Jeff Zucker wrote:
Alec Brecher wrote:
I run DBD::Pg 1.22 on a windows host successfully. I initially tried
DBD::PgPP and found it buggy. The Pg installation took a fair amount of
fussing but runs very well. -Alec
Whoa, you are a better man than I am, Alec :-).
Oops, I take it back :-). I miss
Alec Brecher wrote:
I run DBD::Pg 1.22 on a windows host successfully. I initially tried
DBD::PgPP and found it buggy. The Pg installation took a fair amount of
fussing but runs very well. -Alec
Whoa, you are a better man than I am, Alec :-). I was never able to get
past the fussing stage. Wel
I run DBD::Pg 1.22 on a windows host successfully. I initially tried
DBD::PgPP and found it buggy. The Pg installation took a fair amount of
fussing but runs very well. -Alec
> Could you also tell us a bit about the issue of installation on windows
> - will DBD::Pg be able to find the libraries
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> Could you also tell us a bit about the issue of installation on windows
> - will DBD::Pg be able to find the libraries it needs and compile on
> windows? will there also be binary versions available for download?
> Many people are using DBD::PgP
Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Well it has finally happened. PG is native on Windows. Does anyone know if
DBD::PgPP will work with it or do I need to wait for an updated DBD?
DBD::Pg will work just fine against 8.0, although the soon-to-be-released
v
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> Well it has finally happened. PG is native on Windows. Does anyone know if
> DBD::PgPP will work with it or do I need to wait for an updated DBD?
DBD::Pg will work just fine against 8.0, although the soon-to-be-released
version (1.33) will have
