Hi,
We recently started a project using DBMail, and we added it to our
searchable mailing list archive here:
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/
to help us track down some problems. If you have any problems or
questions about it, please feel free to contact me off-list.
Thank
Paul J Stevens wrote:
This can be done in 2.1.x, which however is not advisable yet for
production installs.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So I am considering using LDAP for auth with DBMail.
Can someone explain how distribution lists would work with DBMail/LDAP?
i.e. [EMAIL PROTECTED] to all
Hi all!
After 1-2 months testing dbmail I have installed it on our main mail
server. Now everything is ALMOST fine, but some questions still not
resolved. The first question about dbmail-util.
If we run dbmail-util -arf our database starts performing
OPTIMIZE TABLE procedure.
Everything Ok, except
Kevin Baker wrote:
> Paul J Stevens wrote:
>
>>This can be done in 2.1.x, which however is not advisable yet for
>>production installs.
>>
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>>
>>>So I am considering using LDAP for auth with DBMail.
>>>
>>>Can someone explain how distribution lists would work with
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> -rw-rw 1 mysql4 mysql4 23995613184 Oct 20 11:47 dbmail_messageblks.ibd
he! are those innodb table spaces? Been reading about them, but haven't
used them yet..
> Table "dbmail_messageblks" has almost 24Gb size (we have about 45000
> emails each day!). So when "O
Hi.
Does this mean dbmail doesn't support the QUOTA extension at all?
* OK dbmail imap (protocol version 4r1) server 2.0.7 ready to run
A0 CAPABILITY
* CAPABILITY IMAP4 IMAP4rev1 AUTH=LOGIN ACL NAMESPACE SORT
A0 OK CAPABILITY completed
--Martin
Not yet. Quota are implemented at the account root level, and the
framework is in place for full QUOTA capabilities. But currently the
mailbox size is not being tracked at all, which is a requirement for
this to work.
Martin Strand wrote:
> Hi.
> Does this mean dbmail doesn't support the QUOTA ext
Ok, will it be implemented in 2.2?
I'm asking cause I'm developing a simple IMAP client - if dbmail won't
support QUOTA within the near future, I'll just skip that part in the
client since everyone who'll use that client will also use our IMAP server.
But currently the mailbox size is not b
If anybody now how to do optimize MySQL tables in such hard terms
- please answer.
I'm open to suggestions and ideas here. I've been having this very same
problem.
http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/4.1/en/merge-storage-engine.html
Big RDBMS (Sybase, Oracle) have advanced table partitioning fea
Ah, that'll help.
Looks like mysql-5 will have what we need:
http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.1/en/partitioning.html
I see it's on the TODO list for postgresql
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs.TODO.html
Eugene Prokopiev wrote:
>>> If anybody now how to do optimize MySQL tables in such ha
Martin Strand wrote:
> Ok, will it be implemented in 2.2?
Not likely. In 2.3+.
> I'm asking cause I'm developing a simple IMAP client - if dbmail won't
> support QUOTA within the near future, I'll just skip that part in the
> client since everyone who'll use that client will also use our IMAP
On Thu, 20 Oct 2005 15:20:00 +0200, Paul J Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Martin Strand wrote:
Ok, will it be implemented in 2.2?
Not likely. In 2.3+.
I'm asking cause I'm developing a simple IMAP client - if dbmail won't
support QUOTA within the near future, I'll just skip that part
Martin Strand wrote:
> It's just that I had this user once who received a message which was 3
> times bigger than her maxmail_size. The message only appeared in
> 'messages' but not in 'messageblks'. This was on dbmail 1.2.x though.
If that is still the case in 2.0+, that would indeed be a bug
Hi!
I am currently developing a small web based managing tool for dbmail. I
use dbmail with MySQL. I realized that messages from physmessage table
and so messageblks table are not deleted after deleting a user from
users table. I cannot found any constraint that would do the job. I have
had a
On Thu, 2005-10-20 at 17:28 +0200, Kertész Viktor wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I am currently developing a small web based managing tool for dbmail. I
> use dbmail with MySQL. I realized that messages from physmessage table
> and so messageblks table are not deleted after deleting a user from
> users table
Merge tables are mainly based for having two identical tables then
'merging' them together with a third. I am guessing that he wants RAID
chucks in the 'create table' statement. Also, InnoDB has built in
functionality to create new files and roll over...
http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/4.1/en/i
16 matches
Mail list logo