I would like to see this as a compile-time or even
betterr run-time option. We would like dbmail sends
a permanant error instead of temp. in case or full
mbx.
I think that dbmail 1.2.x sends permanant error in
this case
Ming-Wei
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
I don't know if this is going to help, but
you can try to compile dbmail with different
CFLAGS, maybe it is a compiler (triggered) bug.
try these if you haven't done this already
-O2 -fomit-frame-pointer
-O -fomit-frame-pointer
-fomit-frame-pointer
look at the gcc info pages for other flags
Ming
oops, should have changed the subject
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Shih Ming-Wei
Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2004 17:25
To: DBMail mailinglist
Subject: RE: [Dbmail] SMTP Auth
Last week our mail server with innodb got corrupted,
neither
Last week our mail server with innodb got corrupted,
neither the server nor did mysqld crash, so this
might be a mysql bug. Anyway mysqldummp won't dump
anything from messageblks and I found an other (slow)
way to get the data which aren't corrupted yet.
I recovered more 99% of the mails, lost lik
in hearing more about this.
-- Jason
On May 6, 2004, at 10:41 AM, Shih Ming-Wei wrote:
> I have postfix+sals+pam-mysqldbmail working wiht Sparc64/Gentoo Linux,
> if some one is interested I can provide more info
>
> Ming-Wei
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMA
I have postfix+sals+pam-mysqldbmail working wiht Sparc64/Gentoo Linux,
if some one is interested I can provide more info
Ming-Wei
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Peter Darley
Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2004 16:35
To: DBMail mailinglist
Subjec
> I have my dbmail+postfix+amavis_new+fprot server running and im
> blocking 7000 spams+virus a day (2,555,000 per year !outch!).
>
> Well so much for spams comming from the internet.
> Yesterday i made a small script using a mysql querry
> and the linux sort program to get a cumulative
> reado
Hi,
We are using postfix -> content filtering (rav AV/AS) ->
postfix -> dbmail, you can replace RAV with any other
content filters of your choice
Ming-Wei
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Jesse Norell
Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2004 18:10
To
2 x Sun Sparc E220 in failover
- Dual CPU 2x450Mhz UltraSparc IIi
- 1 GB MEM
- running postfix + dbmail 1.1. -> 1.2 -> 1.2.1 + dbmail-pop3d
- 15 K users
- Mysql 4.0.x
- OS: Gentoo/Linux
- antivirus + antispam software
cheers
Mign-Wei
in your source tree type (if you are using bash):
export CFLAGS="-O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe"
export CXXFLAGS="-O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe"
./configure
make
hope this helps
Ming-Wei
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of becki
Sent: Monda
What right comes to my mind is the DNS resolving, can
you check you forward and reverse dns lookup, with and
without internet connection?
Ming-Wei
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf
> Of becki
> Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 11:52 AM
> To:
try using "-O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe" as you CFLAGS
Ming-Wei
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of dbmail
beckspaced.com
Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2003 8:37 PM
To: dbmail@dbmail.org
Subject: [Dbmail] version 1.2.1 dbmail-pop3d & imapd 99% C
We will only win if you can add -fomit-frame-pointer
in the configure/Makefile :) Can you do that for the next
release Eelco?
Ming-Wei
BTW thanks for this great product
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf
> Of Eelco van Beek - IC&S
> Sent: T
because the
> >>standard calling sequence automatically handles the frame
> pointer and
> >>nothing is saved by pretending it doesn't exist. The
> >>machine-description macro FRAME_POINTER_REQUIRED controls whether a
> >>target machine supports this fl
-O, -O2, -O3, -Os.
>
> As being told in the gcc man :)
>
> Eelco
>
>
> On 28-okt-03, at 10:20, Shih Ming-Wei wrote:
>
> > I don't think -O -O1 and -O2 impliciet -fomit-fram-pointer
> > not sure about -O3
> >
> > Ming-Wei
> >
> > > -
-okt-03, at 23:08, Bret Baptist wrote:
>
> > On Friday 24 October 2003 5:35 am, Shih Ming-Wei wrote:
> >> hi,
> >>
> >> I have solve the 99% CPU usage on Linux/sparc systems that
> >> we are using, apparently changing CFLAGS from "-O2 -pipe" to
] 100% cpu usage with dbmail-pop3d --
> SOLVED, for me
> at least
>
>
> On Friday 24 October 2003 5:35 am, Shih Ming-Wei wrote:
> > hi,
> >
> > I have solve the 99% CPU usage on Linux/sparc systems that
> > we are using, apparently changing CFLAGS from "-O2
hi,
I have solve the 99% CPU usage on Linux/sparc systems that
we are using, apparently changing CFLAGS from "-O2 -pipe" to
"-march=v8 -mtune=v9 -O2 -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer" cahnges
the CPU usage from 99% to max 1.8% (avg 0.4 %). So my
conclusion is this is not a dbmail bug but dbmail must trig
Of Shih Ming-Wei
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 7:23 PM
To: dbmail@dbmail.org
Subject: [Dbmail] pop3d and cpu usage
Hi,
Just saw 1.2 released today, tried to see if there
were any imporvements on the cpu usage for pop3d,
but helas no, one of the cpu is still being used @
100%, I did a strace
Hi,
Just saw 1.2 released today, tried to see if there
were any imporvements on the cpu usage for pop3d,
but helas no, one of the cpu is still being used @
100%, I did a strace while this is happening
and I see awful lot of writes.
I am running dbmail 1.2 + mysql 4.0.13 on Gentoo
Linux/sparc
Any
I have been reporting the pop3 high load a long time ago (1 year),
till now we still don't have a solid solution, I will try you patch.
I am not a experienced programmer, but from what I understand, one
should use non-blocking methode with accept() and select(), but this
is more for the incoming t
Yes I do, and posting several times on this list resulted nothing, aparently
nobody else had the same problem.
Mine was using 99% of the cpu on no matter what machine (233 PC, 450 ultrasparc)
Ming-Wei
> -Original Message-
> From: Markus Welsch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, F
hursday 05 September 2002 09:59 am, Shih Ming-Wei wrote:
> RC3 and cvs, I just build dbmail on a new machine (sun T1, ultrasparc
> 500Mhz, 512 MB, 2x17Gb UW SCSI with gentoo Linux) with just one test user
> and one test mail (6 MB) and the pop3d is using more than 96% of CPU and
> slow as
RC3 and cvs, I just build dbmail on a new machine (sun T1, ultrasparc
500Mhz, 512 MB, 2x17Gb UW SCSI with gentoo Linux) with just one test user
and one test mail (6 MB) and the pop3d is using more than 96% of CPU and
slow as hell?
Please does someone know where the problem might be?
Now I have tr
sorry for bothering you guys,
I made a typo in the config file
Ming-Wei
-Original Message-
From: Shih Ming-Wei [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 7:17 PM
To: 'dbmail@dbmail.org'
Subject: RE: [Dbmail] strange diliver error
Eelco,
I have seen your m
79B32 6438 Thu Aug 29 19:00:34 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TIA
-Original Message-
From: Shih Ming-Wei [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 6:57 PM
To: 'dbmail@dbmail.org'
Subject: RE: [Dbmail] strange diliver er
18:52:13 phobos postfix/master[4344]: warning: /usr/lib/postfix/pipe:
bad command startup -- throttling
-Original Message-
From: Shih Ming-Wei [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 6:36 PM
To: 'dbmail@dbmail.org'
Subject: [Dbmail] strange diliver error
I h
I have set up dbmail + postfix on a sparc running Linux,
but the mail won't delever (the alias, mailbox and user exist)
when I try ./dbmail-smtp -d [EMAIL PROTECTED] < config.h
it works.
I double check the postfix config with a working one (Linux on i386)
and found no difference.
Apparently the a
02 10:56AM >>>
What is wrong with the speed of pop3? We're running dbmail for 22.000
users all using pop3. No problems at all...
Best regards,
Eelco
Shih Ming-Wei heeft op dinsdag, 27 aug 2002 om 10:51 (Europe/Amsterdam)
het volgende geschreven:
> I really love dbmail and I am g
AM
To: dbmail@dbmail.org
Subject: Re: [Dbmail] Imapd is slow as hell
What is wrong with the speed of pop3? We're running dbmail for 22.000
users all using pop3. No problems at all...
Best regards,
Eelco
Shih Ming-Wei heeft op dinsdag, 27 aug 2002 om 10:51 (Europe/Amsterdam)
het volgende geschreve
I really love dbmail and I am going to implement it on a system for 5k - 10K
users, but I need
a solution for the speed of pop3, can any developer help me? Or at least
help me to locate the
problem
TIA
Ming-Wei
-Original Message-
From: Shih Ming-Wei [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
thx
-Original Message-
From: Micah Stevens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 10:44 PM
To: dbmail@dbmail.org
Subject: RE: [Dbmail] Company References for DbMail ?
Okay,
Here's my current version, I sent a previous one to Sam, but it was pretty
screwey. I think t
t: Re: [Dbmail] Imapd is slow as hell
On Monday 26 August 2002 04:43 am, Shih Ming-Wei wrote:
> My imap is working fine but pop3 is very slow, I have ask a few
> times on the list but apparently nobody is interested :(
Have you checked out the suggested database indexing mentioned on the
mailing
l
I am interested too, may I ask you for a copy?
Ming-Wei
-Original Message-
From: Micah Stevens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2002 3:14 AM
To: dbmail@dbmail.org
Subject: Re: [Dbmail] Company References for DbMail ?
I'd be embarrassed to give it to you right now, bu
My imap is working fine but pop3 is very slow, I have ask a few
times on the list but apparently nobody is interested :(
Ming-Wei
-Original Message-
From: John Wall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 9:24 AM
To: dbmail@dbmail.org
Subject: [Dbmail] Imapd is slow as he
Isn't anyone else who is experiencing the same problem?
Ming-Wei
-Original Message-
From: Shih Ming-Wei [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 5:39 PM
To: 'dbmail@dbmail.org'
Subject: RE: [Dbmail] performance pop3
just tried CFLAGS = -Wall -D_BSD_SOURCE
I have just pulled cvs of yesterday, and imapd works, recently do you mean
today?
Ming-Wei
-Original Message-
From: Sam Przyswa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 6:45 PM
To: DBMail Mailinglist
Subject: [Dbmail] dbmail-imap and Netscape
Hi,
DBmail-imap don't work
37 matches
Mail list logo
