On 2016-07-15 13:00, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 15.07.2016 um 13:55 schrieb Gordan Bobic:
On 2016-07-15 12:33, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 15.07.2016 um 13:26 schrieb Gordan Bobic:
On 2016-07-15 12:24, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 15.07.2016 um 13:12 schrieb Gordan Bobic:
On 2016-07-15 12:01, Reindl
On 2016-07-15 12:33, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 15.07.2016 um 13:26 schrieb Gordan Bobic:
On 2016-07-15 12:24, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 15.07.2016 um 13:12 schrieb Gordan Bobic:
On 2016-07-15 12:01, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 15.07.2016 um 12:58 schrieb Gordan Bobic:
On 2016-07-15 11:43, Admin
On 2016-07-15 12:24, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 15.07.2016 um 13:12 schrieb Gordan Bobic:
On 2016-07-15 12:01, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 15.07.2016 um 12:58 schrieb Gordan Bobic:
On 2016-07-15 11:43, Admin Beckspaced wrote:
i see there's also a systemd folder in the 3.2.3 version:
https
On 2016-07-15 12:01, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 15.07.2016 um 12:58 schrieb Gordan Bobic:
On 2016-07-15 11:43, Admin Beckspaced wrote:
i see there's also a systemd folder in the 3.2.3 version:
https://github.com/pjstevns/dbmail/tree/master/systemd
and some makefiles
sorry ... i'm no linux
On 2016-07-15 11:43, Admin Beckspaced wrote:
as a workaround i wrote a tiny shell script checking if dbmail-imapd
is
running and if not then start a process
since upgrading to 3.2.3 no crash has been reported so far ...
keeping
fingers crossed ;)
should be handeled by the init system these
On 2016-07-14 12:59, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 14.07.2016 um 13:49 schrieb Admin Beckspaced:
Am 12.07.2016 um 16:24 schrieb Admin Beckspaced:
i just upgraded dbmail from 3.1.17 to most recent stable 3.2.3
with the old version 3.1.17 i could do an IMAP account setup in
thunderbird with SSL/TLS
On 2016-07-14 13:13, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 14.07.2016 um 13:57 schrieb Ken Drummond:
On 14-07-16 6:29 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 12.07.2016 um 16:24 schrieb Admin Beckspaced:
i just upgraded dbmail from 3.1.17 to most recent stable 3.2.3
with the old version 3.1.17 i could do an IMAP
Deadlocks can occur even with a _single_ server and no clustering,
unless you are running with transaction isolation level set to
"serializable", which comes with a massive performance penalty (it will
give you write concurrency of 1, i.e. as bad as MyISAM).
On 14/02/16 12:36, Matt . wrote:
Apart from making sure you are using the long INSERT format, you
will almost certainly find that bumping up the size of the
InnoDB logs will help, and disabling InnoDB flushing at trx
commit and doublewrite will help massively to reduce the
import time.
Obviously, re-enable the flush at trx
On 2015-02-05 14:36, Casper Langemeijer wrote:
On 05-02-15 15:11, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 05.02.2015 um 15:00 schrieb Curtis Maurand:
Thanks, I'll give that a shot while i look at replicatuon which I've
never been able to make work
there is nothing difficult and is configured within 5
On 2015-02-05 13:59, Andrea Brancatelli wrote:
Don't mistreat mysqldump, if used correctly it's powerfull.
It's reasonably powerful, but for datasets larger than a few GB
the process is slow to back up, and unworkably slow to restore.
Especially if you have binary-logging enabled you can
Hi,
I am due to be upgrading my mail server soon. I am currently using
dbmail (old 2.2.x).
The question I am currently trying to answer is whether in the past few
years dbmail has gained the advantage of being able to use full text
search capabilities of the modern RDBMSes. Back when I
On 02/02/2012 06:33 PM, Paul J Stevens wrote:
On 02/02/2012 02:32 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
SELECT DISTINCT m.message_idnr FROM dbmail_mimeparts k LEFT JOIN
dbmail_partlists l ON k.id=l.part_id LEFT JOIN
dbmail_physmessage p ON l.physmessage_id=p.id LEFT JOIN dbmail_header h ON
How does your CPU time get measured? Does it include iowait time? If
so, it could just be the period during which the caches are getting
warmed up.
Gordan
On Wed, 2 Nov 2011 20:59:54 +1300, Simon grem...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi There,
We are running dbmail 2.2.17 on a debian squeeze VM. It has
On 10/31/2011 09:34 PM, Simon wrote:
Hi There,
This may be slightly OT… but I'm wondering if someone would be able to
give me a few pointers new dbmail mysql VM please?
Currently it has 2 VCPUs (Xeon E5645 @ 2.4GHz) and 1GB RAM (note: this
is only in testing, no mail flow to it or no client
On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 21:11:26 +1300, Simon grem...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi There,
I know this has been discussed on the list off and on and i have
searched and reviewed the list for these.. but i would just like to
get peoples opinion of the best strategy to move forward with…
We have DBmail 2.2.17
On 03/10/2011 07:47 PM, Rafał Radecki wrote:
Hi All. I am configuring a mail server with postfix and dbmail with
postgresql. As I see in dbmail.conf POP listens on TCP 110 and IMAP on
TCP 143, there are no certificates or keys to add. Is there a way to use
POP/IMAP securely (SSL/TLS) in
Larry H. wrote:
I have two dbmail 2.2.17 servers using MySQL in a multi-master setup. I only
have pop3, imap and lmtp running on the primary master and all incoming mail
is received on the primary master. Basically the second master is a hot
standby for failover. Every few days the replication
Larry H. wrote:
I haven't gone as far as doing a full dump and restore just yet.
That's probably a good place to start. You absolutely have to make sure
beyond any doubt that the data is in sync. That means preventing all the
writes to the master DB while you are dumping.
One trick you
rsync pass with the master DB off.
The reason to do it 2-pass is to minimize the downtime in the 2nd pass
since most of the data won't need to be changed again.
Gordan
Gordan Bobic wrote:
Larry H. wrote:
I haven't gone as far as doing a full dump and restore just yet.
That's probably
On 01/13/2011 06:39 PM, Paul J Stevens wrote:
On 01/13/2011 06:34 PM, Larry H. wrote:
So just to clarify I would be rsyncing the contents of the dbmail database
folder (/var/lib/mysql/dbmail) to the slave. Then stopping the master and
rsyncing the innodb log files in (/var/lib/mysql) to the
On 01/13/2011 09:51 PM, Paul J Stevens wrote:
On 01/13/2011 09:07 PM, Gordan Bobic wrote:
You'll find the master will grind to a halt anyway while you're doing
this, as soon as the write-ahead log fills up. With small-ish databases
it's not a big deal, but if the size is in the 100GB+ range
zamri wrote:
Can I collect opinions here about favorite/least favorite spam
filtering packages, for use in a dbmail environment?
What have you had luck with? What works best? What's your opinion?
Which should a happy dbmail (postfix) user, now getting too much
spam, use for
Tomas Kuliavas wrote:
Can I collect opinions here about favorite/least favorite spam
filtering packages, for use in a dbmail environment?
What have you had luck with? What works best? What's your opinion?
Which should a happy dbmail (postfix) user, now getting too much
On 12/30/2010 05:54 PM, Tomas Kuliavas wrote:
Can I collect opinions here about favorite/least favorite spam
filtering packages, for use in a dbmail environment?
What have you had luck with? What works best? What's your opinion?
Which should a happy dbmail (postfix) user,
On 12/30/2010 08:56 PM, edac...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
It's broken because it demonstrably fails, by it's very design, to work
reliably in a very real and valid scenario.
very real - for spammers and misconfigured setups.
gmail is a misconfigured setup and/or a major spam source? News to me.
Lou Picciano wrote:
Can I collect opinions here about favorite/least favorite spam filtering
packages, for use in a dbmail environment?
What have you had luck with? What works best? What's your opinion? Which
should a happy dbmail (postfix) user, now getting too much spam, use for
Larry H. wrote:
I use Mailscanner to manage spamassassin and clamav. You can configure
spamassassin to use RBLs and/or a bayesian filter.
What possible reason could there be for using MailScanner and
SpamAssassin if you are only going to filter based on ClamAV and RBLs?
Both are hookable
I'm trying to get this to work using OpenLDAP 2.4 (RHEL6), and according
to this:
http://www.dbmail.org/dokuwiki/doku.php/stunnel
It should work based on what is in /etc/openldap/ldap.conf without
having to fall back on stunnel if I omit the URL and HOSTNAME parameters
in dbmail.conf's [LDAP]
Marc Dirix wrote:
I think 2.2.10 does not seem to suffer from it.
As I tried to downgrade earlier I got into problems with strtoul.
So 2.2.10 works but 2.2.11 doesn't?
Gordan
___
DBmail mailing list
DBmail@dbmail.org
Marc Dirix wrote:
I think 2.2.10 does not seem to suffer from it.
As I tried to downgrade earlier I got into problems with strtoul.
I just rolled back to 2.2.9 and the problem disappeared. Yet another
upgrade exclusion in my yum.conf. Thanks to those of you who pointed out
that the bug was
Hi,
I'm seeing an odd issue with the IMAP folders. If I have multiple
sub-folders, When I check folders on a higher level, I see the higher level
folder multiple times, once per subfolder.
For example, if I have I the following folders:
Mail/foo
Mail/bar
Mail/baz
I'll see the Mail folder
15:15:58 +0200, Paul J Stevens p...@nfg.nl wrote:
Gordan Bobic wrote:
Is this a DBmail misconfiguration? Or corruption in my mail database? Is
there anything that can be done about this?
this is a known dbmail bug in 2.2, fixed already in 2.3.
But since no of my dbmail-2.2 users complain
On Mon, 29 Jun 2009 15:15:58 +0200, Paul J Stevens p...@nfg.nl wrote:
Gordan Bobic wrote:
Is this a DBmail misconfiguration? Or corruption in my mail database? Is
there anything that can be done about this?
this is a known dbmail bug in 2.2, fixed already in 2.3.
But since no of my
On 27/05/2009 23:01, Andreja Babic wrote:
I am using roundcube webmail as front end for dbmail imap server and
after login it takes ages to open huge mailbox. I would appreciate if
you know and tell me if there is any trick to increase speed of fetch
on dbmail.
Have you enabled Roundcube's
09:31:36 +0200, Paul Stevens p...@nfg.nl wrote:
Gordan Bobic wrote:
USER_OBJECTCLASS = top,account,dbmailUser
Other than the fact that I can't seem to add the object class to an
existing user to a class violation somewhere. :-/
then you are most likely missing a required attribute
I'm currently using DBMail in standalone mode, and my Postfix domain and
recipient maps are as follows:
main.cf:
mydestination = $myhostname, localhost.localdomain, localhost,
mysql:/etc/postfix/sql-domains.cf
local_recipient_maps = mysql:/etc/postfix/sql-recipients.cf
proxy:unix:passwd.byname
ldapmodify and perform CRUD operations on
domains and users.
Gordan Bobic wrote:
I'm currently using DBMail in standalone mode, and my Postfix domain and
recipient maps are as follows:
main.cf:
mydestination = $myhostname, localhost.localdomain, localhost,
mysql:/etc/postfix/sql
Hi,
Can anyone confirm if this is the most up to date LDAP schema that
should be used with 2.2.11?
http://svn.ic-s.nl/websvn/filedetails.php?repname=DBMailpath=%2Ftrunk%2Fdbmail%2Fdbmail.schemarev=1828sc=0
Thanks.
Gordan
___
DBmail mailing list
Feally wrote:
See -
http://git.dbmail.eu/cgit/cgit.cgi/paul/dbmail/tree/dbmail.schema?h=dbmail_2_2
We no longer use svn. I'm not sure as to how correct this schema is, but
it should be better than what that old svn version shows.
-Jon
Gordan Bobic wrote:
Hi,
Can anyone confirm
Jonathan Feally wrote:
[...]
You should have also read README.ldap from the tarball.
Indeed I did, but the documentation isn't exactly extensive. :(
Gordan
___
DBmail mailing list
DBmail@dbmail.org
Aaron Stone wrote:
Please read the DBMail config file's [LDAP] section. It is designed to
interact with essentially arbitrary schemas, you simply tell it what the
field names are it'll use them. You are encouraged to use your existing
schema as much as possible.
There's no need to convert
James Greig wrote:
Hi,
I've probably asked this before however can someone remind me why mysql
master-master (innodb) replication is not recommend with dbmail?
It's not recommended with anything. By the very nature of it, there is
a potential very nasty race condition inherent in
could use it with pop3 and lmtp without a problem.
On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 18:56 +0100, Gordan Bobic wrote:
James Greig wrote:
Hi,
I've probably asked this before however can someone remind me why mysql
master-master (innodb) replication is not recommend with dbmail?
It's not recommended
Paul J Stevens wrote:
I've probably asked this before however can someone remind me why mysql
master-master (innodb) replication is not recommend with dbmail?
It's not recommended with anything. By the very nature of it, there is
a potential very nasty race condition inherent in multi-master
James Greig wrote:
Some good points raised on the subject. I thought it might spark a few
posts.
Just so people are aware, i've currently setup two remote postfix/dbmail
machines
Server 1 (postfix + dbmail + mysql)
server 2 (postfix + dbmail + mysql)
Both in master-master replicating and
46 matches
Mail list logo
