On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 8:43 PM, Matt S Trout wrote:
> As such, I petition the PAUSE administration to leave things alone while
> the
> community sorts things out
>
>
Sure. We've always maintained that there was no rush and that discussion
was the best course of action.
I
(bcced again to the modules list)
On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 08:43:03AM +, Andrew Beverley wrote:
> Given that there was no formal vote, I think this is a somewhat hasty
> and unfair conclusion. It's a bit like having an election with only one
> party, having people vote, and then mentioning a
>Given that there was no formal vote, I think this is a somewhat hasty
>and unfair conclusion. It's a bit like having an election with only one
>party, having people vote, and then mentioning a second party later
>once the election's finished. I personally was just about to vote in
>favour of the
On 30 Oct 2016, at 19:43, Andrew Beverley wrote:
> Personally I would like to see a straightforward "A vs B" vote. Only
> then will I consider this a fair decision.
+1
--
Charlie Garrison
github.com/cngarrison metacpan.org/author/CNG
On Sat, 29 Oct 2016 20:47:20 -0400 David Golden wrote:
> I'm very pleased to see how the DBIC community has engaged in honest
> discussion about self-governance. It's been a long road, but one
> that I think will serve the community well going forward.
>
> I'll make the changes in