I upgraded to Fedora 6, downloaded installed the most recent _2_2_branch.
I can't recieve emails and this is the dbmail.err file,
*** glibc detected *** dbmail-lmtpd: munmap_chunk(): invalid pointer:
0x007c56ec ***
=== Backtrace: =
/lib/libc.so.6(cfree+0x1bb)[0x17967b]
/lib/libglib
Can anyone tell me where the logs are for dbmail , my imapd isnt starting and i
cant figure out why, maybe the logs will tell me
Thanks in advance
ALex___
DBmail mailing list
DBmail@dbmail.org
https://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
Alex McAuley wrote:
Can anyone tell me where the logs are for dbmail , my imapd isnt
starting and i cant figure out why, maybe the logs will tell me
/var/log/maillog
___
DBmail mailing list
DBmail@dbmail.org
https://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/
Hi, I recently upgraded my dbmail to 2.2.11 and decided to create a new
email account/mailbox to make sure everything is working correctly. I sent
myself an email and retrieved it via outlook using dbmail-imapd. Below is
the error I received in dbmail.err
The email displays correctly, but wonder
What database server and version are you using? This seems like an older
database not able to handle that query.
-Jon
David Young wrote:
> Hi, I recently upgraded my dbmail to 2.2.11 and decided to create a
> new email account/mailbox to make sure everything is working
> correctly. I sent mys
Running CentOS 5.2, Postgres 8.3.7.
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 8:24 PM, Jonathan Feally wrote:
> What database server and version are you using? This seems like an older
> database not able to handle that query.
>
> -Jon
>
> David Young wrote:
> > Hi, I recently upgraded my dbmail to 2.2.11 and deci
On Donnerstag 10 September 2009 David Young wrote:
> Sep 10 00:39:49 node1.the.matrix dbmail-imapd[4957]: Error:[sql]
> dbpgsql.c,db_query(+287): query failed [SELECT m.message_idnr,
> v.header value, k.messageblk FROM dbmail_messageblks k JOIN
> dbmail_physmessage p ON k.physmessage_id=p.id JOIN d
On Donnerstag 10 September 2009 Michael Monnerie wrote:
> PostgreSQL 8.3 issue
Interesting, I got this answer from a PG dev:
There has *never* been a Postgres release that accepted bytea ILIKE
something. I'm not sure what you were really doing before, but that
wasn't it.
First I created a new user on dbmail with dbmail-user with the following
options (-a -s -w -p MD5-HASH). DBMAIL created the new user/mailbox
successfully.
Next, I created an IMAP mailbox using Outlook 2003 SP3. Connected to
dbmail-imapd. Outlook showed a single mailbox (Inbox). I sent an email
I reproduced the problem again by doing the same thing. Here's the
FULL error log. Sorry for the SPAM.
Sep 10 19:07:27 dbmail/imap4d[16437]: Error:[sql]
dbpgsql.c,db_query(+287): query failed [SELECT m.message_idnr,
v.headervalue, k.messageblk FROM dbmail_messageblks k JOIN
dbmail_physmessage p
> "Michael" == Michael Monnerie
> writes:
Michael> How did you make dbmail run such a query? Looks like via a
Michael> search, but I guess that never worked and would be a bug
Michael> then. So please, how can I reproduce that query?
That block is in mailbox_search() (and the query is e
On Donnerstag 10 September 2009 Michael Monnerie wrote:
> So, this is the query you posted stripped down:
> SELECT k.messageblk FROM dbmail_messageblks k WHERE
> k.messageblk ILIKE '%multipart/encrypted%';
>
> He's right, that query doesn't work on PG 8.1 either.
OK, this is a bug in dbmail, whic
> "Michael" == Michael Monnerie
> writes:
Michael> I would have thought convert_from, possibly combined with
Michael> convert, would do it. And this should really do the magic,
Michael> but I'm on 8.1 today, will test on 8.3 soon.
Indeed, convert_from() can be used to coerce the messag
James Cloos wrote:
> This query in psql does give me the header of a message sent to this
> group:
>
> ,
> | select physmessage_id from dbmail_messageblks where is_header = 1
> |and convert_from(messageblk,'SQL_ASCII') ~ 'dbmail-dev' limit 1;
> `
>
> It is, however, as one might expec
On Donnerstag 17 September 2009 Paul J Stevens wrote:
> No way around that without full text indexing.
Any chance to have FTI support? PostgreSQL 8.3 has that built-in AFAIK,
so it could be interesting. Dbmail could support it if the DB supports
it, I just don't know how much effort that would b
Michael Monnerie wrote:
> On Donnerstag 17 September 2009 Paul J Stevens wrote:
>
>> No way around that without full text indexing.
>>
>
> Any chance to have FTI support? PostgreSQL 8.3 has that built-in AFAIK,
> so it could be interesting. Dbmail could support it if the DB supports
> it,
On Donnerstag 17 September 2009 Jonathan Feally wrote:
> FTI would help searching greatly, however on MySQL the default is to
> only index words 4 chars or longer. Thus it makes it unreliable when
> searching for a small word of 3 chars or less. You can change it to
> index 3 chars, which would pro
On Thu, 17 Sep 2009 23:52:24 +0200, Michael Monnerie
wrote:
> On Donnerstag 17 September 2009 Jonathan Feally wrote:
>> FTI would help searching greatly, however on MySQL the default is to
>> only index words 4 chars or longer. Thus it makes it unreliable when
>> searching for a small word of 3 ch
Jonathan Feally wrote:
> Michael Monnerie wrote:
>> On Donnerstag 17 September 2009 Paul J Stevens wrote:
>>
>>> No way around that without full text indexing.
>>>
>> Any chance to have FTI support? PostgreSQL 8.3 has that built-in AFAIK,
>> so it could be interesting. Dbmail could support
Aaron Stone wrote:
> I don't think any database's own full text index will really do what we
> want for IMAP. I'd love to bolt on Sphinx or something like it and have it
> manage the search index out of band. http://www.sphinxsearch.com/
Dude, you read my mind again? (or did I read yours...)
I wa
Hi,
I noticed next message in maillog:
Jul 17 06:40:32 test dbmail/imap4d[3849]: Error:[imapsession]
dbmail-imapsession.c,dbmail_imap_session_readln(+1512): timeout occurred in
dbmail_imap_session_readln
Jul 17 06:40:32 test dbmail/imap4d[3847]: Error:[imapsession]
dbmail-imapsession.c,dbmail_
Hi!
Can anybody explain me that means this error?
17.07.07, 13:57, umask <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
> I noticed next message in maillog:
> Jul 17 06:40:32 test dbmail/imap4d[3849]: Error:[imapsession]
> dbmail-imapsession.c,dbmail_imap_session_readln(+1512): timeout occurred in
> dbmail_imap
umask wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Can anybody explain me that means this error?
It means a client tells dbmail to expect a certain amount of data, but
the client stops before sending all data.
for instance when a client appends a message using imap/store:
C: A001 STORE "mailbox" {10}
S: * OK gimme that da
23 matches
Mail list logo
