Tom Ivar Helbekkmo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
[snip]... while PostgreSQL totally whipped MySQL once the
> going got tough -- it's built to handle complex queries, and it's also
> built to withstand the pressure of many simultaneous users. MySQL is
> not, and takes a really bad performance hit when
Aaron Stone wrote:
So... all criticisms of MySQL are exactly on target. But so what? On the
down side, we need to eschew some features and best practices in order to
support MySQL. On the up side, support is actively being added to MySQL
and we can just roll right along with it, incorportating f
"Kevin Baker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Do you have a reference for this slashdot article? I'd be interested
> to read it. As you say mysql has made many improvements recently,
> but I am still intersted in reviewing PgSQL in a production env,
> especially for DBMail.
My memory seems to have
Hey Mathew:
Hope you are having a great weekend.
You make a good point on benchmarking. I suspect defining the criteria model
is at issue.
I rely on some experience building search engines to say for
high-connection-rate 'small results' there is no level where anything but a
flat file is faster tha
A BUGNOTE has been added to this bug.
==
http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=100
==
Reported By:tsoutherwood
Assign
