Paul J Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Aaron Stone wrote:
> > I think it's a really interesting idea, and makes a lot of sense once
> > we have the headers parsed out as there'd be no reason to search the
> > messageblks, and indeed no reason to look at them at all unless it's
> > the message
Aaron Stone wrote:
The problem right now is that we're trying to get the 2.0 release out, and so
there's basically three threads happening right now:
- Getting 2.0 released without further adieu
- Thawing for a specific set of usability fixes
- Random other stuff
Unfortunately, your compresse
Have you tested your own proposal on a real database?
If you rename aliases to aliases_1 postgres still wont allow you to
create aliases. That was the reason for this hack. But perhaps I
misunderstand some underlying postgres mechanism, but this is how I
solved it.
Hans Kristian Rosbach wrot
Eric Wong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> - REFERENCES `mailboxes` (`mailbox_idnr`) ON DELETE CASCADE,
> + REFERENCES `mailboxes` (`mailbox_idnr`) ON DELETE CASCADE
Thanks very much for testing this out and submitting a fix!
With any patch, and especially one this subtle, pl
