Hello,
does anyone have a working sieve script to setup with dbmail to allow
learn/unlearn spam while moving/copying mail to/from junk folder?
I've found how to make it for dovecot on
https://workaround.org/ispmail/stretch/filtering-out-spam-with-rspamd but
dovecot uses 'sieve_global_
Am 05.03.2019 17:47, schrieb Paul J Stevens:
test
Paul, I can not ignore this email because I am so glad that you are
interested in dbmail again.
I sincerely hope that you get back in and care for and develop this
wonderful mail program again.
Cheers
Ralph
test
--
Paul J Stevens pjstevns @ gmail, twitter, github, linkedin
___
DBmail mailing list
DBmail@dbmail.org
http://lists.nfg.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
ticed the website was already moved.
I also intent to open up development so other stakeholders and active
users can more easily contribute.
For this I'm opening the 'dbmail' organisation on github. If you would
like me to add you please send me your github handle and I wil
bsite was already moved.
>
> I also intent to open up development so other stakeholders and active
> users can more easily contribute.
>
> For this I'm opening the 'dbmail' organisation on github. If you would
> like me to add you please send me your g
the website was already moved.
>
> I also intent to open up development so other stakeholders and active
> users can more easily contribute.
>
> For this I'm opening the 'dbmail' organisation on github. If you would
> like me to add you please send me your git
ibute.
For this I'm opening the 'dbmail' organisation on github. If you would
like me to add you please send me your github handle and I will add you.
https://github.com/dbmail
--
Paul J Stevens pjstevns @ gm
If you go this way I have something to contribute too.
Small stuff, mainly MySQL based.
---
Andrea Brancatelli
On 2019-02-21 11:01, Casper Langemeijer wrote:
> Hi All,
> The questions about the future of dbmail keeps popping up. As well as
> question on this mailinglist, I&#x
Hi All,
The questions about the future of dbmail keeps popping up. As well as
question on this mailinglist, I've tried to reach out to Paul a several
times last year. I'm not getting any response, even though I've put in alot
of hours in on making dbmail work with gmime3: htt
27;m using latest dbmail version 3.2.3
is there some setting ... tuining ... I can apply so dbmail works
together with horde and shows the details of the emails in the mailbox
listing?
thanks & greetings
Becki
_______
DBmail mailing list
DBmail@d
On 11/01/19 4:13, Maxim wrote:
This is the only server that works with DBMS to store all data. I
think this is a very good decision.
I have some performance improvements I would like to do but I have had
no time.
___
DBmail mailing list
DBmail
This is the only server that works with DBMS to store all data. I think
this is a very good decision.
___
DBmail mailing list
DBmail@dbmail.org
http://lists.nfg.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
Am 17.10.18 um 14:04 schrieb Christian Reischl:
> Dear Harald,
>
> thank you for the quick answer.
>
> Here are more details:
>
> OS: Debian 7 LTS (upgrade to 9 soon)
> DBmail: 3.1.13-1 (from deprecated nfgd.net repo)
> GMime: 2.6.10-1
> MariaDB: 10.1.26-0+deb
Dear Harald,
thank you for the quick answer.
Here are more details:
OS: Debian 7 LTS (upgrade to 9 soon)
DBmail: 3.1.13-1 (from deprecated nfgd.net repo)
GMime: 2.6.10-1
MariaDB: 10.1.26-0+deb9 (on separate Debian 9.5 host)
Roundcube: 1.3.7
The best solution seems to be an upgrade of DBMail
Am 17.10.18 um 12:19 schrieb Christian Reischl:
> Hello,
>
> we just moved a DBMail installation from MySQL to MariaDB.
>
> Everything works well using Thunderbird, but web clients like Roundcube
> and SOGo Groupware cannot display the message list. The folder list is
>
Hello,
we just moved a DBMail installation from MySQL to MariaDB.
Everything works well using Thunderbird, but web clients like Roundcube
and SOGo Groupware cannot display the message list. The folder list is
shown, including the number of messages, but the message list remains empty.
The
Hello,
I had dbmail working from years.
I encounter several imapd dies per day since a week.
The error message is "dbmail-imapd: dm_string.c:160: p_string_erase:
Assertion `pos + len <= S->used' failed.".
The only recent change I can correlate may be the increase
Am 07.10.18 um 12:04 schrieb Maxim:
> I use Posgres, now I switched to version 10, it works much faster.
> dbmail-utils almost never use, sql scripts directly run faster and more
> reliably.
i doubt that you are faster and more relieable with sql-scripts instead
"dbmail-util -y
I use Posgres, now I switched to version 10, it works much faster.
dbmail-utils almost never use, sql scripts directly run faster and more
reliably.
sorry, but also thought about switching to dovecot.
05.10.18 22:30, Reindl Harald (mobile) пишет:
MariaDB 10.2.18 but that issue exists
I used to use dbmail for my service. I thought it would be a no-brainer to
set up with some sort of control panel app since, hey, it's SQL. However,
I had t stop using it because it doesn't look like it's maintained any
longer. There hasn't been an update since early la
MariaDB 10.2.18 but that issue exists virtually forever and predates MariaDB
I don't get what is that hard to handle database input properly and no you
can't reject non rfc conform messages on postfix side as long the server is not
for personal use
when dbmail-util is not able to cle
which DBMS do you use?
05.10.18 14:52, Reindl Harald пишет:
that there is a invalid char in a header is one thing, but that dbmail
produces non-recovery errors in that case sucks
<147609553.1537264268556.JavaMail.ýkids2@oekids-server>
"<75106708.5820290.1537266387...@mail.yaho
that there is a invalid char in a header is one thing, but that dbmail
produces non-recovery errors in that case sucks
<147609553.1537264268556.JavaMail.ýkids2@oekids-server>
"<75106708.5820290.1537266387...@mail.yahoo.com>")]
Oct 05 13:36:09 mail.thelounge. dbmail-util[20
this sucks for years
* why does this happen at all
* why no output of database-id instead a dot
* why no dbmail-util switch "kill messages you can't handle"
* why spit lines with breaks into maillog confusing mailgraph
--
Ok. Found [3] missing
atest most current version of DBmail located?
git.dbmail.eu doesn't seem to be working for me. The version that I'm running
right now is the PJSTEVNS version at Github but that seems to be fairly old at
this point
sadly dbmail seems to be completly orphaned and it's really frust
While it's true that dbmail didn't receive any commit for new code
later, emails are a pretty old and not moving target.
In general there a couple of open points and a couple of bugs here and
there that would need fixing, but frankly I don't feel worried about
using it.
Persona
have had a positive experience with the
multi-master syncing. It sounds like a solid solution, and in my case a
simple one because for now I won't even need IMAP from either server.
The other thing that worries me is that dbmail is going to fall into a
state of disrepair without any devel
Hello,
Has anyone managed to setup successfully user authentication via Samba 4
AD LDAP?
I have followed some threads I found with google, but unfortunately
without success.
If I leave bind_dn and bind_pw empty, dbmail-imapd starts, but the no
user can get authenticated. Also dbmail-users
my best
> option, where I have a primary server that is up most of the time and I
> can use pacemaker to switch from one to the other for failovers.
>
> I think I could get away with not using a distributed file system if I
> were to switch from dovecot to dbmail. I definitely
Hello Ryan,
The way I achieve this through dbmail is by using a replica mysql
cluster as a back-end database
In practical terms you set up the 2 sites each with a mysql DB and
configure them for mutual replication. On top you have 1 dbmail instance
deployed at each site that points to its
https://github.com/pjstevns/dbmail
---
Andrea Brancatelli
On 2018-09-20 18:31, Peter Smith wrote:
> Also, where is the latest most current version of DBmail located?
> git.dbmail.eu doesn't seem to be working for me. The version that I'm
> running right now is the
away with not using a distributed file system if I
were to switch from dovecot to dbmail. I definitely need the
distributed database, so avoid also using a distributed file system
seems like a way to keep my architecture as simple as possible (but
please correct me if I am wrong).
For doing geo-r
un - surely this is something your employer could
> fund?
>
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 5:11 AM Reindl Harald <mailto:h.rei...@thelounge.net>> wrote:
>
>
>
> Am 20.09.18 um 18:31 schrieb Peter Smith:
> > Also, where is the latest most current version of DBmail
gt; Am 20.09.18 um 18:31 schrieb Peter Smith:
> > Also, where is the latest most current version of DBmail located?
> git.dbmail.eu doesn't seem to be working for me. The version that I'm
> running right now is the PJSTEVNS version at Github but that seems to be
> fairly old a
Am 20.09.18 um 18:31 schrieb Peter Smith:
> Also, where is the latest most current version of DBmail located?
> git.dbmail.eu doesn't seem to be working for me. The version that I'm
> running right now is the PJSTEVNS version at Github but that seems to be
> fairly ol
Also, where is the latest most current version of DBmail located?
git.dbmail.eu doesn't seem to be working for me. The version that I'm running
right now is the PJSTEVNS version at Github but that seems to be fairly old at
this point.
Thanks,
Peter
__
Hey there; I've come across a situation wherein I have imapfilter attempting to
store a message on my dbmail system that apparently contains a NUL character in
the middle of a MIME block.. According to my logs it looks like this throws
dbmail for a loop, making the IMAP conversation s
that)
the table has an index on the name, so the DB query should be
relatively fast - so it seems the delay is somewhere in dbmail-imapd?
Regards
___
DBmail mailing list
DBmail@dbmail.org
http://lists.nfg.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
signature.asc
commands sent to the server).
Regards
On 2018-07-06 20:11, Pascal Longrais wrote:
Hello,
I am using dbmail 3.2.3 since long time and never saw this trouble:
In Thunderbird I select all mails in the Junk folder and apply Delete.
All mails then disappear and the folder is empty.
Going into the
Hello,
I am using dbmail 3.2.3 since long time and never saw this trouble:
In Thunderbird I select all mails in the Junk folder and apply Delete.
All mails then disappear and the folder is empty.
Going into the Trash folder, I do see all deleted mails.
But few time after, the Junk folder is
more complicated for someone who really wants to do it).
Alternatively what would probably be easier would be to write a
patch to load the database config from a different location, and
make that file not readable by your admins (through whichever
means) but only readable by root / the dbmail
ns) but only readable by root / the dbmail process
can't work - dbmail-util needs to read it too and so the user invoking
dbmail-util is able to do the same
either i am admin for a service or not.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQGzBAEBCAAdFiEEnStGzbwUCjZ1OuTXMxdNWliSt7gFAls80aUACgkQMx
with
sudoers it will be tricky to allow edit/watch files but not a sepcific
one with the credentials
> On 02/07/18 06:15, Thomas Raschbacher wrote:
>> Hi.
>>
>> If you used a symetric encryption you'd still have the decryption
>> available within the dbmail binaries,
probably be easier would be to write a patch to
load the database config from a different location, and make that file
not readable by your admins (through whichever means) but only readable
by root / the dbmail process
That said .. do your mail admins have full root access on these systems?
Do
resolved the
problem. One could introduce a variable encryption seed at installation
time which is only valid for that deployment.
On 02/07/18 06:15, Thomas Raschbacher wrote:
Hi.
If you used a symetric encryption you'd still have the decryption
available within the dbmail binaries, and -
Hi.
If you used a symetric encryption you'd still have the decryption
available within the dbmail binaries, and - since it is open source -
you'd be able to look at the algorithm and still somehow decrypt the
key.
Asymetric might be slightly better, but still the same applies in t
Hello Reindl,
Please see my follow-up below. I find dbmail has great potential.
On 27/06/18 22:22, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 27.06.2018 um 20:46 schrieb Mauro Mozzarelli:
That is correct. I was looking to secure DB access by encrypting the
credentials in the configuration file.
how do you
Am 27.06.2018 um 20:46 schrieb Mauro Mozzarelli:
> That is correct. I was looking to secure DB access by encrypting the
> credentials in the configuration file.
how do you imagine that to start with?
dbmail needs to authenticate against the database and so it needs the
credentials - f
, Thomas Raschbacher wrote:
Hi.
I think Mauro meant if it is possible to have the Database credentials
themselves encrypted in dbmail.conf. - To answer that: I don't think
that is possible, but if you configure permissions properly (0600 or
maybe 0660 then noone but the dbmail user and
Hi.
I think Mauro meant if it is possible to have the Database credentials
themselves encrypted in dbmail.conf. - To answer that: I don't think
that is possible, but if you configure permissions properly (0600 or
maybe 0660 then noone but the dbmail user and root should have access to
it)
Password encryption is mostly transparent on the application side, you
just have to choose an encryption method when you create an user with
dbmail-users - the password will be encrypted on the db and DBMail will
handle it transparently.
---
Andrea Brancatelli
On 2018-06-23 14:05, Mauro
Hi All,
I am new to this list, thus apologies if the question was asked before.
How do I configure securely the database authentication credentials in
dbmail.conf?
Is there a way to encrypt the password?
Thank you in advance,
Mauro
___
DBmail
hello everyone,
I've tried recently to configure timsieved for dbmail-3.2.3, sieve works
without tls encryption, as far as I enable tls_port (for example 4190),
timsieved does not response at all. I can see timsieved reports it had
already bind to SSL_PORT 4190, if I test it with sieve-co
, Casper Langemeijer wrote:
> I've started working on porting dbmail to gmime3. My work is public, but not
> finished.
>
> https://github.com/langemeijer/dbmail/tree/upgrade-to-gmime3 [1]
> I am not a C developer by profession, and I lack experience. Most of the work
>
I've started working on porting dbmail to gmime3. My work is public, but not
finished.
https://github.com/langemeijer/dbmail/tree/upgrade-to-gmime3
(https://link.getmailspring.com/link/1524473037.local-204e8f4e-7406-v1.2.1-7e744...@getmailspring.com/0?redirect=https%3A%2F%2Fgithu
well, and here we are back at the bad or non existing maintainance state
of dbmail: configure: error: Unable to locate gmime development files
[builduser@testserver:~]$ rpm -qa | grep gmime
gmime-devel-3.0.5-1.fc27.20180421.rh.x86_64
gmime-3.0.5-1.fc27.20180421.rh.x86_64
Am 21.04.2018 um 12:35
the header mangeling is gmime
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=776825
ftp://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/gmime/3.0/
DKIM verifyication/scoring normally happens before dbmail-lmtpd and
forwardings should also not touch the spilt/reconstruct code
as far as i can see the GPG breakage
I fired up my facebook account, and added a few email addresses to send
mails to my accounts. I found that mails sent to my gmail account directly
differ from the mails I receive with my dbmail server in one important way:
The 'Content-Type; header has a different format.
Sent (and received
I'm not sure this is related, and I probably should investigate further
before posting this here, but in my setup, dbmail seems to break DKIM
signatures.
I've seen that mails from booking.com and facebook.com have broken DKIM
signatures according to google's gmail, when forwarded b
Hmm duno about that one, but i don't use SpamAssassin at the moment..
That aside - and without checking now - are there any test-emails with
expected results, that would test that part of dbmail automatically?
On 2018-04-18 17:48, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 18.04.2018 um 07:32 schrieb T
Am 18.04.2018 um 07:32 schrieb Thomas Raschbacher:
> hmm ..
>
> I have no such problems with dbmail 3.2.3 (and gmime 2.6.20
looking at all the urgent fixes after 3.0 as well as 3.1 where a ton
of people pretended all is fine made me shy in case of dbmail updates
especially when de
hmm ..
I have no such problems with dbmail 3.2.3 (and gmime 2.6.20
On 2018-04-16 14:34, Reindl Harald wrote:
moving from imap-sent folder to a local-folder don't break it
see diff from the this way "saved" orginal sent and the broken one
this is the source-tarball and
moving from imap-sent folder to a local-folder don't break it
see diff from the this way "saved" orginal sent and the broken one
this is the source-tarball and one of the last important patches how
dbmail is built here
https://access.thelounge.net/harry/dbmail-sources.zip
dbmai
sorry for the mail-flood - but i will try to move it now to a local
folder - i think the breakage to the sent message happens instantly
but thunderbird before moveing it shows some caching where it is fine
and not put through dbmail re-construct
good question if this also happens when move it
this message was broken too while the sent message was green until i
moved it with drag&drop from sent to the dbmail folder with the
intention to make a diff
now for both copies enigmail says "wrong signature"
Am 16.04.2018 um 14:09 schrieb Reindl Harald:
> Am 16.04.2018 um 13:
e back with broken signature in
case i used GPG/Mime meaning "signature.asc" attached instead inline
signing
for me at that time it wasn't clear that it's my own mailserver
running dbmail-1.3 and not the list servers which are breaking
something but the diff you can see is the outb
do you have that problem vor every signed email, or just occasionally?
cuz i haven't noticed problems on my part yet
On 2018-04-01 13:14, Reindl Harald wrote:
ping - see also attached as diff
if someone is able to fix that for dbmail-3.1 i offer to pay the
ping - see also attached as diff
if someone is able to fix that for dbmail-3.1 i offer to pay the work
2874f497fb429ed139e94342ca1c84325b20b3f1 is the git with latest fixes
for 3.1 before move to github - not sure if they ever made it to a
offical release and we applied the patch from paul (also
>>>>> "TR" == Thomas Raschbacher writes:
TR> has anyone experience with users with lots of folders, where
TR> retrieving the folder list takes 5-10 seconds (tested with just
TR> a python interactive prompt, so it really only does that)
Unfortunately dbmail w
somewhere in dbmail-imapd?
Regards
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
DBmail mailing list
DBmail@dbmail.org
http://lists.nfg.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
8
> disable = no
> socket_type = stream
> protocol= tcp
> wait= no
> user = root
> server = /usr/bin/timelimit
> server_args = -t120 -T120 /usr/local/sbin/dbmail-lmtpd -n
>
> }
>
> but shortly after it starting up I get
could
> probably have a look at postgresq, but i am definitely not going to set up
> oracle ;))
>
> Regards
>
> On 2018-02-27 18:49, Andrea Brancatelli wrote:
>
> Hello everybody,
>
> we recently kicked of an internal project to implement a Full Text Search
> capabi
Hi.
I had to do some optimizing of a user's mailboxes, so i wrote some
useful SQL:
https://blog.lordvan.com/blog/dbmail-quickly-get-mailbox-counts-including-deleted-emails-postgresql/
I assume that MySQL or oracle syntax would be a bit different (do they
have FILTER ? no idea.. )
But
roject to implement a Full Text Search
> capability into DBMAIL.
>
> It's basically centred about a few different things:
>
> * A dedicated dbmail_mimeparts_fts table with (native MySQL) full text
> indexes where only a "clean" (read cleartext) version of
port = 9998
disable = no
socket_type = stream
protocol= tcp
wait= no
user= root
server = /usr/bin/timelimit
server_args = -t120 -T120 /usr/local/sbin/dbmail-lmtpd -n
}
but shortly after it s
Hello everybody,
we recently kicked of an internal project to implement a Full Text
Search capability into DBMAIL.
It's basically centred about a few different things:
* A dedicated dbmail_mimeparts_fts table with (native MySQL) full text
indexes where only a "clean"
oot /usr/local/bin/timelimit timelimit -t120
-T120 /usr/local/sbin/dbmail-lmtpd -n
And it works like a charm. It clearly doesn't fix the problem but at
least it gives you a working situation.
I can confirm that having multiple lmtpd dispatched by inetd is much
faster than the daemon. Furtherm
Howdy folks,
I'm running dbmail 3.2.3 on a postgresql db and am having slow inserts.
About 2 seconds each. This is not really ok and it tends to get behind
during peak usage or when someone emails every mailbox. I read that 2
seconds a message is not abnormal, can anyone confirm this
cket traces for the LDAP
query and response and did not see "sAMAccountName" in the response, curiously
enough, but did see "uid". I've verified that it is working for me now.
Thanks,
Peter
-Original Message-
From: Peter Smith
Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2018 10:16 AM
Thank you for the response.
I am using PostGreSQL, the auth is LDAP, and I'm running at maximum logging
level.
The error is isolated, however here's some entries around the error:
Feb 01 10:08:23 linux dbmail-imapd[19484]: [0xeb55e0] Debug:[db]
db_imap_split_mailbox(+2387): Prepari
lders on my DBMAIL back-end. As of right now, however, I am not
> able to make new mailboxes.
>
> Should I create a Bugreport?
>
> Ultimately I'm getting the following in dbmail.err .
>
> Jan 30 16:06:27 linux dbmail-imapd[8144]: [0x21c0450] Error:[db]
> db_create
It has been quite a while but I'm fairly certain that I used to be able to
create folders on my DBMAIL back-end. As of right now, however, I am not able
to make new mailboxes.
Should I create a Bugreport?
Ultimately I'm getting the following in dbmail.err .
Jan 30 16:06:27 linux db
out its because of the dbmail_messages table is really slow.
> It took 5 minutes to delete 300 rows. My dbmail_messages table has 7628586
> rows. Is that alot? Our old server with dbmail 2.2 and postgres 8 seemed to
> run alot better. I used the 2.2 and postgresql performance guide but I
rows. Is that alot? Our old server with dbmail 2.2 and postgres 8 seemed to
> run alot better. I used the 2.2 and postgresql performance guide but I am
> not sure how much of that is relevent to 3.2.3 and postgresql 9.5. Is there
> a newer guide or can you give me some suggestions to speed
? Our old server with dbmail 2.2 and postgres 8 seemed to
run alot better. I used the 2.2 and postgresql performance guide but I am
not sure how much of that is relevent to 3.2.3 and postgresql 9.5. Is there
a newer guide or can you give me some suggestions to speed it up?
I run dbmail-util -ay every
Do this:
SELECT user_idnr FROM dbmail_users WHERE userid = "YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS"
Write down the corresponding ID
SELECT mailbox_idnr, name FROM dbmail_mailboxes WHERE owner_idnr =
Find the ID of your mailbox.
DELETE FROM dbmail_messages WHERE mailbox_idnr =
Done.
dbmai
If I do a:
dbmail-export -D -d -u
It seems to empty the mailbox.
On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 9:47 AM, rich carroll wrote:
> Howdy Folks,
>
> I have a mailbox that I used for testing. It has about 300,000 messages in
> it. I can not open it in webmail. I am trying to empty it out.
&g
Howdy Folks,
I have a mailbox that I used for testing. It has about 300,000 messages in
it. I can not open it in webmail. I am trying to empty it out.
I have ran:
dbmail-users -e -y
It looks like its doing something for a bit but nothing gets removed from
the box.
I am currently trying to
On 09/01/2018 06:21, Thomas Raschbacher wrote:
On 2018-01-08 18:01, Alan Hicks wrote:
Plans, or at least ideas, yes. dbmail would benefit from ability to
handle multiple requests per session.
There is an outstanding task to fix the MySQL 5.7 (showstopper) bug.
Nice to hear.
I was going to
On 2018-01-08 18:01, Alan Hicks wrote:
>> I was going to check git.dbmail.eu, but it seems it is not working anymore?
>> the only thing i found was paul's dbmail repo on github, which i assume to
>> be the current up2date one.
> There is a fork at https://github.com/al
On 2018-01-08 18:01, Alan Hicks wrote:
Plans, or at least ideas, yes. dbmail would benefit from ability to
handle multiple requests per session.
There is an outstanding task to fix the MySQL 5.7 (showstopper) bug.
Nice to hear.
I was going to check git.dbmail.eu, but it seems it is not
Hi,
On 08/01/2018 15:52, Thomas Raschbacher wrote:
Hi all & especially Paul ;)
Hope you all are having a good start into the new year.
I just thought it would be nice to know if there are any plans for
DBMail's future (or lack thereof?)
Plans, or at least ideas, yes. dbmail woul
found was paul's dbmail repo on github, which i assume
to be the current up2date one.
Is DBmail going to be maintained/"supported"/developed further at all,
or do we need to consider it to be in need of a new Maintainer /
dev(group) ?
-- not trying to offend anyone here, so if
721 folders (which i am
> trying to get down to a reasonable amount since all webmail clients go either
> really slow, or time out)
>
> Regards
> _______
> DBmail mailing list
> DBmail@dbmail.org
> http://lists.nfg.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
it through imap which is slower,
but doable since it is only one user and a total of 3721 folders (which
i am trying to get down to a reasonable amount since all webmail clients
go either really slow, or time out)
Regards
_______
DBmail mailing l
On 18/10/17 05:02, Ralph Ballier wrote:
>
> Hello Sandino,
>
> thanks für your hints, to use sys dbmail 3.2 rather than dbmail 3.1.
> But do you had read about problems with dbmail 3.2 and mysql 5.7?
> Every INSERT does not work. I myself have tried it.
>
I have not tried dbma
- Nachricht von Sandino Araico Sánchez -
Datum: Mon, 16 Oct 2017 15:50:36 -0500
Von: Sandino Araico Sánchez
Betreff: Re: [Dbmail] dbmail-messageblks missing in dbmail 3.1.17
An: DBMail mailinglist , Ralph Ballier
On 16/10/17 08:56, Ralph Ballier wrote
On 16/10/17 08:56, Ralph Ballier wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I had tried to install dbmail 3.1.17 but there are problems. I looked
> at the database and have found: there is not table named
> "dbmail-messageblks".
>
> The reason is, that in "dbmail-3.1.17/sql/m
Am 16.10.2017 um 15:56 schrieb Ralph Ballier:
Hello,
I had tried to install dbmail 3.1.17 but there are problems. I looked at
the database and have found: there is not table named "dbmail-messageblks".
The reason is, that in "dbmail-3.1.17/sql/mysql/create_tables.mysq
Hello,
I had tried to install dbmail 3.1.17 but there are problems. I looked
at the database and have found: there is not table named
"dbmail-messageblks".
The reason is, that in "dbmail-3.1.17/sql/mysql/create_tables.mysql"
the command "CREATE dbmail-messagesb
1 - 100 of 19911 matches
Mail list logo
