From: Tim Bunce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday 07 October 2005 04:39
> To: Jonathan Leffler
> Cc: Rutherdale, Will; List - DBI users
> Subject: Re: Perl DBI and threads.pm
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 07:42:14PM -0700, Jonathan Leffler wrote:
> > On 10/6/05, R
On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 07:42:14PM -0700, Jonathan Leffler wrote:
> On 10/6/05, Rutherdale, Will <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > We have some Perl DBI scripts and have been running them on a Perl
> > compiled
> > with threading disabled. (I.e. perl -V gives ...usethreads=undef...). I
> > also hav
day 07 October 2005 04:39
To: Jonathan Leffler
Cc: Rutherdale, Will; List - DBI users
Subject: Re: Perl DBI and threads.pm
On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 07:42:14PM -0700, Jonathan Leffler wrote:
> On 10/6/05, Rutherdale, Will <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > We have some Perl DBI s
On Thu, 2005-10-06 at 19:42, Jonathan Leffler wrote:
> My understanding is that a Perl with multi-threading where you do not use
> the multithreading should be as stable as a Perl without the multithreading.
> However, there's a chance that some modules may not be so happy. OTOH, DBI
> shouldn't b
On 10/6/05, Rutherdale, Will <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We have some Perl DBI scripts and have been running them on a Perl
> compiled
> with threading disabled. (I.e. perl -V gives ...usethreads=undef...). I
> also have another environment where Perl is compiled with
> usethreads=define
> and ha
Hi.
We have some Perl DBI scripts and have been running them on a Perl compiled
with threading disabled. (I.e. perl -V gives ...usethreads=undef...). I
also have another environment where Perl is compiled with usethreads=define
and have found the threading capabilities useful. (This is the Perl
