
Patrick
On
Hi Lyle,
I just released 4.0.23 Which updated the documentation to reflect that
MySQL/Oracle will no longer be where bugs are reported and to use
http://rt.cpan.org
Here is my LJ post about this matter:
http://capttofu.livejournal.com/29756.html
Regards,
Patrick
On Apr 11, 2013, at 7:37 PM,
On 12/04/2013 00:58, Darren Duncan wrote:
On 2013.04.11 4:37 PM, Lyle wrote:
Hmm... Got a reply to my bug report and it's a bit worrying:
http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=68266
Seems like MySQL don't want to directly support DBD::mysql any more.
Whether you
like mysql or not, that's a heavily
On 2013.04.11 4:37 PM, Lyle wrote:
Hmm... Got a reply to my bug report and it's a bit worrying:
http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=68266
Seems like MySQL don't want to directly support DBD::mysql any more. Whether you
like mysql or not, that's a heavily used DBD.
I'm not aware that DBD::mysql wa
Hmm... Got a reply to my bug report and it's a bit worrying:
http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=68266
Seems like MySQL don't want to directly support DBD::mysql any more.
Whether you like mysql or not, that's a heavily used DBD.
Lyle
