On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 03:26:32PM -, Avis, Ed wrote:
> [diff to DBI.pm]
>
> >+ ($tuple_status) ? @$tuple_status = () : $tuple_status = [];
>
> AFAIK this code is equivalent to
>
> @$tuple_status = ();
>
> because of autovivification.
True. I prefer to make it explicit. I guess a
[diff to DBI.pm]
>+ ($tuple_status) ? @$tuple_status = () : $tuple_status = [];
AFAIK this code is equivalent to
@$tuple_status = ();
because of autovivification. But anyway, it works.
--
Ed Avis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 02:21:33PM -, Avis, Ed wrote:
> Tim Bunce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >Actualy I did this instead, as it seems more correct:
> >
> >@@ -1720,5 +1721,6 @@
> > sub execute_for_fetch {
> >my ($sth, $fetch_tuple_sub, $tuple_status) = @_;
> >- @$tuple_st
Tim Bunce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Actualy I did this instead, as it seems more correct:
>
>@@ -1720,5 +1721,6 @@
> sub execute_for_fetch {
>my ($sth, $fetch_tuple_sub, $tuple_status) = @_;
>- @$tuple_status = () if $tuple_status; # reset the status array
>+ # start with
On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 01:18:19PM +, Tim Bunce wrote:
> Thanks, applied.
>
> Tim.
>
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 10:18:03AM -, Avis, Ed wrote:
> > This patch to DBI-1.40 fixes an error
> >
> > Can't use an undefined value as an ARRAY reference at DBI.pm line 1735
> >
> > when using execut
Thanks, applied.
Tim.
On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 10:18:03AM -, Avis, Ed wrote:
> This patch to DBI-1.40 fixes an error
>
> Can't use an undefined value as an ARRAY reference at DBI.pm line 1735
>
> when using execute_array() with zero values for a bind parameter. It
> includes some new test c
This patch to DBI-1.40 fixes an error
Can't use an undefined value as an ARRAY reference at DBI.pm line 1735
when using execute_array() with zero values for a bind parameter. It
includes some new test cases, but not all of the new tests failed
before.
diff -ru DBI-1.40/DBI.pm DBI-1.40-new/DBI.p
