Re: [Dbmail] Average Inbox Load Times (Eric Hiller)

2011-07-12 Thread Eric Hiller
ject: Re: [Dbmail] Average Inbox Load Times (Eric Hiller) > > Also iirc the "Size" column in the display requires it to actually > download every message to calculate the size, so should run faster > without that (though maybe that's only older dbmail versions ?) >

[Dbmail] Average Inbox Load Times

2011-07-11 Thread Eric Hiller
I start doing serious investigation. Thanks! -Eric ___ DBmail mailing list DBmail@dbmail.org http://mailman.fastxs.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbmail

Re: [Dbmail] auto_notify auto_reply

2011-05-05 Thread Eric Hiller
nputs from the community if he like them * if he not like some things you can pay him to like them too :-) Am 06.05.2011 00:04, schrieb Eric Hiller: > I thought that auto_reply and auto_notify were completely unsupported at this > point? > > Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 22:54:

Re: [Dbmail] auto_notify auto_reply

2011-05-05 Thread Eric Hiller
I thought that auto_reply and auto_notify were completely unsupported at this point? Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 22:54:04 +0200 From: h.rei...@thelounge.net To: dbmail@dbmail.org Subject: Re: [Dbmail] auto_notify auto_reply Am 05.05.2011 22:17, schrieb Eric Hiller: > Looks like the tables

[Dbmail] auto_notify auto_reply

2011-05-05 Thread Eric Hiller
Looks like the tables for these were removed entirely in 3.0 create.sql but they were not dropped in the update_2_2_3_0.sql file. Should they be removed manually? Thanks, Eric ___ DBmail mailing list DBmail

Re: [Dbmail] Forbid user from deleting folder.

2010-01-08 Thread Eric Hiller
users from doing any kinds of write actions on the mailbox. Just read. Eric Hiller wrote: >  Paul, > > Setting the permission field to 1 from 2 will allow the user to do > everything else in the mailbox (ie. read, delete, move email) just not > delete/rename the mailbox

Re: [Dbmail] Forbid user from deleting folder.

2010-01-08 Thread Eric Hiller
Paul, Setting the permission field to 1 from 2 will allow the user to do everything else in the mailbox (ie. read, delete, move email) just not delete/rename the mailbox itself correct? Thanks for the help!-Eric > Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 10:12:06 +0100 > From: p...@nfg.nl > To: dbmail@d

[Dbmail] Forbid user from deleting folder.

2010-01-07 Thread Eric Hiller
location? Thanks! -Eric _ Hotmail: Free, trusted and rich email service. http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/196390708/direct/01/___ DBmail mailing list DBmail

RE: [Dbmail] automatic purgeing of trash folder

2007-12-11 Thread Eric Hiller
bmail.org > Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2007 16:07:36 -0800 > > dbmail-export already does all of this, albeit with the overhead of > dumping the messages (to /dev/null, if you'd like). > > Aaron > > > On Wed, 2007-12-05 at 17:22 -0600, Eric Hiller wrote: > > Would thi

RE: [Dbmail] squirrelmail issues

2007-12-06 Thread Eric Hiller
; FETCH completedFETCH line:* 148 FETCH (UID 1761137 BODY[1] NIL) > > Does anyone know how to fix this. I should mention that the same message > > in Evolution just shows up without a body > > > > Squirrelmail does still let you download the attachment but all the MIME > > s

RE: [Dbmail] automatic purgeing of trash folder

2007-12-05 Thread Eric Hiller
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2007 16:07:36 -0800 > > dbmail-export already does all of this, albeit with the overhead of > dumping the messages (to /dev/null, if you'd like). > > Aaron > > > On Wed, 2007-12-05 at 17:22 -0600, Eric Hiller wrote: > > Would this work? I

RE: [Dbmail] automatic purgeing of trash folder

2007-12-05 Thread Eric Hiller
t; > Don't filter on the datefield table. It represents the Date: header of a > message, not the received date. The physmessage.internal_date represents > the received date. Which is most likely what you want. > > > Eric Hiller wrote: > > I have a spam filter that works pr

RE: [Dbmail] squirrelmail issues

2007-12-05 Thread Eric Hiller
o: dbmail@dbmail.org > Subject: Re: [Dbmail] squirrelmail issues > > can you show me such a message? > > Eric Hiller wrote: > > I have a feeling that this is a squirrelmail problem, but maybe somebody > > here has a solution. > > > > for messages that have

RE: [Dbmail] squirrelmail issues

2007-12-05 Thread Eric Hiller
What about RFC 3501 4.5 ? > Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2007 20:54:14 +0100 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Dbmail] squirrelmail issues > > Eric Hiller writes: > > It looks like the problem lies in that > > * 148 FETCH (UID 1761137

RE: [Dbmail] squirrelmail issues

2007-12-05 Thread Eric Hiller
> Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2007 20:54:14 +0100 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Dbmail] squirrelmail issues > > Eric Hiller writes: > > It looks like the problem lies in that > > * 148 FETCH (UID 1761137 BODY[1] NIL) > > Line. Is it

RE: [Dbmail] squirrelmail issues

2007-12-05 Thread Eric Hiller
uld mention that the same message in > Evolution just shows up without a body > > Squirrelmail does still let you download the attachment but all the MIME > stuff is shown as well. > > - Eric > > __

[Dbmail] squirrelmail issues

2007-12-05 Thread Eric Hiller
. - Eric _ Share life as it happens with the new Windows Live.Download today it's FREE! http://www.windowslive.com/share.html?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_Wave2_sharelife_112007___ DBmail mailing

[Dbmail] automatic purgeing of trash folder

2007-12-05 Thread Eric Hiller
_id NOT IN (SELECT physmessage_id FROM dbmail_datefield WHERE current_timestamp at time zone 'GMT' - '1 day'::interval <= datefield) AND mailbox_idnr IN (SELECT mailbox_idnr FROM dbmail_mailboxes WHERE name='Trash'); Thanks, Eric _

RE: [Dbmail] dbmail cache corrupt

2007-09-20 Thread Eric Hiller
] sortsieve.c,sort_fileinto(+340): Could not file message into mailbox; not cancelling keep. Sep 21 00:00:22 mail0 dbmail-imapd[2601]: Error:[imap] imap4.c,IMAPClientHandler(+139): [Illegal seek] on read-stream Errors any ideas? Thanks again, Eric From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: dbmail@dbmail.org

RE: [Dbmail] dbmail cache corrupt

2007-09-20 Thread Eric Hiller
] sortsieve.c,sort_fileinto(+340): Could not file message into mailbox; not cancelling keep. Sep 21 00:00:22 mail0 dbmail-imapd[2601]: Error:[imap] imap4.c,IMAPClientHandler(+139): [Illegal seek] on read-stream Errors any ideas? Thanks again, Eric From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: dbmail@dbmail.org

RE: [Dbmail] dbmail cache corrupt

2007-09-18 Thread Eric Hiller
Status Bad destination mailbox address (in reply to end of DATA command)) > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: dbmail@dbmail.org> Subject: RE: [Dbmail] dbmail cache corrupt> Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 10:21:19 +0100>> Eric i sugest you to compile

RE: [Dbmail] dbmail cache corrupt

2007-09-18 Thread Eric Hiller
how can i run 2.2.6-rc2 with apt-get? I seem to be unable to find any other packages? Thanks! > Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 11:01:30 +0200 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: dbmail@dbmail.org > Subject: Re: [Dbmail] dbmail cache corrupt > > Eric Hiller wrote: > > Wow, this nig

RE: [Dbmail] dbmail cache corrupt

2007-09-18 Thread Eric Hiller
425]: Debug:[db] dbmodule.c,db_query(+145): last query took [0] seconds dbmail-lmtpd: misc.c:534: dm_strnesc: Assertion `from' failed. Please let me know, any help would be greatly appreciated! -Eric > Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 08:58:42 +0200> Fr

[Dbmail] dbmail cache corrupt

2007-09-17 Thread Eric Hiller
? Is there a way I can export to mbox and reimport, or is that a bad idea? Thanks, I think this is gonna be a late night, - Eric _ Kick back and relax with hot games and cool activities at the Messenger Café. http

RE: [Dbmail] Restore DB & get better performance

2007-09-16 Thread Eric Hiller
reindex all indexes? > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: dbmail@dbmail.org > Subject: Re: [Dbmail] Restore DB & get better performance > Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 01:09:41 +0200 > > On Sonntag, 16. September 2007 23:20 Eric Hiller wrote: > > QUERY PLAN > > Total runtim

RE: [Dbmail] Restore DB & get better performance

2007-09-16 Thread Eric Hiller
Thats right, nearly 12 hours! Should I go through the database and just delete all the indexes and constraints and then re add them? Since it is 8.2 autovacuum does not appear in the log? How can I even tell if the autovacuum is running correctly? Thanks, Eric > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >

RE: [Dbmail] Restore DB & get better performance

2007-09-13 Thread Eric Hiller
e> Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 04:14:29 +0200>> On Freitag, 14. September 2007 01:14 Eric Hiller wrote:>> I ran vacuum full analyze; on all the databases, is that all I should>> do?>> I've increased default_statistics_target = 1000 (was 10 before) and> after vacuu

[Dbmail] Restore DB & get better performance

2007-09-13 Thread Eric Hiller
hen the sequences would be off. does anybody have a good procedure for doing this. Thanks, Eric _ Gear up for Halo® 3 with free downloads and an exclusive offer. It’s our way of saying thanks for using Windows Live™. h

RE: [Dbmail] announce: dbmail-2.2.6-rc1

2007-07-14 Thread Eric Hiller
I am currently running dbmail 2.2.1 installed with APT on debian, would installing dbmail 2.2.6rc1 break anything or should it all run fine? From: Paul J Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: DBMail mailinglist To: DBMail mailinglist ,DBMAIL Developers Mailinglist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subjec

Re: [Dbmail] deleted users mails

2007-07-13 Thread Eric Hiller
This looks to be the same issue in ticket 305. Any idea on when that will be implemented into dbmail-util? - Eric From: Paul J Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: DBMail mailinglist To: DBMail mailinglist Subject: Re: [Dbmail] deleted users mails Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 10:29:08

Re: [Dbmail] Roundcube VS SM

2007-07-13 Thread Eric Hiller
When you say you are getting slow performance with squirrelmail, how slow is slow? It takes me about 6 seconds to display my inbox with squirrelmail (130 messages) and my system is relatively unloaded @ ~200 users. It is postgres 7.4 and dbmail 2.2.1. Everytime I do anything with squirrelmail

Re: [Dbmail] 2.2.2 slow

2007-04-12 Thread Eric Hiller
I currently don't have postgresql-contribs installed, is it safe to install that and run reindexdb? Or is there a risk of it messing up my database? - Eric From: Robert Claeson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: DBMail mailinglist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: DBMail mailinglist

Re: [Dbmail] 2.2.2 slow

2007-04-09 Thread Eric Hiller
I will upgrade my postgres server the next chance I get, hopefully that does it. Thanks for all the help! -Eric From: Paul J Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: DBMail mailinglist To: DBMail mailinglist Subject: Re: [Dbmail] 2.2.2 slow Date: Sat, 07 Apr 2007 14:23:05 +0200 Alek

Re: [Dbmail] 2.2.2 slow

2007-04-06 Thread Eric Hiller
access that pgsql server if I upgraded to 8.2? (ie. php, asterisk, etc.) Or would it just work? Thanks, Eric From: tom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: DBMail mailinglist To: DBMail mailinglist Subject: Re: [Dbmail] 2.2.2 slow Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 09:09:55 -0400 At the risk of slowin

RE: [Dbmail] 2.2.2 slow

2007-04-05 Thread Eric Hiller
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Hiller Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2007 9:20 AM To: dbmail@dbmail.org Subject: RE: [Dbmail] 2.2.2 slow I am running centos as my OS for pgsql(dbmail is debian), and wanted to stay as packaged-based as I c

RE: [Dbmail] 2.2.2 slow

2007-04-05 Thread Eric Hiller
bmail-util -cy, in that there is a slight improvement but not much. Does anyone else have these issues with similar speed? or is it something specific to me, and I should be looking elsewhere for the issue? Thanks, Eric From: "Larry Rosenman" Reply-To: DBMail mailinglist To:

Re: [Dbmail] 2.2.2 slow

2007-04-04 Thread Eric Hiller
> 2.2 svn stable right now? I know there were a run of issues a week or > two back, but have the major issues cleared? If so, Eric could probably > try latest svn and report back on speed differences. > > Jesse > > > On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 20:33 +, Aaron Stone wrote: &

Re: [Dbmail] 2.2.2 slow

2007-04-04 Thread Eric Hiller
It is postgresql server, but not pg8, it is 7.4.8, so no autovacuum (as far as I know). If I upgraded to svn would I need to do anything besides just recompiling the source? (just make and install) - Eric From: "Aaron Stone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: DBMail mailingl

[Dbmail] 2.2.2 slow

2007-04-04 Thread Eric Hiller
? Thanks much for dbmail it really has been great, Eric _ Need a break? Find your escape route with Live Search Maps. http://maps.live.com/?icid=hmtag3 ___ DBmail mailing list DBmail@dbmail.org

Re: [Dbmail] Announce: dbmail 2.2.4 released

2007-03-13 Thread Eric Hiller
are you running pgsql? I noticed 2.2 was alot slower than 2.0, but since I needed sieve filters I lived with it. 2.2.4 really that much faster than 2.2.2? -Eric From: "Jorge Bastos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: DBMail mailinglist To: "DBMail mailinglist" Subj

[Dbmail] universal sieve scripts

2006-11-27 Thread Eric Hiller
Is there a way to have 1 sieve script run for every user, or do I need to individually add that sieve script to every user? Thanks, Eric _ All-in-one security and maintenance for your PC.  Get a free 90-day trial! http

Re: [Dbmail] Extremely slow performance with 2.2.1 + postgresql

2006-11-27 Thread Eric Hiller
ANALYZE every night? Thanks for all the help! From: Tom Allison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: DBMail mailinglist To: DBMail mailinglist Subject: Re: [Dbmail] Extremely slow performance with 2.2.1 + postgresql Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 21:07:17 -0500 Eric Hiller wrote: I read up a bit abou

Re: [Dbmail] Extremely slow performance with 2.2.1 + postgresql

2006-11-26 Thread Eric Hiller
I read up a bit about this command and it seems that while it is running the database is unusable. About how long did this take for you when you ran it? Thanks, Eric From: Tom Allison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: DBMail mailinglist To: DBMail mailinglist Subject: Re: [Dbmail] Ext

Re: [Dbmail] Extremely slow performance with 2.2.1 + postgresql

2006-11-26 Thread Eric Hiller
I ran dbmail-util -ay, is this what you mean? Or something else? I am running postgresql 7.4 and would be very interested in the steps taken to full-vacuum analyze. Also what steps did you take to "tune" the database? Thanks very much for the help, Eric From: Tom Allison <[EM

[Dbmail] Extremely slow performance with 2.2.1 + postgresql

2006-11-25 Thread Eric Hiller
for the entire time. Any ideas on this? 2.0.10 for me was very snappy. Thanks, Eric _ MSN Shopping has everything on your holiday list. Get expert picks by style, age, and price. Try it! http://shopping.msn.com/content/shp/?c

Re: [Dbmail] Minimal PostgreSQL version for DBMail

2005-09-28 Thread Eric Soroos
are only a couple of forward incompatible changes in postgres and many administration and performance improvements, there's very little reason not to be running one of the last couple stable versions 7.4 or 8.0. eric

Re: [Dbmail] OS/X build of 2.0.4?

2005-08-01 Thread Eric Soroos
Eric, as what user are you starting imapd? You *are* running as root, right? Root. I posted a trace on 7/13, here are the important bits: Jul 13 21:41:42 rum dbmail/imap4d[288]: CreateSocket(): socket created Jul 13 21:41:42 rum dbmail/imap4d[288]: CreateSocket(): socket IP requested

Re: [Dbmail] OS/X build of 2.0.4?

2005-08-01 Thread Eric Soroos
stopped cold by a shared memory error when runnung imapd. (Permission denied) If you manage to get past that, I'd love to know what you did. eric

Re: [Dbmail] 2.0.4 Compile OpenBSD3.7

2005-07-14 Thread Eric Soroos
;dm_getopt' dm_getopt.h:66: error: previous declaration of 'dm_getopt' I think this and a couple of other bsd issues are fixed in the subversion repository. eric

Re: [Dbmail] dbmail 2.04+ on osx tiger -- more debugging info

2005-07-14 Thread Eric Soroos
On Jul 12, 2005, at 11:28 PM, Eric Soroos wrote: Hi, I'm getting the following error with dbmail-pop3d and dbmail-imapd on startup: dbmail/pop3d[663]: pool.c,scoreboard_new: scoreboard init failed [Permission denied] Here's the full trace from debugging=5 Jul 13 21

[Dbmail] dbmail 2.04+ on osx tiger

2005-07-13 Thread Eric Soroos
he child processes. There's nothing special about this installation of tiger, other than I have bumped up shmax to ~ 160 megs to give postgres some breathing room. Any suggestions or ideas? thanks eric

Re: [Dbmail] 2.0 and transactions

2003-11-20 Thread Eric Soroos
ith fingerprint records etc. since the DB can live with it. I don't see how storing fingerprints could kill a database. eric

Re: [Dbmail] 2.0 and transactions

2003-11-20 Thread Eric Soroos
On Nov 20, 2003, at 8:28 AM, Magnus Sundberg wrote: Eric Soroos wrote: You can. That's effectively what I was doing in my message, except that you're not seeing it in the messageblk view. You probably don't want a unique constraint on messageblk, since the idea of the fing

Re: [Dbmail] 2.0 and transactions

2003-11-20 Thread Eric Soroos
toring or calculating it. Unique constraints are generally done with indexes (not sure about mysql, but it's certainly the case with postgres), so you'd end up adding the entire messageblk to the index. And it's not a particularly useful index, since that's the only thing that index would be good for. eric

Re: [Dbmail] 2.0 and transactions

2003-11-19 Thread Eric Soroos
d triggers. Performance seems reasonable. (although the testing managed to crash my laptop. ) eric

Re: [Dbmail] 2.0 and transactions

2003-11-19 Thread Eric Soroos
messageblks aren't referring to a specific message id, rather the messages are referring to a 'per unique message sequence' where unique message means delivered at the same time through the same invocation of dbmail-smtp. Message -> (m:n) message_blks eric

Re: [Dbmail] 2.0 and transactions

2003-11-19 Thread Eric Soroos
the possible # of dbmail-smtpd processes that could run at once and max amount in memory. Spooling to disk seems to be a loser to me in terms of complexity and performance. eric

Re: [Dbmail] 2.0 and transactions

2003-11-19 Thread Eric Soroos
cc/bcc'd messages where the body is the same. It would support multiple independent delivery. It would support fully identical delivery as well. eric create table messageblks_new ( fprint varchar(32), -- I'd rather use binary here blocksize int,

Re: [Dbmail] 2.0 and transactions

2003-11-18 Thread Eric Soroos
at least, on postgres. It's impossible on mysql). Pop should be nearly trivial to do with single statement update/deletes, there's some trickyness to imap that might prevent some of that. Sorry if this is a bit of a brain dump, but I've had these things rattling around in my head for a while. Expect another one on the db_getmailbox function soon, since that's one place where my performance is hurting right now. ;> eric

[Dbmail] 2.0 and transactions

2003-11-14 Thread Eric Soroos
addition of begin/commit around the calls db_insert_message and db_insert_block in pipe.c, I saw an improvement of about 30% in insert speed over the non-transactioned version. (run over ~1000 messages, 6 min vs ~9 min. ) eric Index: db.c

Re: [Dbmail] build problems

2003-11-14 Thread Eric Soroos
hat I needed to make, but I'm not sire if these changes are at the root or if I've changed something that is autogenerated, since I have less than virtually no experience with the autotools. eric [tibaby:~/src/dbmail-2.0/dbmail] erics% cvs diff ? config.h ? config.log ? config.status

[Dbmail] build problems

2003-11-13 Thread Eric Soroos
s is what I get from a configure/make clean /make run. I will note that the path to pg_config is strange, but it is valid. Any ideas? eric [tibaby:~/src/dbmail-2.0/dbmail] erics% ./configure --with-pgsql This is dbmail's GNU configure script. It's going to run a bunch of strang

Re: [Dbmail] DBMail: diff between 1.x and 2.x and other questions

2003-11-08 Thread Eric Soroos
n psql too. I'd say updates the last modified time, but that could be a contention bottleneck. - Only do the check once per minute on reads for an individual imap connection, unless that connection does a write or the client explicitly checks for it. eric

Re: [Dbmail] DBMail: diff between 1.x and 2.x and other questions

2003-11-06 Thread Eric Soroos
auth_getmaxmailsize(*useridnr); if (maxmail_size ==0 ) { return 0; } /* checking current size */ eric dbmail-trace Description: application/applefile dbmail-trace Description: Binary data

Re: [Dbmail] DBMail: diff between 1.x and 2.x and other questions

2003-11-06 Thread Eric Soroos
On Nov 5, 2003, at 8:10 PM, Matthew T. O'Connor wrote: Eric Soroos wrote: Maybe it's just my setup, but I've found that synching a 18k item mailbox gets me a message or two a seconds. Smaller mailboxes are damn fast. I'm on debian/stable, updated as of yesterday, runn

Re: [Dbmail] DBMail: diff between 1.x and 2.x and other questions

2003-11-05 Thread Eric Soroos
e join would do. e.g. select sum(messages.rfcSize) from messages inner join mailboxes using (mailbox_idnr) where mailbox.owner_idnr='me'. It would still be a table scan, but at least it would just be one table scan. (see db_check_sizelimit) eric

[Dbmail] dos attack

2003-10-15 Thread Eric Estabrooks
. I guess I'm not sure what should be done different as just spawning more children could dos the box the other way. What about letting a child deal with more than one connection at a time (like setting up a select or poll containing all of the connections it has) Eric smime.p7s

*****SPAM***** Re: [Dbmail] Hi

2003-10-03 Thread Eric Estabrooks
uch describe by Jason. If you make a lot of requests such as switching folders rapidly it'll get into this state. I'm running it on a 2.6.0-test4 kernel. Eric --- End Message ---

Re: [Dbmail] Hi

2003-10-03 Thread Eric Estabrooks
e via a transport to a simple shell script that parses the address and calls dbmail-smtp, or use procmail. that's what I was planning on doing but I was hoping that I just missed something and it already supported it :) Also how active is this project? This mailing list seems kind of

[Dbmail] Hi

2003-10-01 Thread Eric Estabrooks
-m $extension -u $recipient doesn't work and I can't use $user instead of $recpient because I doing mulitple domains so the addresses in dbmail are in the form [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks, Eric

Re: [Dbmail] Delete all mail to a specific direction...

2003-04-15 Thread Eric Soroos
this: > > dbmail-adduser f [EMAIL PROTECTED] '| cat > /dev/null' > > all the mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] will be forwarded to /dev/null. > > Is there a way to bounce such mail with an Error: No Such User? (similar to the way that sendmail does it in the virtusertable?) eric

Re: [Dbmail] popping mail with username as [EMAIL PROTECTED] problem

2003-04-01 Thread eric
ast one would just be sent as bar. This is just a general pita to explain to people, so I found it easier to go to a - instead of an @. eric

Re: [Dbmail] Imap and message dates

2003-04-01 Thread eric
On Tue, 01 Apr 2003 21:11:44 +0200 in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Paul Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thomas Sauer wrote: > > > eric wrote: > > > >> I've just set up a new dbmail server using the debian packages, and > >> I'm

[Dbmail] Imap and message dates

2003-04-01 Thread eric
ss the list before, but I can't find it now. Any ideas? eric

Re: [Dbmail] popping mail with username as [EMAIL PROTECTED] problem

2003-04-01 Thread eric
I've settled on user-domain.tld as my username pattern. I've only really tested it on mac clients but I've had no problems with it. eric

Re: Re[2]: [Dbmail] re: getting dbmail to work....thats not really the problem here

2003-01-31 Thread eric
aemons, 3 copies of postgres, email systems and apache. eric

Re: [Dbmail] Debian packages?

2003-01-25 Thread eric
> >other than that.. it looks good. > > > thanx. I'll announce an updated release promptly. > Thanks for doing this. eric

Re: [Dbmail] Postfix - why aliases?

2003-01-25 Thread eric
y to get your username from your email address (just s/@/-/) 2) Eudora works with it, where if you use [EMAIL PROTECTED], sometimes it drops the host if it's identical to the machine name. 3) no collisions. foo-example.com and foo-example.org are different people. eric

[Dbmail] Debian packages?

2003-01-21 Thread eric
Has anyone put together any .debs for dbmail 1.0? eric

[Dbmail] DBMail 1.0 keeps using 50-99% CPU time.

2002-12-23 Thread Eric Renfro
I keep having a consistant problem with dbmail-pop3d using up an almost constant 50-99% CPU time while it's running. I keep noticing it because my compiles go extremely slow during that. -- Eric Renfro Myrddin Computers & Designs - CEO/President

Re: [Dbmail] ANNOUNCEMENT: DBMAIL 1.0!!!

2002-12-18 Thread Eric Renfro
ain.c, it's looking for "dbmail.conf". instead of "/etc/dbmail.conf". I found this while using exim, and setting the current directory, as usual in my setups, to be /tmp. When I set it to /etc, it worked, so I fixed it that way in main.c. -- Eric Renfro Myrddin Computers & Designs - CEO/President Phone: (512) 527-9111 Fax:(512) 527-9034

Re: [Dbmail] POP-auth before SMTP adjustment.

2002-10-25 Thread Eric Renfro
On Thursday 24 October 2002 08:36 pm, Philip Warner wrote: > At 01:18 PM 24/10/2002 -0500, Eric Renfro wrote: > >Hrmm. Looking at the dbmail source in the pgsql.c, shows use of a table > > pbsp, seems to answer my problem, but there's no SQL table structure for > > it&#x

[Dbmail] PostgreSQL: POP-before-SMTP table structures:

2002-10-24 Thread Eric Renfro
CONSTRAINT "idnr_pkey" PRIMARY KEY ("idnr") ); CREATE UNIQUE INDEX "ipnumber_idx" ON "pbsp" ("ipnumber"); CREATE INDEX "since_idx" ON "pbsp" ("since"); - -- Eric Renfro Myrddin Computers & Designs

Re: [Dbmail] POP-auth before SMTP adjustment.

2002-10-24 Thread Eric Renfro
doesn't "fix" > anything, but it does narrow the potential abusers. Hrmm. Looking at the dbmail source in the pgsql.c, shows use of a table pbsp, seems to answer my problem, but there's no SQL table structure for it's use in dbmail/sql/postgres, however, there is for mysql. -- Eric Renfro Myrddin Computers & Designs - CEO/President Sales: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fax: (775) 243-4535

[Dbmail] POP-auth before SMTP adjustment.

2002-10-24 Thread Eric Renfro
- '5 minutes'::INTERVAL)::datetime; For an automagic trusted-hosts adjustment based on the host that authenticated to POP within 5 minutes. -- Eric Renfro Myrddin Computers & Designs - CEO/President Sales: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fax: (775) 243-4535

Re: [Dbmail] dbmail + squirrelmail

2002-10-24 Thread Eric Renfro
ers like INBOX.Trash, INBOX.Sent, INBOX.Drafts, but instead, the more simple, Trash, Sent-Mail, and Drafts. I don't know why SquirellMail developers use that prefix. Every IMAP server I know, always did that, and it's annoying. -- Eric Renfro Myrddin Computers & Designs - CEO/President Sales: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fax: (775) 243-4535

Re: [Dbmail] dbmail + squirrelmail

2002-10-24 Thread Eric Renfro
also work well with "Courier" and "uw", but other seems okay. -- Eric Renfro Myrddin Computers & Designs - CEO/President Sales: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fax: (775) 243-4535

[Dbmail] IMAP and QUOTA extension.

2002-10-19 Thread Eric Renfro
here is a link to a draft document of the proposed extension: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-cridland-imap-quota-00.txt -- Eric Renfro Myrddin Computers & Designs - CEO/President

Re: [Dbmail] List Manager

2002-10-18 Thread Eric Renfro
the fact it doesn't properly organize the list server-side like a mailing list should. -- Eric Renfro Myrddin Computers & Designs - CEO/President

Re: [Dbmail] database connection parameters in dbmail.conf ?

2002-10-18 Thread Eric Renfro
ting a bit nervous now that we have 15G in InnoDB tables). And also > means you can load balance busy sites with multiple slave servers. Now that's a lot of mail. hehe Eric Renfro

Re: [Dbmail] dbmail working with exim4.

2002-10-13 Thread Eric Renfro
ext, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > That was another one on my list. SSL. Is there a way to get SSL/TLS > > with > > dbmail at this time, or will that require stunnelling (if possible?) > > Stunnel works fine for this purpose. Both for pop and imap. Excelent! Good deal. Now I just need to figure out how to actually finally USE stunnel. This would be the first opportunity I'd actually have gotten to use it. ;) Eric

Re: [Dbmail] dbmail working with exim4.

2002-10-13 Thread Eric Renfro
On Saturday 12 October 2002 07:37 am, Ryan Butler wrote: > On Sat, 2002-10-12 at 05:19, Eric Renfro wrote: > > Well, after hammering, and hammering away with dbmail, after 1.0rc4's > > release, I plucked it right into my exim configuration, and so far, all > > The forw

[Dbmail] dbmail working with exim4.

2002-10-12 Thread Eric Renfro
ng "killall dbmail-imapd" to stop it, until I make a gentoo-style init script for it, but I can't see that dbmail-imapd is dropping a pid file down anywhere. Eric Renfro

Re: [Dbmail] Imapd is slow as hell

2002-09-24 Thread eric
ere. (because someone like me be implementing that table as a view, or adding columns for my use, or something like that. ) eric

Re: Re[4]: [Dbmail] novice help : part 2

2002-09-06 Thread eric
in, it's all legit traffic. A better approach would be to have spamassassin look for forged headers or message id's added by a relay. eric

[Dbmail] Several things- postfix's mailbox_transport, /etc/aliases, SpamAssasin

2002-07-27 Thread Eric Renfro
ing on this mailing list, up until now. Could anyone bring me up to speed on getting SpamAssassin running seemlessly with postfix-dbmail? All help is appreciated. - -- Eric Renfro - 07/27/02 - 8:05:37 AM CDT Myrddin Computers & Designs - CEO/President -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version

Re: [Dbmail] SpamAssassin, dbmail, and postfix

2002-07-27 Thread eric
to a user. 2, I'm a little leery about writing temp files. But that's just a predjudice of mine eric

Re: [Dbmail] Spam filtering -- Spam Assassin

2002-07-26 Thread eric
On Fri, 26 Jul 2002 14:31:54 -0400 in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Chris Hilts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > eric wrote: > > > I have spamd, the spamassassin daemon running on port 3000. Spamd > > will always be using the dbmail username & prefs, but I

Re: [Dbmail] Spam filtering -- Spam Assassin

2002-07-26 Thread eric
opriate paths, as I have dbmail installed in a slightly non-standard place. eric

[Dbmail] Patch for Debian/Postgres installation

2002-07-24 Thread eric
I've apparently gotten dbmail really working on debian woody now, so to make things a little easier on the next guy down the line, here's a nearly trivial patch for the paths that need to change. There's a bonus patch in there to make the makefile clean up everything for make distclean. On a cu

  1   2   >