Re: DBI package problem?

2010-10-13 Thread rosenfield . albert
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Tim Bunce tim.bu...@pobox.com wrote: On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 03:29:11PM +0200, rosenfield.alb...@gmail.com wrote: Where do you get the 70%/30% ratio from? Uploaded a package to CPAN with  - a test that fails when DBI is not installed, and  - a Build.PL which

Re: DBI package problem?

2010-09-06 Thread rosenfield . albert
Where do you get the 70%/30% ratio from? Uploaded a package to CPAN with - a test that fails when DBI is not installed, and - a Build.PL which does not indicate that DBI is a requirement (even though it is). I'd like to see details of the specific underlying problems that cause build

Re: DBI package problem?

2010-09-06 Thread Tim Bunce
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 03:29:11PM +0200, rosenfield.alb...@gmail.com wrote: Where do you get the 70%/30% ratio from? Uploaded a package to CPAN with - a test that fails when DBI is not installed, and - a Build.PL which does not indicate that DBI is a requirement (even though it is).

Re: DBI package problem?

2010-05-10 Thread Tim Bunce
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 11:40:35PM +0200, rosenfield.alb...@gmail.com wrote: In practice this results in circa 70% of smoke testers running the module with DBI installed. The remaining 30% however, fails with this error: = # Failed test 'use DBI;' # at

Re: DBI package problem?

2010-05-10 Thread Martin J. Evans
On 10/05/2010 17:44, Tim Bunce wrote: On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 11:40:35PM +0200, rosenfield.alb...@gmail.com wrote: In practice this results in circa 70% of smoke testers running the module with DBI installed. The remaining 30% however, fails with this error:

Re: DBI package problem?

2010-05-02 Thread rosenfield . albert
Tim writes: I'm curious about the environment you're targeting that doesn't have a compiler. Can you enlighten me? Target is any one of the 3.5% of systems where DBI doesn't install for one reason or another (see cpantesters stats for latest stable build). I'd happily take a patch to

Re: DBI package problem?

2010-04-15 Thread Tim Bunce
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 12:42:44AM +0200, rosenfield.alb...@gmail.com wrote: • dependencies I still think that DBI should be XS, and people should really try very very hard to make that work. Pure-perl DBI won't fly. Modules and applications that are now depending on DBI do not want to

Re: DBI package problem?

2010-04-06 Thread rosenfield . albert
Here's a code example (attached). Extract it to some folder. Run the tests with Perl. Doesn't include an installer, so remember to include the library folder, FBI: $ perl -IFBI/ 00_test.pl message from XS core! $ perl -IFBI/ 01_test.pl another message from XS core! You can set the

Re: DBI package problem?

2010-03-29 Thread H.Merijn Brand
On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 23:40:35 +0200, rosenfield.alb...@gmail.com wrote: What is the preferred way of allowing a driver to use either DBI::PurePerl or DBI? Because DBI::PurePerl is inside the DBI package, the only way to disable DBI is to make your C compiler unavailable. requiring

Re: DBI package problem?

2010-03-29 Thread H.Merijn Brand
On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 19:29:59 +0200, rosenfield.alb...@gmail.com wrote: FWIW I am not the one going to implement this. May I enquire why not? 1. I'm just a co-maint for DBI. I take no decisions in areas that affect that much. (I just a bit responsible for DBD::File and some docs. And