erl "object",
even a single hash. Some potential names could be:
DBD::Object
DBD::Tree
DBD::TreeObject
DBD::NestedObject
Which one would work best?
--
Brendan Byrd
System Integration Analyst (NOC Web Developer)
-Original Message-----
From: Tim Bunce [mailto:tim.bu...@pobox.com]
Se
ot;, even a single hash. Some potential names could be:
>
> DBD::Object
> DBD::Tree
> DBD::TreeObject
> DBD::NestedObject
>
> Which one would work best?
>
> --
> Brendan Byrd
> System Integration Analyst (NOC Web Developer)
>
> -Original Message-
>
ing.
>
> From: dub...@gmail.com [mailto:dub...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Jeff Zucker
> Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2011 12:57 PM
> To: dbi-dev@perl.org
> Cc: Byrd, Brendan
> Subject: Re: New NestedHash module needs home
>
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 7:50 AM, Jonathan Leffl
On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 17:29:57 +, "Byrd, Brendan"
wrote:
> DBD::NestedHash - This could also be its own Perl module within CPAN.
> However, the hash to table conversion is such a thin wrapper around
> DBD::AnyData that it just seems to make more sense to actually tie it
> into that module someh
f Zucker
Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2011 12:57 PM
To: dbi-dev@perl.org
Cc: Byrd, Brendan
Subject: Re: New NestedHash module needs home
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 7:50 AM, Jonathan Leffler
mailto:jonathan.leff...@gmail.com>> wrote:
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 10:29, Byrd, Brendan
mailto:by
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 7:50 AM, Jonathan Leffler <
jonathan.leff...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 10:29, Byrd, Brendan
> wrote:
>
> > I currently have a working and tested model for a “nested hash to table”
>
> > conversion. [...]
> >
> > ** **
> >
> > *AnyData::Format::NestedH
Did you consider DBIx::NestedHash? Would that make any sense?
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 10:29, Byrd, Brendan wrote:
> I currently have a working and tested model for a “nested hash to table”
> conversion. [...]
>
> ** **
>
> My dilemma is: Where exactly should this kind of module go in the CPAN
